| Literature DB >> 31367257 |
Er-Bao Chen1,2,3, Zheng-Jun Zhou1,2, Kun Xiao1,2, Gui-Qi Zhu1,2, Yi Yang1,2, Biao Wang1,2, Shao-Lai Zhou1,2,4, Qing Chen1,2, Dan Yin1,2, Zheng Wang1,2,4, Ying-Hong Shi1,2,4, Dong-Mei Gao1,2, Jie Chen1,2, Yan Zhao1,2, Wei-Zhong Wu1,2, Jia Fan1,2,4, Jian Zhou1,2,4, Zhi Dai1,2.
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cell can inhibit tumor initiation and regulates metastatic dissemination, acting as key mediators of the innate immune response. Intrinsic factors modulating NK cells infiltration and its anticancer activity remain poorly characterized. We investigated the roles of dysregulation of micro(mi)RNAs and NK cells in progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Entities:
Keywords: CX3CL1; HCC; NK cell; chemokine; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31367257 PMCID: PMC6643446 DOI: 10.7150/thno.32543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1MiR-561-5p expression was upregulated and positively correlated with pulmonary metastasis in HCCs. (A) A heat map clustering of miRNAs with expression patterns that correlated with pulmonary metastasis in HCCs. (B) Venn diagrams showed that three miRNAs (miR-561-5p, miR-137, miR-149) were overlapped by the three groups. (C) Expression pattern of miR-561-5p in four HCC cell lines that correlated with metastatic potential in HepG2, PLC/PRF/5, MHCC97H, and HCCLM3. (D) Enhanced expression of miR-561-5p in HCCs with pulmonary metastasis (Met) versus HCCs without pulmonary metastasis (No Met) by qRT-PCR. (E) qRT-PCR revealed that miR-561-5p expression was significantly increased in the tumor (T), when compared to corresponding adjacent nontumor tissues (N). The data of (C, D, E) is generated from the sequencing samples by qRT-PCR. (F) Relative miR-561-5p levels in seven different HCC cell lines. (G) The patients suffering from metastasis (Met) exhibited higher miR-561-5p levels compared with patients without metastasis (No Met). (H) qRT-PCR revealed that the expression of miR-561-5p in HCCs was significantly increased in the tumor (T), when compared to corresponding adjacent nontumor tissues (N). The data of (F, G, H) was generated from eight HCC cell lines, and another cohort including 23 paired metastatic tumor and adjacent tissue sample (n=23), and cancer samples without metastasis (n=32)). Data shown are mean±SD from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (*P < 0.05, **P<0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; Student's t-tests).
Figure 2MiR-561-5p enhances tumor outgrowth and pulmonary metastasis of xenograft tumors from two human HCC cell lines. (A) Growth curves of tumors in xenograft nude mouse models are shown compared with empty vector. (B) Representative bioluminescence images of mice show subcutaneous tumors at day 42 after inoculation of HCC cells. The color scale bar depicts the photon flux emitted from these mice. (C) Representative images of H&E staining of metastatic nodules in lungs from different animal groups (left panel). The grades of metastases in each group are indicated (right panel). Data shown are mean±SD (n=6). (*P<0.05; **P<0.01, Student's t-tests).
Figure 3Identification of CX (A) Venn diagrams showing the number of genes identified as potential targets of miR-561-5p according to four groupings: (1) upregulated cytokines in HCCLM3/MHCC97H cells after transfection with anti-miR-561-5p; (2) downregulated cytokines in HepG2/PLC/PRF/5 cells after transfection with miR-561-5p. (B) qRT-PCR validated that knockdown of miR-561-5p in HCCLM3/MHCC97H cells, while miR-561-5p was forced expression in HepG2/PLC/PFR/5 cells. (C) Elisa showed that the expression of CX3CL1 was negatively correlated with the expression of miR-561-5p. (D) Expression of miR-561-5p in HCC tissues with (Met) or without pulmonary metastasis (No Met) was determined by qRT-PCR. (E) Expression of CX3CL1 in tumor tissues (T) was significantly decreased when compared to corresponding adjacent nontumor tissues (N). (F) Sequences of hsa-miR-561-5p and its potential binding site at the 3'UTRs of CX3CL1 are shown and the nucleotides mutated in CX3CL1 3'UTR mutant (upper panel). miR-561-5p significantly suppressed the luciferase activity of CX3CL1 containing a wild-type 3'-UTR, but showed no effect on the activity of CX3CL1 with a mutant 3'-UTR. (lower panel). Luciferase activity was normalized to the activity of β-galactosidase. Data shown are mean±SD from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (*P<0.05; **P<0.01, Student's t-tests).
