| Literature DB >> 31363111 |
Luis A González-García1, Santiago F Caballero-Benítez1,2,3, Rosario Paredes4.
Abstract
We investigate the effects of disorder and lattice geometry against localisation phenomena in a weakly interacting ultracold bosonic gas confined in a 2D optical lattice. The behaviour of the quantum fluid is studied at the mean-field level performing computational experiments, as a function of disorder strength for lattices of sizes similar to current experiments. Quantification of localisation, away from the Bose glass phase, was obtained directly from the stationary density profiles through a robust statistical analysis of the condensate component, as a function of the disorder amplitude. Our results show a smooth transition, or crossover, to localisation induced by disorder in square and triangular lattices. In contrast, associated to its larger tunneling amplitude, honeycomb lattices show absence of localisation for the same range of disorder strengths and same lattice amplitude, while also exhibiting partial localisation for large disorder amplitudes. We also conclude that the coordination number z have a partial influence on how fast this smooth transition occurs as the system size increases. Signatures of disorder are also found in the ground state energy spectrum, where a continuous distribution emerges instead of a distribution of sharp peaks proper to the system in the absence of disorder.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31363111 PMCID: PMC6667487 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47279-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the two dimensional square disordered lattice potential.
Figure 2Correlation function between nearest neighbours g1 as a function of δ for the hexagonal (z = 3), square (z = 4) and triangular (z = 6) lattices. Error bars in this figure are associated to the ensemble of 50 realisations for each value of δ.
Figure 3Fragments of the density profiles for honeycomb, square and triangular lattices with a disorder amplitude δ = 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 with lattice sizes Ω ~ 103. Parameters are: V0 = 12E, U = 0.01E, spacing is in units of the lattice constant a. The bright regions correspond to density maxima while dark regions absence of SF.
Figure 4Average of the peaks heights 〈h〉 (top) and the peak fraction p (bottom) as a function of disorder δ in units of E. 〈h〉 is normalised to the largest height amplitude. Blue, purple and black symbols correspond to honeycomb (z = 3), square (z = 4) and triangular (z = 6) lattices respectively. Parameters are: Ω ~ 103, V0 = 12E (solid lines) and V0 = 24E (dashed line for honeycomb), U = 0.01E, with ~50 disorder realisations at each data point, the bars denote the standard deviation for each ensemble of disorder amplitude δ. The honeycomb lattice with V0 = 24E (dashed blue) and the square lattice with V0 = 12E (solid purple) have equivalent tunneling amplitudes in the tight binding limit, see the main text for details. The continuous lines for 〈h〉 are given for triangular and square by: 1 + exp (b0 + b1δ + b2δ2), with parameters (triangular, square): b0,Latt = (−12.53, −7.84), b1,Latt = (31.42, 19.98), and b2,Latt = (−15.58, −8.61). For the honeycomb lattice, 〈h〉 ≈ 1 for with V0 = 12E; for V0 = 24E, b0, = −26.04, b1, = 54.58, and b2, = −25.68. The solid lines for p are given by: 1 − αδ2 for and A exp (β1δ + β2δ2 + β3δ3 + β4δ4) for δ > δ. The fitting parameters are for V0 = 12E (triangular, square, honeycomb): αLatt = (0.29, 0.022, 0.00051), δ ≈ (0.3, 0.3, 0.6), ALatt = (1.023, 0.98, 0.99), β1,Latt = (1.26, 0.0, 0.21), β2,Latt = (−4.17, 3.59, −0.34), β3,Latt = (−1.93, −11.52, 0.005), β4,Latt = 0.0. For the honeycomb lattice with V0 = 24E, α = 0.006, δ ≈ 0.4, A = 0.98, β1, = 0, β2, = 0.69, β3, = 0, β4, = −3.64.
Figure 5Normalized fraction of peaks as a function of the lattice size Ω. The values of the disorder amplitude are δ = 20% (blue), 60% (purple), 80% (black) of the potential depth V0 = 12E. From top to bottom panels correspond to honeycomb, square and triangular lattices respectively. Interestingly, the honeycomb lattice (z = 3) is resilient towards disorder induced localisation, as compared to other geometries with more nearest neighbours (z = 4, 6). The fitted lines different from p ~ 1 are given by: p ~ B exp (−cΩ) + D. For honeycomb: δ = 0.8, (B, D, c) = (0.42, 0.8, 0.0017). For square: δ = 0.6, (0.51, 0.03, 0.00073); δ = 0.8, (0.16, 0.0072, 0.00097). For triangular: δ = 0.8, (0.72, 0.15, 0.0023); δ = 0.8, (0.26, 0.06, 0.0037).
Figure 6Energy spectrum in reciprocal space for honeycomb (top row), square (middle row) and triangular (bottom row) lattices in arbitrary units. Left and right columns correspond to disorder amplitudes of δ = 0 and δ = 80% of the potential depth V0 = 12E respectively. Each of the energy spectra on the right column is the average over ~50 realizations for a given disorder amplitude. The inset in each panel shows the corresponding density plot of the energy spectrum in the Brillouin zone.