| Literature DB >> 31362903 |
Masachika Saeki1, Toyotaka Sato2, Daisuke Furuya3, Yuki Yakuwa1, Yuki Sato1, Ryo Kobayashi1, Mayumi Ono1, Shinya Nirasawa1, Makito Tanaka1, Hirotaka Nakafuri1, Mami Nakae4, Masaaki Shinagawa3, Kouichi Asanuma1, Nozomi Yanagihara5, Shin-Ichi Yokota2, Satoshi Takahashi6.
Abstract
Escherichia coli (E. coli) causes urinary tract infections, pneumonia, surgical site infections, and bloodstream infections and is the important pathogen for both community-acquired and healthcare-associated infections. To investigate the clonality of E. coli is important for infection control and prevention. We aimed to investigate the clonality of clinical E. coli isolates using Cica Geneus E. coli polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based open-reading frame typing (POT) KIT and clarify the clinical usefulness of this kit. About 124 E. coli isolates obtained from inpatients at Sapporo Medical University Hospital were used. The POT method was used to classify 124 clinical isolates into 87 POT numbers. In addition to the clonality, it was possible to obtain additional information that 20 of the 124 isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli (5 isolates of CTX-M-1 group and 15 isolates of CTX-M-9 group) and 13 were sequence type (ST) 131 clone. Furthermore, when these ESBL-producing 20 isolates were compared with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or multilocus sequence typing (MLST), Simpson's index of diversity was 0.968 in POT method, 0.979 in PFGE, and 0.584 in MLST. POT method had an analytical power similar to that of PFGE. In conclusion, attention should be paid to the difference in the interpretation of the results between the POT method and the PFGE, but POT method may be useful to timely monitor the spread of E. coli in medical facilities.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; Extended-spectrum β-lactamase; Multilocus sequence typing; Polymerase chain reaction-based open-reading frame typing; Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; Sequence type 131
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31362903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.06.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Chemother ISSN: 1341-321X Impact factor: 2.211