Literature DB >> 31362328

Single-Center Study: Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Pregnant Women to Assess Hepatic Lesions.

Vincent Schwarze1, Constantin Marschner1, Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo1, Johannes Rübenthaler1, Dirk-André Clevert1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is an essential imaging tool for evaluating physiological and pathological fetal or maternal conditions during pregnancy. Published data is limited with respect to the application of CEUS during pregnancy. CEUS has already been safely applied for assessing uteroplacental blood flow, cesarean scar pregnancy and invasive placenta percreta. CT and MRI scans during pregnancy must be thoroughly evaluated due to harmful ionizing radiation and cerebral gadolinium deposition, respectively.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of CEUS during pregnancy to evaluate hepatic lesions of unknown entity.
METHODS: 6 pregnant patients who underwent CEUS between 2005 and 2014 (mean age: 32 years; mean weeks of pregnancy: 28 weeks) were included in this study. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood-pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by a single radiologist with experience since 2000 (EFSUMB Level 3).
RESULTS: CEUS was safely performed on all included pregnant women without the occurrence of adverse fetal or maternal events. In the context of the present study, CEUS helped to safely differentiate hepatic metastases, focal nodular hyperplasia, atypical hemangioma, hepatic arteriovenous malformation and cystic echinococcosis. In two patients CEUS determined immediate therapy.
CONCLUSION: Although not clinically approved in obstetrics so far, CEUS is a safe imaging modality which, in addition to B-mode and color Doppler ultrasonography, may be applied during pregnancy for further medical indications and to provide helpful information. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362328     DOI: 10.1055/a-0973-8517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  10 in total

1.  Single-center study: dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnostic assessment of carotid body tumors.

Authors:  Vincent Schwarze; Constantin Marschner; Giovanna Negrao De Figueiredo; Michael Ingrisch; Johannes Rübenthaler; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-09

2.  Comparison of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) quantified with ImageJ to quantified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (qCEUS) in liver metastases-a pilot study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kratzer; Melanie Güthle; Felix Dobler; Thomas Seufferlein; Tilmann Graeter; Julian Schmidberger; Thomas Fe Barth; Jochen Klaus
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

3.  Newly detected liver nodules with a history of colorectal cancer: are they metastatic? Review of 2,632 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Kai Zhu; Wentao Wang; Rongkui Luo; Danjun Song; Xi Wang; Qiang Gao; Jia Fan; Jian Zhou; Shengxiang Rao; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

4.  Diagnostic criteria of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk individuals: how is late washout determined?

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Kang; Jung Hoon Kim; Jeongin Yoo; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2021-12-17

5.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 234 patients.

Authors:  Vincent Schwarze; Constantin Marschner; Wiebke Völckers; Sergio Grosu; Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo; Johannes Rübenthaler; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion in humans.

Authors:  Anna L Emanuel; Rick I Meijer; Erik van Poelgeest; Pien Spoor; Erik H Serné; Etto C Eringa
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography with Regard to the Further Therapy Regime and Patient Outcome-A Single-Center Experience in an Interdisciplinary Uroradiological Setting.

Authors:  Constantin A Marschner; Vincent Schwarze; Regina Stredele; Matthias F Froelich; Johannes Rübenthaler; Thomas Geyer; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Assessing Abdominal Conditions in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Johannes Rübenthaler; Matthias F Froelich; Laura Sabel; Constantin Marschner; Vincent Schwarze; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for interventional procedures.

Authors:  Constantin Arndt Marschner; Johannes Rübenthaler; Matthias Frank Froelich; Vincent Schwarze; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-11-19

10.  Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Focal Splenic Lesions.

Authors:  Rui Yang; Qiang Lu; Jinshun Xu; Jiayan Huang; Binyang Gao; Huan Zhang; Jie Zhou; Lanxin Du; Feng Yan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.