| Literature DB >> 31363396 |
Nazanin Arbabzadegan1, Ali Akbar Moghadamnia2, Sohrab Kazemi3, Farideh Nozari1, Ehsan Moudi4, Sina Haghanifar4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a common disease of old age. The present study used digital radiography to determine the effects of equisetum arvense extract on the bone mineral density (BMD) of experimental rats.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mineral density; Digital radiography.; Equisetum arvense; Osteoporosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31363396 PMCID: PMC6619477 DOI: 10.22088/cjim.10.2.176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Caspian J Intern Med ISSN: 2008-6164
Figure 1The measurement of rats’ maxillary and mandibular BMD using Radiography
The main components of equisetum arvense obtained from a chemical fingerprint
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.696 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde | 6.093% |
| 2 | 11.390 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural | 27.032% |
| 3 | 13.295 | 4-(Ethoxymethyl)phenol | 1.365% |
| 4 | 14.382 | ursolic acid | 32.918% |
| 5 | 22.370 | 1-Oxaspiro[2.5]oct-5-ene | 2.508% |
| 6 | 25.574 | oleanolic acid | 10.855% |
| 7 | 26.072 | betulinic acid | 3.624% |
| 8 | 27.926 | Borane | 2.075% |
| 9 | 33.517 | Phosphorus trifluoride | 2.222% |
| 10 | 34.180 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | 2.772% |
Figure 1The results of GC-MS test
Mean levels of BMD and serum calcium, vit D and phosphorus levels before and after 30 days
|
|
| Group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 196.85±2.66 | 177.5 ± 6.76 | 24.7 ± 5.88 | 7.58±0.92 | 9.03±0.31 | 189.28 ± 3.3 | 173.12±5.54 | 25.85±13.2 | 9.42±0.52 | 8.88±0.96 | Male, control |
| 188.0 ± 2.18 | 168.0±3.81 | 63.54±18.76 | 7.04±0.65 | 8.86±0.29 | 188.2 ± 1.79 | 171.52±2.46 | 28.62±1.82 | 10.32±0.49 | 9.76 ±0.33 | Female, control |
| 198.85±2.16 | 175.25±2.92 | 61.7 ± 15.85 | 7.35±0.42 | 8.93±0.13 | 185.2 ± 2.87 | 170.12±2.66 | 18.4 ± 3.23 | 10.85±0.66 | 9.93 ±0.28 | Male, Calcium/VitaminD |
| 195.4 ± 3.59 | 174.04±2.09 | 52.07±45.35 | 6.43±0.35 | 8.95±0.13 | 188.1 ± 3.13 | 174.6 ±6.43 | 29.75±6.93 | 9.18±0.94 | 9.88±0.31 | Female, Calcium/VitaminD |
| 196.44±1.86 | 170.28±2.46 | 23.47 ± 6.49 | 8.6 ± 1.66 | 9.47±0.25 | 184.64 ± 3.04 | 167.56±1.69 | 24.9±12.39 | 10.03±0.05 | 10.35±0.3 | Male, 60 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| 193.44±3.31 | 171.36±4.34 | 31.58 ± 8.51 | 6.78±0.54 | 8.56±0.52 | 187.68 ± 2.0 | 168.88±1.22 | 23.04±1.99 | 9.62±0.43 | 10.14±0.75 | Female, 60 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| 198.7 ± 5.18 | 176.5 ± 4.87 | 23.95 ± 8.43 | 7.88±0.22 | 8.73±0.43 | 182.84 ± 2.64 | 169.88±1.72 | 18.72±1.92 | 9.62±0.97 | 10.06±0.55 | Male, 90 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| 195.0 ± 4.07 | 174.3 ± 1.55 | 42.34 ± 4.23 | 6.32±0.65 | 9.18±0.28 | 190.32 ± 2.99 | 173.56±2.74 | 28.16±6.87 | 10.22±0.84 | 9.22±0.31 | Female, 90 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| 193.36±3.21 | 169.6 ± 1.91 | 39.16 ± 4.98 | 6.78±0.73 | 8.42±0.56 | 177.56 ± 4.32 | 161.4±6.62 | 32.02 ± 4.1 | 9.78±0.76 | 9.18±0.28 | Male, 120 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| 197.4±13.03 | 179.0±17.03 | 18.83 ± 0.29 | 8.77±0.55 | 8.93±0.25 | 178.52 ± 3.64 | 163.52±3.95 | 28.32±7.69 | 9.97±1.11 | 9.2 ±0.51 | Female, 120 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
The mean levels maxillary and mandibular BMD at baseline and after 30 days are shown in figures 3 and 4. According to the results of the Tukey test, the mean difference in serum vitamin D in the calcium/vitamin D group was significantly higher than in the control group and the groups receiving equisetum arvense extract (p<0.05). The maxillary BMD decreased in animals receiving 60 and 90 mg/kg equisetum arvense in comparison with the control group and the group receiving calcium/vitamin D but these reductions were not significant and an increase in 120 mg/kg equisetum arvense group was not significant.
These groups are shared with a research project (code no: 964505) conducted at the Babol University of Medical Sciences.
Mean and standard error of changes in vitamin D levels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.001 | 5.35 | 21.51 | Calcium/Vitamin D | Control |
| NS | 5.16 | 12.78 | 60 mg/kg | Control |
| NS | 5.0 | 11.19 | 90 mg/kg | Control |
| NS | 5.16 | 12.83 | 120 mg/kg | Control |
| 0.001 | 5.49 | 34.29 | 60 mg/kg | Calcium/Vitamin D |
| 0.001 | 5.35 | 32.7 | 90 mg/kg | Calcium/Vitamin D |
| 0.001 | 5.49 | 34.34 | 120 mg/kg | Calcium/Vitamin D |
| NS | 5.16 | 1.59 | 90 mg/kg | 60 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| NS | 5.31 | 0.05 | 120 mg/kg | 60 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| NS | 5.16 | 1.64 | 120 mg/kg | 90 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
= Not significant
Mean and standard error of changes in the mandibular BMD of rats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NS | 3.59 | 6.37 | Calcium/Vitamin D | Control |
| NS | 3.4 | 4.45 | 60 mg/kg | Control |
| NS | 3.59 | 5.22 | 90 mg/kg | Control |
| 0.01 | 3.48 | 13.16 | 120 mg/kg | Control |
| NS | 3.5 | 1.92 | 60 mg/kg | Calcium/Vitamin D |
| NS | 3.69 | 1.15 | 90 mg/kg | Calcium/Vitamin D |
| NS | 3.59 | 6.79 | 120 mg/kg | Calcium/Vitamin D |
| NS | 3.5 | 0.77 | 90 mg/kg | 60 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| NS | 3.4 | 8.71 | 120 mg/kg | 60 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
| NS | 3.59 | 7.94 | 120 mg/kg | 90 mg/kg Equisetum Arvense |
= Not significant
Figure 3The mean levels of mandibular BMD at baseline and after 30 days
Figure 4The mean levels of maxillary BMD at baseline and after 30 days