Literature DB >> 31365241

Aging Effects on Biomass Burning Aerosol Mass and Composition: A Critical Review of Field and Laboratory Studies.

Anna L Hodshire1, Ali Akherati2, Matthew J Alvarado3, Benjamin Brown-Steiner3, Shantanu H Jathar2, Jose L Jimenez4, Sonia M Kreidenweis1, Chantelle R Lonsdale3, Timothy B Onasch5, Amber M Ortega6, Jeffrey R Pierce1.   

Abstract

Biomass burning is a major source of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) with impacts on health, climate, and air quality. The particles and vapors within biomass burning plumes undergo chemical and physical aging as they are transported downwind. Field measurements of the evolution of PM with plume age range from net decreases to net increases, with most showing little to no change. In contrast, laboratory studies tend to show significant mass increases on average. On the other hand, similar effects of aging on the average PM composition (e.g., oxygen-to-carbon ratio) are reported for lab and field studies. Currently, there is no consensus on the mechanisms that lead to these observed similarities and differences. This review summarizes available observations of aging-related biomass burning aerosol mass concentrations and composition markers, and discusses four broad hypotheses to explain variability within and between field and laboratory campaigns: (1) variability in emissions and chemistry, (2) differences in dilution/entrainment, (3) losses in chambers and lines, and (4) differences in the timing of the initial measurement, the baseline from which changes are estimated. We conclude with a concise set of research needs for advancing our understanding of the aging of biomass burning aerosol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31365241     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Spectrally dependent linear depolarization and lidar ratios for nonspherical smoke aerosols.

Authors:  Li Liu; Michael I Mishchenko
Journal:  J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Biomass combustion produces ice-active minerals in biomass-burning aerosol and bottom ash.

Authors:  Leif G Jahn; Michael J Polen; Lydia G Jahl; Thomas A Brubaker; Joshua Somers; Ryan C Sullivan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rate of atmospheric brown carbon whitening governed by environmental conditions.

Authors:  Elijah G Schnitzler; Nealan G A Gerrebos; Therese S Carter; Yuanzhou Huang; Colette L Heald; Allan K Bertram; Jonathan P D Abbatt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel A Jaffe; Susan M O'Neill; Narasimhan K Larkin; Amara L Holder; David L Peterson; Jessica E Halofsky; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  On the stratospheric chemistry of midlatitude wildfire smoke.

Authors:  Susan Solomon; Kimberlee Dube; Kane Stone; Pengfei Yu; Doug Kinnison; Owen B Toon; Susan E Strahan; Karen H Rosenlof; Robert Portmann; Sean Davis; William Randel; Peter Bernath; Chris Boone; Charles G Bardeen; Adam Bourassa; Daniel Zawada; Doug Degenstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Using modelled relationships and satellite observations to attribute modelled aerosol biases over biomass burning regions.

Authors:  Qirui Zhong; Nick Schutgens; Guido R van der Werf; Twan van Noije; Susanne E Bauer; Kostas Tsigaridis; Tero Mielonen; Ramiro Checa-Garcia; David Neubauer; Zak Kipling; Alf Kirkevåg; Dirk J L Olivié; Harri Kokkola; Hitoshi Matsui; Paul Ginoux; Toshihiko Takemura; Philippe Le Sager; Samuel Rémy; Huisheng Bian; Mian Chin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Wildland Fire Emission Sampling at Fishlake National Forest, Utah Using an Unmanned Aircraft System.

Authors:  J Aurell; B Gullett; A Holder; F Kiros; W Mitchell; A Watts; R Ottmar
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes.

Authors:  Lu Xu; John D Crounse; Krystal T Vasquez; Hannah Allen; Paul O Wennberg; Ilann Bourgeois; Steven S Brown; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; Matthew M Coggon; James H Crawford; Joshua P DiGangi; Glenn S Diskin; Alan Fried; Emily M Gargulinski; Jessica B Gilman; Georgios I Gkatzelis; Hongyu Guo; Johnathan W Hair; Samuel R Hall; Hannah A Halliday; Thomas F Hanisco; Reem A Hannun; Christopher D Holmes; L Gregory Huey; Jose L Jimenez; Aaron Lamplugh; Young Ro Lee; Jin Liao; Jakob Lindaas; J Andrew Neuman; John B Nowak; Jeff Peischl; David A Peterson; Felix Piel; Dirk Richter; Pamela S Rickly; Michael A Robinson; Andrew W Rollins; Thomas B Ryerson; Kanako Sekimoto; Vanessa Selimovic; Taylor Shingler; Amber J Soja; Jason M St Clair; David J Tanner; Kirk Ullmann; Patrick R Veres; James Walega; Carsten Warneke; Rebecca A Washenfelder; Petter Weibring; Armin Wisthaler; Glenn M Wolfe; Caroline C Womack; Robert J Yokelson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 14.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.