Literature DB >> 31368034

A phase Ib, open-label, dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacology of taselisib (GDC-0032) in combination with either docetaxel or paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative, locally advanced, or metastatic breast cancer.

Vandana G Abramson1, Mafalda Oliveira2, Andrés Cervantes3, Hans Wildiers4, Manish R Patel5,6, Todd M Bauer6, Philippe L Bedard7, Carlos Becerra8, Stephen Richey9, Michael C Wei10, Eric Reyner11, John Bond12, Na Cui13, Timothy R Wilson14, Heather M Moore14, Cristina Saura2, Ian E Krop15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This open-label, phase Ib, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study (NCT01862081) evaluated taselisib with a taxane in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC) and/or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: Patients received taselisib (2-6 mg tablet or 3-6 mg capsule) plus docetaxel or paclitaxel. Primary endpoints were safety, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose, and identification of a recommended phase II dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity assessment.
RESULTS: Eighty patients (BC: 72; NSCLC: 7; BC/NSCLC: 1) were enrolled (docetaxel-receiving arms: 21; paclitaxel-receiving arms: 59). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to death were reported in 90.5%, 42.9%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively (docetaxel-receiving arms), and 78.9%, 40.4%, and 3.5% of patients, respectively (paclitaxel-receiving arms). Eight patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded with 3 mg taselisib (capsule) for 21 consecutive days plus 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and not exceeded with 6 mg taselisib (tablet) for 5 days on/2 days off plus 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Objective response rates and clinical benefit rates were 35.0% and 45.0%, respectively (docetaxel-receiving arms), and 20.4% and 27.8%, respectively (paclitaxel-receiving arms). Exposure for paclitaxel or docetaxel plus taselisib was consistent with the single agents.
CONCLUSIONS: Taselisib in combination with a taxane has a challenging safety profile. Despite evidence of antitumor activity, the benefit-risk profile was deemed not advantageous. Further development is not planned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GDC-0032; Metastatic breast cancer; PI3K; PI3K inhibitor; PIK3CA; Taselisib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368034     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05360-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  2 in total

Review 1.  PI3K Isoform Immunotherapy for Solid Tumours.

Authors:  Jake Scott; Lauren Rees; Awen Gallimore; Sarah N Lauder
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.737

Review 2.  PI3K Inhibitors in Cancer: Clinical Implications and Adverse Effects.

Authors:  Rosalin Mishra; Hima Patel; Samar Alanazi; Mary Kate Kilroy; Joan T Garrett
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.