| Literature DB >> 31368726 |
Jennifer L Tackett1, Joshua D Miller2.
Abstract
As psychological research comes under increasing fire for the crisis of replicability, attention has turned to methods and practices that facilitate (or hinder) a more replicable and veridical body of empirical evidence. These trends have focused on open science initiatives, including an emphasis on replication, transparency, and data sharing. Despite this broader movement in psychology, clinical psychologists and psychiatrists have been largely absent from the broader conversation on documenting the extent of existing problems as well as generating solutions to problematic methods and practices in our area (Tackett et al., 2017). The goal of the current special section was to bring together psychopathology researchers to explore these and related areas as they pertain to the types of research conducted in clinical psychology and allied disciplines. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31368726 DOI: 10.1037/abn0000455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Abnorm Psychol ISSN: 0021-843X