Figure 4CX (A)CX3CL1 induced concentration-dependent chemotactic migration of NK cells in vitro within the range of 0.0001-100 nM, *P<0.05; **P<0.01 compared with control. (B) Anti-CX3CL1 or anti-CX3CR1 abolished the chemotactic migration of NK cells by CX3CL1. (C) Western blotting showed that CX3CL1 treatment caused s significant increase in the phosphorylation level of STAT3. (D) Chemotactic index of NK cells was measured following stimulation with conditioned medium (CM) derived from different HCC cells compared with other groups. (E) NK cells cytotoxicity showed that CX3CL1 stimulates the NK cytotoxicity by LDH assays. The chemotactic index represents the number of cells that migrated toward the chemoattractant in the lower chamber compared with the negative control. Data shown are mean±SD from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (*P<0.05; **P<0.01, Student's t-tests).
Figure 5MiR-561-5p-CX (A and B) miR-561-5p inhibits NK migration by targeting CX3CL1 in HCCLM3 cells (A) and HepG2 cells (B). (C and D) Representative bioluminescence images of animals, H&E staining of metastatic nodules in lung, and immunostaining of CX3CL1 and NK cells in tumor sample serial sections from xenograft nude mouse models derived from HCCLM3 (C) and HepG2 (D) cells are shown. Data shown are mean±SD from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, Student's t-tests).
Figure 6CX (A) Flow cytometry plots showed CX3CR1+NK cells are abundant in healthy donors' peripheral blood compared with HCC patients. (B) The detailed model diagram was shown. In this study, we pretreated nude mice with 20 uL anti-asialo GM antibodies injected into the tail vein per mouse the day before xenotransplantation, and the antibodies were injected twice a week. We began to inject immune cells and/or antibodies into the tail vein to treat nude mice one week after xenotransplantation, and all nude mice were euthanized after 4 weeks for analysis. Injection of CX3CR1+NK cells or CX3CR1-NK cells resulted in decreased tumor growth (C, E) and pulmonary metastasis (n=5) (D, F), and significantly impaired by co-injection with anti-CX3CL1 or anti-CX3CR1 antibodies. Circles indicate cancer metastasis (magnification, 200X). Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) The pulmonary metastasis of mice with CX3CR1+NK cells showed a smaller rate that that of mice with CX3CR1-NK cells (1/10 vs 6/10). (**P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Student's t-tests, Fisher exact tests).
Figure 7MiR-561-5p-CX. (A) Levels of miR-561-5p, CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+ in representative HCCs primary tumors (left panel) and corresponding pulmonary tumors (right panel). Scale bars, 50x, 200 μm, 200x, 50 μm. (B) qRT-PCR revealed that miR-561-5p expression was significantly increased in pulmonary metastasis (Lung Met), when compared to corresponding primary tumors (Primary HCC). (C) Levels of miR-561-5p, CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+NK in representative HCC patients in TMA are shown. Patient 1 had high-level expression of miR-561-5p and low-level expression of CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+NK, while patient 2 had low-level expression of miR-561-5p and high expression of both CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+NK. (scale bar, 100 μm) (D) Scatterplot depicts a significant inverse correlation between miR-561-5p and CX3CL1 and a significant positive correlation between CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+NKs in cancerous tissues. (E-F) Prognostic values of miR-561-5p, CX3CL1, and CX3CR1+NK by Kaplan-Meier analysis. I, miR-561-5phigh/CX3CL1low/CX3CR1+ NKlow; III, miR-561-5plow/CX3CL1high/CX3CR1+ NKhigh; II, others. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar, 100 μm. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Student's t-tests; log-rank test; Cox proportional hazard regression models).
