Literature DB >> 3136502

Family planning for teens: strategies for improving outreach and service delivery in public health settings.

E J Herz1, L M Olson, J S Reis.   

Abstract

The persistent underuse of family planning services by inner-city, low-income, sexually active youth underscores the importance of testing innovative programs that maximize participation. Presented in this paper is an analysis of a Chicago public health clinic's special program for adolescents that originated from the staff's observations of the scheduling, educational, and support needs of teens seeking family planning services from a traditionally managed public health facility. Between December 1982, when the special program--the Teen Clinic--was implemented, and March 1985, more than 600 adolescents sought social support and contraceptive services--an 82 percent increase in new-patient registration compared with the enrollment before the program began. In contrast, two neighboring public health department facilities without special family planning programs for teens experienced either a small increase, 4 percent, or a modest decrease, 17 percent, in utilization by teenagers during the same period. The increased use of the study facility by teens, coupled with patients' self-reported nonuse of alternative sources of care and referral patterns, suggests that the new program was successful in recruiting sexually active teens who had previously been inadequately protected against pregnancy. The perceived institutional and interpersonal factors influencing 153 teens' initial and repeated use of the Teen Clinic, as measured by a structured survey, echo the findings of previous research. Strategies suggested by the study's findings for improving outreach and service delivery are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3136502      PMCID: PMC1478089     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  The influence of client-provider relationships on teenage women's subsequent use of contraception.

Authors:  C A Nathanson; M H Becker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Institutional factors affecting teenagers' choice and reasons for delay in attending a family planning clinic.

Authors:  L S Zabin; S D Clark
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb

3.  Evaluation of programs for adolescents.

Authors:  J F Jekel
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1981

4.  Factors affecting adolescents' use of family planning clinics.

Authors:  M Chamie; S Eisman; J D Forrest; M T Orr; A Torres
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1982 May-Jun

5.  Adolescents' Use of a hospital-based contraceptive program.

Authors:  J B Jones; P B Namerow; S Philliber
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug

6.  Why they delay: a study of teenage family planning clinic patients.

Authors:  L S Zabin; S D Clark
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct

7.  Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1983.

Authors:  A Torres; J D Forrest
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

8.  The effectiveness of family planning clinics in serving adolescents.

Authors:  E E Kisker
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Teen Access and Quality Initiative: Improving Adolescent Reproductive Health Best Practices in Publicly Funded Health Centers.

Authors:  Anna W Brittain; Heather D Tevendale; Trisha Mueller; Aniket D Kulkarni; Dawn Middleton; Michela L B Garrison; Mary R Read-Wahidi; Emilia H Koumans
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-06

Review 2.  Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna W Brittain; Jessica R Williams; Lauren B Zapata; Karen Pazol; Lisa M Romero; Tasmeen S Weik
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review Update.

Authors:  Anna W Brittain; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Emily Decker; Julia M Rollison; Nikita M Malcolm; Lisa M Romero; Emilia H Koumans
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.