| Literature DB >> 31363166 |
Jan Styczynski1, Gloria Tridello2, Lidia Gil3, Per Ljungman4,5, Malgorzata Mikulska6, Katherine N Ward7, Catherine Cordonnier8, Rafael de la Camara9, Diana Averbuch10, Nina Knelange11, Gerard Socié12, Patrice Chevallier13, Didier Blaise14, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha15, Edouard Forcade16, Jan Cornelissen17, Johan Maertens18, Eefke Petersen19, Stéphanie Nguyen-Quoc20, Hendrik Veelken21, Nicolaas Schaap22, Jakob Passweg23, Mauricette Michallet24, Nathalie Fegueux25, Eric Deconinck26, Nigel Russell27, Grzegorz Basak28, Peter Bader29, Silvia Montoto30, Nicolaus Kröger31, Simone Cesaro2.
Abstract
The influence of the donor (D) and recipient (R) pre-transplant Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) serostatus on transplant outcomes (overall survival, relapse-free survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, acute and chronic GVHD) in 12,931 patients with lymphomas or chronic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) between 1997-2016 was analyzed. In multivariate analysis, the risk of development of chronic GVHD was increased for EBV R+/D+ (HR = 1.26; p = 0.003), R+/D- (HR = 1.21; p = 0.044), and R-/D + (HR = 1.21; p = 0.048) in comparison to R-/D- transplants. No significance was shown for other transplant outcomes; however, in univariate analysis, EBV-seropositive patients receiving grafts from EBV-seropositive donors (EBV R+/D+transplants) had inferior transplant outcomes in comparison to EBV-seronegative recipients of grafts from EBV-seronegative donors (EBV R-/D-): inferior overall survival (59.6% vs 65.9%), inferior relapse-free survival (51.1% vs 57.5%), increased incidence of chronic GVHD (49.5% vs 41.8%), and increased incidence of de novo chronic GVHD (30.5% vs 24.0%). In conclusion, an EBV-negative recipient with lymphoma or chronic malignancy can benefit from selection of an EBV-negative donor in context of chronic GVHD, while there are no preferences in donor EBV serostatus for EBV-seropositive recipient.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31363166 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0627-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483