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors with TTR and OS in HCC (n = 242)
| Variables | TTR | OS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | ||
| Age, years (≤50 vs. >50) | 0.830(0.583-1.180) | 0.299 | 0.986(0.673-1.446) | 0.944 | |
| Sex (female vs. male) | 1.770(0.898-3.486) | 0.099 | 1.854(0.862-3.988) | 0.114 | |
| HBsAg (negative vs. positive) | 1.229(0.788-1.917) | 0.363 | 1.097(0.682-1.766) | 0.703 | |
| AFP, ng/mL (≤20 vs. >20) | 1.722(1.158-2.562) | 1.570(1.026-2.402) | |||
| γ-GT, U/L (≤54 vs. >54) | 1.448(0.987-2.124) | 0.058 | 1.602(1.047-2.450) | ||
| Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) | 1.296(0.910-1.847) | 0.151 | 1.521(1.032-2.242) | ||
| Tumor size, cm (≤5 vs. >5) | 1.469(1.036-2.082) | 2.109(1.441-3.086) | |||
| Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 1.693(1.085-2.644) | 1.142(0.681-1.916) | 0.615 | ||
| Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) | 1.535(1.073-2.196) | 2.013(1.349-3.002) | |||
| Tumor encapsulation (complete vs. none) | 1.337(0.943-1.896) | 0.103 | 1.512(1.039-2.202) | ||
| Tumor differentiation (I+II vs. II+IV) | 1.463(1.000-2.141) | 1.984(1.342-2.931) | |||
| TNM stage (I vs. II III) | 1.501(1.023-2.203) | 2.414(1.511-3.856) | |||
| MiR-561-5p (low vs. high) | 2.281(1.593-3.265) | 2.604(1.750-3.875) | |||
| CX3CL1 (low vs. high) | 0.400(0.278-0.575) | 0.419(0.283-0.621) | |||
| CX3CR1+NK (low vs. high) | 0.558(0.392-0.795) | 0.544(0.371-0.798) | |||
| Combination miR-561-5p, CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+NK | |||||
| I vs. II | 1.928(1.182-3.146) | 1.971(1.140-3.140) | |||
| II vs. III | 1.928(1.182-3.146) | 1.971(1.140-3.410) | |||
| I vs. III | 3.867(2.426-6.165) | 3.987(2.404-6.613) | |||
| AFP, ng/mL (≤20 vs. >20) | 1.342(0.889-2.028) | 0.162 | 1.014(0.650-1.583) | 0.951 | |
| γ-GT, U/L (≤54 vs. >54) | NA | NA | 1.437(0.921-2.243) | 0.110 | |
| Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) | NA | NA | 1.283(0.861-1.911) | 0.220 | |
| Tumor size, cm (≤5 vs. >5) | 1.576(1.098-2.261) | 2.124(1.409-3.200) | |||
| Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 1.77(1.113-2.816) | NA | NA | ||
| Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) | 1.469(1.015-2.127) | 1.874(1.228-2.858) | |||
| Tumor encapsulation (complete vs. none) | NA | NA | 1.369(0.922-2.033) | 0.119 | |
| Tumor differentiation (I+II vs. II+IV) | 1.468(0.989-2.178) | 0.056 | 1.677(1.111-2.533) | ||
| miR-561-5p (low vs. high) | 2.915(1.787-4.754) | 3.659(2.126-6.298) | |||
| CX3CL1 (low vs. high) | 0.355(0.223-0.566) | 0.383(0.229-0.639) | |||
| CX3CR1+NK (low vs. high) | 2.003(1.139-3.520) | 2.206(1.184-4.112) | |||
| Combination miR-561-5p, CX3CL1 and CX3CR1+NK | |||||
| I vs. II | 1.891(1.135-3.151) | 1.817(1.025-3.221) | |||
| II vs. III | 1.811(1.086-3.018) | 1.890(1.136-3.144) | |||
| I vs. III | 4.249(2.645-6.826) | 4.380(2.621-7.319) | |||
Figure 8A Proposed model illustrates the role of the miR-561-5p-CX3CL1- CX3CR1+NK loop in the regulation of HCC metastasis.