Literature DB >> 31365341

Rituximab levels are associated with the B cell homeostasis but not with the clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Cèsar Díaz-Torné1, Maria Àngels Ortiz2, Mónica Sarmiento1,3, César Díaz-López1, Hèctor Corominas1, Jordi Casademont4, Silvia Vidal2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the levels of rituximab (RTX) and anti-RTX antibodies (ARAs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 30, 90, and 180 days after the first infusion, in relation to clinical and serological parameters and B cell homeostasis.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with RA who failed to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy received RTX. At baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the first infusion of RTX, we performed a clinical assessment and determined the levels of RTX, ARAs, B cells, rheumatoid factors, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, immunoglobulins, and complements.
RESULTS: RTX levels varied widely among patients. No ARAs were detected during the follow-up. Patients with lower levels of RTX presented with higher decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, immunoglobulins, and complement 6 months after the first infusion. Patients with higher levels of RTX showed a higher B cell depletion at 90 days but an earlier B cell recovery than those with lower levels of RTX. No differences in clinical response were observed between the two groups at 6 months after starting the treatment.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that RTX levels in the serum of patients with RA are related to B cell homeostasis and the severity of immunological parameters but not to the clinical response at 6 months.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31365341      PMCID: PMC6467324          DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.18109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol        ISSN: 2147-9720


Introduction

Advances in knowledge of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have shown that this disease is not a syndrome as different subsets of patients have different prognoses and responses to treatment. Our greater understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease has also led to the development of biological therapies. One such therapy is rituximab (RTX), a glycosylated chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody directed toward CD20, a pan-B surface marker that depletes B lymphocytes. B cell depletion after RTX treatment differs in distinct diseases, tissues, and from patient to patient (1–2). As in other diseases, such as lymphoma (3), and with other biological therapies (4), higher serum levels of RTX should predict a better B cell depletion and clinical response. However, to date, studies of RTX levels in patients with RA have not found an association between RTX levels and clinical outcomes. None of these studies completed the B cell count or determined RTX levels beyond 3 months. We prospectively analyzed clinical outcomes and B cell and RTX levels in an RA cohort during a complete course of treatment.

Methods

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 34 patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA. Treatment with RTX was started following standard clinical practice. All patients were refractory to treatment with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, and tumor necrosis factor antagonists. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Sant Pau according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written consent was obtained from all patients. Heparinized blood samples were collected on days 0 (baseline, before treatment), 30, 90, and 180 days after the first RTX infusion. Every course cycle consisted of two doses of RTX (1000 mg) 2 weeks apart. Nine patients had minor infusion reactions that required a slower infusion rate, but completed treatment. One patient presented a major infusion. Treatment was terminated, and the patient was excluded. At all visits, we determined erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM), complements (C3 and C4), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs), and RTX and anti-RTX levels.

Flow cytometry

Venous blood was processed for flow cytometry as described previously, within 2 h of collection (5). Monoclonal antibodies used were as follows: Cyto-STAT tetrachrome system lymphocyte cocktail (anti-CD45-FITC/CD4-phycoerythrin (PE)/CD8-PE-Texas red (ECD)/CD3-PE-Cy5) and Natural Killer (NK) cocktail (anti-CD45-FITC/CD19-ECD/CD3-PE-Cy5/CD56-PE) (Beckman Coulter). Analysis was performed on a Cytomics FC 500 using CXP software (Beckman Coulter). Sphero Rainbow Calibration particles (Spherotech, Lake Forest, IL, USA) were used for periodic calibration of channels.

RTX and anti-RTX levels in serum

Sera were tested for RTX (PG-M-127-01-PROMONITOR®-RTX) and anti-RTX levels PG-M-127-02-PROMONITOR®-RTX) using specific ELISAs according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical Analysis

Calculations were performed using Statistical Packages of Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). Results were expressed as mean±SEM. Mann–Whitney U test and Wilcoxon’s test were used for independent and related variables respectively, at different time-points during the follow-up. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 34 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 62.4 (37–81) years, and 93.1% were women. Disease duration was 15.7 (10.7) years. Only 9.09% were RF and ACPA negative. Of the 34 patients, 55.6% were on monotherapy, and 33.3% were on methotrexate.

