Literature DB >> 31362007

Clip Closure After Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions With Substantial Risk of Bleeding.

Eduardo Albéniz1, Marco Antonio Álvarez2, Jorge C Espinós3, Oscar Nogales4, Carlos Guarner5, Pedro Alonso6, Manuel Rodríguez-Téllez7, Alberto Herreros de Tejada8, José Santiago8, Marco Bustamante-Balén9, Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez10, Felipe Ramos-Zabala11, Eduardo Valdivielso6, Felipe Martínez-Alcalá12, María Fraile13, Alfonso Elosua14, María Fernanda Guerra Veloz7, Berta Ibáñez Beroiz15, Ferrán Capdevila16, Mónica Enguita-Germán16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is not clear whether closure of mucosal defects with clips after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) prevents delayed bleeding, although it seems to have no protective effects when risk is low. We performed a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of complete clip closure of large (≥2 cm) nonpedunculated colorectal lesions after EMR in patients with an estimated average or high risk of delayed bleeding.
METHODS: We performed a single-blind trial at 11 hospitals in Spain from May 2016 through June 2018, including 235 consecutive patients who underwent EMR for large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions with an average or high risk of delayed bleeding (based on Spanish Endoscopy Society Endoscopic Resection Group score). Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received closure of the scar with 11-mm through-the-scope clips (treated, n = 119) or no clip (control, n = 116). The primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group with delayed bleeding, defined as evident hematochezia that required medical intervention within 15 days after colonoscopy.
RESULTS: In the clip group, complete closure was achieved in 68 (57%) cases, with partial closure in 33 (28%) cases and failure to close in 18 (15%) cases. Delayed bleeding occurred in 14 (12.1%) patients in the control group and in 6 (5%) patients in the clip group (absolute risk difference, reduction of 7% in the clip group; 95% confidence interval, -14.7% to 0.3%). After completion of the clip closure, there was only 1 (1.5%) case of delayed bleeding (absolute risk difference, reduction of 10.6%; 95% confidence interval, -4.3% to 17.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of patients with large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions undergoing EMR, we found that clip closure of mucosal defects in patients with a risk of bleeding can be a challenge, but also reduces delayed bleeding. Prevention of delayed bleeding required complete clip closure. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02765022.
Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; GSEED-RE; Polyp Removal; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31362007     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  23 in total

1.  Polypectomy and the Efficacy and Safety of Postpolypectomy Clipping.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-09

2.  To clip or not to clip: still no closure for all.

Authors:  Chelsea Jacobs; Peter V Draganov; Dennis Yang
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 3.  Use of the Endoscopic Clipping Over the Scope Technique to Treat Acute Severe Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Colon and Anal Transition Zone.

Authors:  Tonya Kaltenbach; Ravishankar Asokkumar; Jennifer M Kolb; Carmel Malvar; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-01

4.  Prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding by prophylactic clipping after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Yu; Eduardo Albéniz; Jing Hu; Peilin Li; Quan Li; Yaojun Hu; Jinpin Chen; Jinpeng Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Outcomes of large colorectal polyp endoscopic resections during small audience live endoscopy events with endoscopist at their home endoscopy unit.

Authors:  Ahmed El Rahyel; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-10-17

6.  Prophylactic clipping to prevent delayed colonic post-polypectomy bleeding: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

Authors:  Kirles Bishay; Zhao Wu Meng; Levi Frehlich; Matthew T James; Gilaad G Kaplan; Michael J Bourke; Robert J Hilsden; Steven J Heitman; Nauzer Forbes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Blood group O is a risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy bleeding.

Authors:  Hiroto Furuhashi; Akira Dobashi; Naoto Tamai; Nana Shimamoto; Masakuni Kobayashi; Shingo Ono; Yuko Hara; Hiroaki Matsui; Shunsuke Kamba; Hideka Horiuchi; Akio Koizumi; Tomohiko R Ohya; Masayuki Kato; Keiichi Ikeda; Hiroshi Arakawa; Kazuki Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Application of a novel self-assembling peptide to prevent hemorrhage after EMR, a feasibility and safety study.

Authors:  Elsa Soons; Ayla Turan; Erwin van Geenen; Peter Siersema
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic polypectomy devices.

Authors:  Vinay Chandrasekhara; Nikhil A Kumta; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Manoop S Bhutani; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Kumar Krishnan; John T Maple; Joshua Melson; Rahul Pannala; Mansour A Parsi; Amrita Sethi; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-04-02

10.  Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.

Authors:  Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; José-Carlos Marín-Gabriel; Alberto H de Tejada; Eduardo Albéniz; Oscar Nogales; Andres J Del Pozo-García; Pedro J Rosón; Unai Goicotxea; Hugo Uchima; Alvaro Terán; Alvarez Alberto; Rodríguez-Sánchez Joaquín; Rivero-Sánchez Liseth; Santiago José
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.