Literature DB >> 31368741

Benefits of daily support visibility versus invisibility across the adult life span.

Brett K Jakubiak1, Brooke C Feeney2, Rebecca A Ferrer3.   

Abstract

Amid growing disagreement about the benefits of visible and invisible support, we tested daily associations among support visibility and changes in individual and relational well-being in young adult newlyweds (Study 1) and older married couples (Study 2). To extend past research, we assessed emotional and practical support visibility in 3 contexts (context-general, stress-related, and goal-related) each day. In both samples, reporting context-general or goal-related support receipt predicted increases in personal and relational well-being day-to-day. Further, direct comparison between visible and invisible support days revealed relative personal and relational benefits associated with visible support days. In contrast, reporting stress-related support receipt was related to decreases in personal well-being in both samples, despite increases in relational well-being. This relative personal benefit associated with invisible stress-related support is consistent with past work showing benefits of invisible support for people experiencing major stressors. The current research highlights the need for a nuanced approach to understanding support visibility. Although invisible support may be preferable to protect self-efficacy and prevent distress in some situations (high stress or stressor-related support contexts), its benefits may be less wide-ranging than originally thought. In nonstress contexts and for relational outcomes, visible support may instead prove advantageous. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368741      PMCID: PMC6994384          DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  52 in total

1.  A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships.

Authors:  N L Collins; B C Feeney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  He said, she said: a quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners.

Authors:  Shelly L Gable; Harry T Reis; Geraldine Downey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

3.  Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning.

Authors:  Brooke C Feeney; Nancy L Collins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-08

4.  A secure base: responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships.

Authors:  Brooke C Feeney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-11

5.  Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; John G Holmes; Nancy L Collins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Renn Upchurch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Understanding the Links Between Social Support and Physical Health: A Life-Span Perspective With Emphasis on the Separability of Perceived and Received Support.

Authors:  Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

Review 8.  Romantic relationships and mental health.

Authors:  Scott Braithwaite; Julianne Holt-Lunstad
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2016-06-20

9.  Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships.

Authors:  Edward P Lemay; Margaret S Clark; Brooke C Feeney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-05

Review 10.  Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Timothy B Smith; J Bradley Layton
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

1.  Partner Contributions to Goal Pursuit: Findings From Repeated Daily Life Assessments With Older Couples.

Authors:  Elizabeth Zambrano; Theresa Pauly; Denis Gerstorf; Maureen C Ashe; Kenneth M Madden; Christiane A Hoppmann
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Partner support and goal outcomes during COVID-19: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Laura M Vowels; Katherine B Carnelley; Rachel R R Francois-Walcott
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-05-05

3.  Physiological bases of secure base support provision in a longitudinal study of married older adult couples.

Authors:  Brian Chin; Brooke Feeney
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.348

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.