Literature DB >> 3136494

Are condom instructions readable? Results of a readability study.

G A Richwald1, M A Wamsley, A H Coulson, D E Morisky.   

Abstract

The use of condoms has assumed a central position in the current strategy to prevent sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus. The effectiveness of condoms in disease prophylaxis is dependent, to a degree, on their correct use. Condom manufacturers routinely include information on condom use either printed on the actual package or in an enclosed package insert. With the use of three readability formulas, the reading grade level was determined for 14 different sets of instructions included with 25 brands of condoms manufactured by 7 domestic and 1 overseas manufacturer. The readability formulas, when applied to instructions for condom use, estimated that, conservatively, 8 of the 14 instructions required at least reading at the level of a high school graduate and none required less than a 10th grade level. Clearly written instructions and simple concepts could assist current and future condom users in the correct use of condoms and improve the effectiveness of condoms in the prevention of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3136494      PMCID: PMC1478107     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  11 in total

1.  AIDS and the condom.

Authors:  K Wellings
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-15

2.  Education to prevent AIDS: prospects and obstacles.

Authors:  H V Fineberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-02-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Condoms, spermicides, and the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus: a review of the literature.

Authors:  P J Feldblum; J A Fortney
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Surgeon General's report on acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  C E Koop
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The condom barrier.

Authors:  N E Dirubbo
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.220

6.  Sex in the age of AIDS calls for common sense and 'condom sense'.

Authors:  M F Goldsmith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Assessing the readability of health education messages.

Authors:  V S Freimuth
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  G H Friedland; R S Klein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Personal protection against sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  K M Stone; D A Grimes; L S Magder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  The prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in the United States. An objective strategy for medicine, public health, business, and the community.

Authors:  D P Francis; J Chin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Low health literacy is associated with HIV test acceptance.

Authors:  Maribel Barragán; Giselle Hicks; Mark V Williams; Carlos Franco-Paredes; Wayne Duffus; Carlos del Rio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Materials and strategies that work in low literacy health communication.

Authors:  S Plimpton; J Root
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Patient literacy. A barrier to quality of care.

Authors:  D L Roter; R E Rudd; J Comings
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A study of the deficiencies in the condom-use skills of gay men.

Authors:  D J Martin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  The Stanford Nutrition Action Program: a dietary fat intervention for low-literacy adults.

Authors:  B Howard-Pitney; M A Winkleby; C L Albright; B Bruce; S P Fortmann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.308

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.