Literature DB >> 31362152

The two faces of nanomaterials: A quantification of hormesis in algae and plants.

Evgenios Agathokleous1, ZhaoZhong Feng2, Ivo Iavicoli3, Edward J Calabrese4.   

Abstract

The rapid progress in nanotechnology has dramatically promoted the application of engineered nanomaterials in numerous sectors. The wide application of nanomaterials and the potential accumulation in the environment sparked interest in studying the effects of nanomaterials on algae and plants. Hormesis is a dose response phenomenon characterized by a biphasic dose response with a low dose stimulation and a high dose inhibition. This paper quantifies for the first time nanomaterial-induced hormesis in algae and plants. Five hundred hormetic concentration-response relationships were mined from the published literature. The median maximum stimulatory response (MAX) was 123%, and commonly below 200%, of control response. It was also lower in algae than in plants, and occurred commonly at concentrations <100 mg L-1. The no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) to MAX ratio was 2.4 for algae and 1.7 for plants, and the two distributions differed significantly. Ag nanoparticles induced higher MAX than TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. The MAX varied upon nanomaterial application methods, growth stage of application (seed versus vegetative), type of endpoint and time window. While nanomaterial size did not affect significantly the MAX, sizes ≤50 nm appeared to have lower NOAEL:MAX ratio than sizes ≥100 nm, suggesting higher risks from incorrect application. The mechanisms underlying nanomaterial-induced hormetic concentration responses are discussed. This paper provides a strong foundation for enhancing research protocols of studies on nanomaterial effects on algae and plants as well as for incorporating hormesis into the risk assessment practices.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural sustainability; Environmental pollution; Hormesis; Nanoparticles; Preconditioning; Priming

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362152     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  10 in total

Review 1.  Exogenous application of chemicals for protecting plants against ambient ozone pollution: What should come next?

Authors:  Costas J Saitanis; Evgenios Agathokleous
Journal:  Curr Opin Environ Sci Health       Date:  2020-10-14

2.  Seed Gamma Irradiation of Arabidopsis thaliana ABA-Mutant Lines Alters Germination and Does Not Inhibit the Photosynthetic Efficiency of Juvenile Plants.

Authors:  Darya Babina; Marina Podobed; Ekaterina Bondarenko; Elizaveta Kazakova; Sofia Bitarishvili; Mikhail Podlutskii; Anastasia Mitsenyk; Alexander Prazyan; Irina Gorbatova; Ekaterina Shesterikova; Polina Volkova
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Aquatic toxicity of particulate matter emitted by five electroplating processes in two marine microalgae species.

Authors:  Konstantin Pikula; Konstantin Kirichenko; Igor Vakhniuk; Olga-Ioanna Kalantzi; Aleksei Kholodov; Tatiana Orlova; Zhanna Markina; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Kirill Golokhvast
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-04-16

4.  Silver Nanoparticles Increase Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Concentrations in Leaves and Stimulate Root Length and Number of Roots in Tomato Seedlings in a Hormetic Manner.

Authors:  Gabriela Abigail Guzmán-Báez; Libia Iris Trejo-Téllez; Sara Monzerrat Ramírez-Olvera; Josafhat Salinas-Ruíz; Jericó J Bello-Bello; Gabriel Alcántar-González; Juan Valente Hidalgo-Contreras; Fernando C Gómez-Merino
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Nanoforms of essential metals: from hormetic phytoeffects to agricultural potential.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kolbert; Réka Szőllősi; Andrea Rónavári; Árpád Molnár
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Estimating the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) of hormetic dose-response relationships in meta-data evaluations.

Authors:  Evgenios Agathokleous; Michael N Moore; Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-11-06

7.  Application of an Ecotoxicological Battery Test to the Paddy Field Soils of the Albufera Natural Park.

Authors:  Oscar Andreu-Sánchez; Jesús Moratalla-López; José Antonio Rodríguez-Martín; Luis Roca-Pérez
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-07-05

8.  Biostimulation and toxicity: The magnitude of the impact of nanomaterials in microorganisms and plants.

Authors:  Antonio Juárez-Maldonado; Gonzalo Tortella; Olga Rubilar; Paola Fincheira; Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 10.479

9.  Hormetic Responses of Photosystem II in Tomato to Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Maria-Lavrentia Stamelou; Ilektra Sperdouli; Ioanna Pyrri; Ioannis-Dimosthenis S Adamakis; Michael Moustakas
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10

10.  Quantification and Ecological Risk Assessment of Colloidal Fullerenes Nanoparticles in Sediments by Ultrasonic-Assisted Pressurized Liquid Extraction and High Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Nokwanda Hendricks; Olatunde Stephen Olatunji; Bhekumuzi Prince Gumbi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.076

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.