RTX and anti-RTX levels

As shown in Figure 1, the peak of RTX levels was observed 30 days after initiating treatment. As in previous studies (6–9), RTX levels were highly variable and ranged from 13,000 pg/mL to 115,000 pg/mL. After treatment for 90 days, RTX levels decreased significantly but were detectable in 80% of patients. No RTX was detected on day 180. As in other studies, no anti-RTX antibodies (ARAs) were detected during the follow-up (9).
Figure 1

Rituximab levels evolution from baseline to 180 days after RTX first infusion. RTX levels were highly variable from 13,000 to 115,000 pg/mL. After the first infusion for 90 days, RTX levels were still detectable in 80% of patients

Effects of RTX levels on clinical and laboratory parameters and B cell recovery

To analyze the association between RTX levels and clinical and immunological parameters, patients were segregated into two groups according to RTX levels at 30 days. Patients with RTX levels >56,000 pg/mL (group H: 51.5% of patients) and those with RTX levels <56,000 pg/mL (group L: 48.5% of patients). Patients from both groups were comparable before treatment. As shown in Table 1, decreases in DAS28, CRP, and RF were similar in both groups at 180 days. However, group L patients presented a larger decrease of ESR, IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, and C4.
Table 1

Decrements of clinical and analytical values at 180 days after the first rituximab infusion

Group A (>56,000 pg/mL)Group B (<56,000 pg/mL)p
▼180 DAS281.7±1.31.7±10.96
▼180 ESR (mm/h)
▼180 ESR (mm/h)9.1±9.137.1±80.038
▼180 IgG (mg/dL)3±3.623.3±6.90.018
▼180 IgA (mg/dL)0.8±16.316.3±22.60.092
▼180 IgM (mg/dL)24.2±4.539.2±4.20.03
▼180 RF (UI/mL)56.7±6.453.3±10.90.7
▼180 C3 (mg/dL)−13±4.76±3.70.005
▼180 C4 (mg/dL)−20±4.6−3.7±7.80.07
B cells on day 180 (cells/mL)9.7±3.21.3±0.40.03
As shown in Figure 2, depletion kinetics and recovery of B cells were different in the two groups of patients. Patients from group H showed a greater initial B cell depletion than those from group L. This greater depletion was maintained up to day 90. B cell recovery was significantly faster in group H patients. By day 180, B cells were still depleted in group L (20% of group H patients and 44% of group L patients presented <1 CD19+ cell/mL) (p=0.028).
Figure 2

B cell evolution in both groups. Group with higher levels of rituximab showed earlier peripheral B cell depletion and also an earlier B cell recovery

Discussion

We found that higher decreases of immunological parameters were associated with lower levels of RTX. In addition, the recovery of B cells was delayed in patients with lower levels of RTX. This finding appears to contradict previous studies in patients with lymphoma or lupus treated with RTX that higher levels of RTX in sera were associated with better outcomes and a stronger B cell depletion (3). Differences in RTX levels and in B cell recovery pace between patients with RA and lymphoma are not surprising because doses of the drug and B cell distribution differ significantly in these two diseases. In RA, most active B lymphocytes are found in the germinal centers of the lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, or other similar structures, such as lymphocyte aggregates in the synovium. These were probably memory B cells searching for an environment that favors their stimulation and survival (10). In other biological therapies, higher drug concentrations in the peripheral blood of patients with RA were related to better outcomes (4). However, few groups have studied the RTX levels and the association with clinical or radiological response and B cell depletion in patients with RA. One previous study, with results similar to our own, reported a great variability in serum levels and the highest value on day 30. The authors found that patients with ARAs had lower RTX levels. However, they did not find any association between RTX levels and clinical outcome, radiological progression, or synovial B cell depletion at 12 or 16 weeks (8). Another study observed, as we did, that higher RTX levels were associated with higher peripheral B lymphocyte depletion levels on days 30 and 90 after the first infusion (7). Unfortunately, the authors did not show results further than 90 days, the time when we observed that peripheral B cell recovery began in patients with higher levels of RTX. There are several explanations for highly variable levels of RTX in patients with RA: (1) differences in RTX metabolism, (2) polymorphisms in Fc neonatal receptor, a molecule involved in the recycling of IgG1 (11), and (3) differences in RTX distribution in the body compartments. The complex distribution of RTX in different body compartments could also explain differences among diseases. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging has shown that immediately after the infusion, RTX is located in the spleen and, in a smaller quantity, in the bone marrow. After infusion for 24 h, RTX is mostly located in the thyroid gland. It then spreads through the body in a variable manner (12–13). These findings could explain the total depletion of B cells in the spleen, but not in other compartments, in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14). Based on these data, we speculate that RTX is predominantly distributed in the extravascular compartments in group L patients, consistent with lower RTX levels in the blood. These patients could have a poorer initial B cell depletion in the blood but a better B cell depletion in the germinal centers. Therefore, they could have a higher decrease in immunoglobulins in the peripheral blood. In addition, poorer initial depletion of B cells could induce lower levels of B cell activating factor (15), thus delaying B cell recovery in group L patients. This hypothesis could also explain why the treatment response in patients with RA with higher levels of RTX in sera was comparable with those with lower levels of RTX. It also could suggest that patients with lower RTX levels could be candidates of RTX treatment on demand instead of every 6 months. More studies should be conducted to clarify this issue.
  15 in total

