Literature DB >> 31368371

Evidence for managing chronic low back pain in primary care: a review of recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines.

Roberto Meroni1,2, Daniele Piscitelli3, Claudio Ravasio1, Carla Vanti4, Lucia Bertozzi4, Giovanni De Vito1, Cecilia Perin1,2, Andrew A Guccione5, Cesare G Cerri1,2, Paolo Pillastrini4.   

Abstract

AIM: Chronic low back pain represents a major problem throughout the world which is increasing largely because of the aging world population. Clinical practice Guidelines can be powerful tools for promoting evidence-based practice, as they integrate research findings in order to support decision making. This study aimed to review recommendations for the management of Chronic low Back Pain in primary care based on high-quality recent and recently updated Clinical practice Guidelines.
METHODS: CINHAL, PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, Google Scholar, Government websites, Scientific Association websites were searched until April 2019. The retrieved documents underwent several consecutive selection steps: semi-automated duplicate screening, documents selection based on title and abstract screening. Finally, three independent investigators screened the documents for the selected inclusion criteria and reviewed the retrieved documents by means of the AGREE II instrument.
RESULTS: A total of 3055 records were retrieved, of which 10 Clinical practice Guidelines met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of these Clinical practice Guidelines was moderately variable. The recommendations of four Clinical practice Guidelines deemed as "excellent" were extracted and summarized. Although we tried to implement the most comprehensive research strategies, some Clinical practice Guidelines may be missing due to publication bias or incomplete indexing.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a partial progress in respect of the methodological quality of the Clinical practice Guidelines. Several AGREE II domains demonstrated low scores, particularly the "applicability" and "monitoring and auditing criteria" are the domains most susceptible to amendments in future.Implications for rehabilitationClinicians should be aware that among recently published/updated clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic low back pain in primary care only few were deemed to have high quality.Increasing evidence suggests the efficacy for self-management to improve low back pain outcome.Physical treatments are recommended in order to improve low back pain outcome while many physical modalities such as TENS, ultrasound, laser therapy are not.Psychological treatments are recommended and should be included as part of a broader treatment plan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; chronic pain; disability evaluation; practice guideline; primary health care; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368371     DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1645888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

1.  Resolving the Burden of Low Back Pain in Military Service Members and Veterans (RESOLVE): Protocol for a Multisite Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shawn Farrokhi; Elizabeth Russell Esposito; Danielle McPherson; Brittney Mazzone; Rachel Condon; Charity G Patterson; Michael Schneider; Carol M Greco; Anthony Delitto; M Jason Highsmith; Brad D Hendershot; Jason Maikos; Christopher L Dearth
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted?

Authors:  Silvia Gianola; Silvia Bargeri; Michela Cinquini; Valerio Iannicelli; Roberto Meroni; Greta Castellini
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Reliability and validity of the novel self-reported spine functional scale (SSFS) in healthy participants.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jie Ding; Xiujuan Hao; Wenjun Jiang; Hongqiang Song; Yanming Zhang; Yan Tan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Health care providers' understanding of self-management support for people with chronic low back pain in Ethiopia: an interpretive description.

Authors:  Mulugeta Bayisa Chala; Jordan Miller; Setareh Ghahari; Yemataw Wondie; Abey Abebe; Catherine Donnelly
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: An Emerging Therapeutic Target for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Xin He; Chao Zheng; Chengzhe Wang; Pandi Peng; Chu Gao; Xiaolong Xu; Yachao Ma; Mei Liu; Liu Yang; Zhuojing Luo
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-01

6.  Implementing a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for low back pain: a qualitative study of patient and primary care team perspectives.

Authors:  Kyle Vader; Catherine Donnelly; Simon D French; Colleen Grady; Jonathan C Hill; Dean A Tripp; Ashley Williams; Jordan Miller
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-08-11

7.  Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument.

Authors:  G Castellini; V Iannicelli; M Briguglio; D Corbetta; L M Sconfienza; G Banfi; S Gianola
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.