Literature DB >> 31361817

Everything You Need to Know About Satisfying IACUC Protocol Requirements.

Swapna Mohan1, Patricia L Foley2.   

Abstract

There have been recent efforts to reduce the administrative burden imposed on investigators. Although a complete and thorough review of proposed animal studies is an essential function of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), efforts to streamline and clarify this process may help investigators spend less time writing animal use protocols and responding to committee comments. The IACUC relies on well-written protocols for an efficient review process. A well-designed protocol form is also critical in guiding investigators through the process. However, it is ultimately the investigators' responsibility to ensure that the information they provide answers all the IACUC's questions with enough detail and quality for a fast and effective review. This article, aimed primarily for researchers but also IACUC administrators, provides an overview of the IACUC protocol review and approval process, the criteria that the IACUC uses for evaluations, and the type of information that should be included in the various sections of the protocol form. Some specific examples are also provided. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academy of Sciences 2019.

Keywords:  IACUC; animal use protocol; review of proposed procedures on animals

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31361817      PMCID: PMC7304469          DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilz010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  12 in total

Review 1.  A systematic approach for establishing humane endpoints.

Authors:  D B Morton
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2000

2.  Laboratory animal welfare: Public Health Service policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals by awardee institutions; notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1985-05-09

3.  Frequently asked questions about the public health service policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals.

Authors:  Axel Wolff; Nelson Garnett; Stephen Potkay; Carol Wigglesworth; Denis Doyle; Venita Thornton
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 4.  Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents.

Authors:  Eric Hutchinson; Anne Avery; Sue Vandewoude
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Establishing a culture of care, conscience, and responsibility: addressing the improvement of scientific discovery and animal welfare through science-based performance standards.

Authors:  H J Klein; K A Bayne
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2007

6.  Field studies and the IACUC: protocol review, oversight, and occupational health and safety considerations.

Authors:  Kathy Laber; Bruce W Kennedy; Larry Young
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.625

7.  Contracting in vivo research: what are the issues?

Authors:  Wendy J Underwood
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Fundamental differences between wildlife and biomedical research.

Authors:  Robert S Sikes; Ellen Paul
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

9.  Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine.

Authors:  Janine Austin Clayton
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Pain in laboratory animals: the ethical and regulatory imperatives.

Authors:  Larry Carbone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.

Authors:  Madeline L Budda; Stacy L Pritt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Bioethical, Reproducibility, and Translational Challenges of Animal Models.

Authors:  Margaret Landi; Jeffrey Everitt; B Berridge
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

3.  Animal researchers shoulder a psychological burden that animal ethics committees ought to address.

Authors:  Mike King; Hazem Zohny
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.926

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.