1.  Bone marrow B-lineage cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis following rituximab therapy.

Authors:  M J Leandro; N Cooper; G Cambridge; M R Ehrenstein; J C W Edwards
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Serum rituximab levels and efficiency of B cell depletion: differences between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Venkat Reddy; Sara Croca; Delia Gerona; Inmaculada De La Torre; David Isenberg; Vickie McDonald; Maria Leandro; Geraldine Cambridge
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Patients non-responding to etanercept obtain lower etanercept concentrations compared with responding patients.

Authors:  A Jamnitski; C L Krieckaert; M T Nurmohamed; M H Hart; B A Dijkmans; L Aarden; A E Voskuyl; G J Wolbink
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Progression of structural damage is not related to rituximab serum levels in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Maria Boumans; Onno Teng; Rogier Thurlings; Johannes Bijlsma; Danielle Gerlag; Tom Huizinga; Koen Vos; Steven Stapel; Gertjan Wolbink; Janneke Tekstra; Jaap van Laar; Paul P Tak
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  CD20 antigen imaging with ¹²⁴I-rituximab PET/CT in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L Tran; A D R Huitema; M H van Rijswijk; H J Dinant; J W Baars; J H Beijnen; W V Vogel
Journal:  Hum Antibodies       Date:  2011

6.  The pharmacokinetics of ¹²⁴I-rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L Tran; W V Vogel; M Sinaasappel; S Muller; J W Baars; M van Rijswijk; H J Dinant; J H Beijnen; A D R Huitema
Journal:  Hum Antibodies       Date:  2011

7.  Clinical response, pharmacokinetics, development of human anti-chimaeric antibodies, and synovial tissue response to rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R M Thurlings; O Teng; K Vos; D M Gerlag; L Aarden; S O Stapel; J M van Laar; P P Tak; G J Wolbink
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Rituximab-induced changes in hematolymphoid tissues found at autopsy.

Authors:  Adina M Cioc; Steven M Vanderwerf; Bruce A Peterson; Valentin G Robu; Colleen L Forster; Stefan E Pambuccian
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 9.  Understanding the mechanistic basis in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical response to anti-CD20 therapy: the B-cell roadblock hypothesis.

Authors:  Gregg J Silverman; David L Boyle
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.988

10.  Synovial tissue response to rituximab: mechanism of action and identification of biomarkers of response.

Authors:  R M Thurlings; K Vos; C A Wijbrandts; A H Zwinderman; D M Gerlag; P P Tak
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  1 in total

1.  Altered splenic [89Zr]Zr-rituximab uptake in patients with interstitial lung disease not responding to rituximab: could this indicate a splenic immune-mediated mechanism?

Authors:  Human Adams; Bob Meek; Ewoudt Mw van de Garde; Coline Hm van Moorsel; Danielle J Vugts; Ruth G Keijsers; Jan C Grutters
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.