| Literature DB >> 31361775 |
Joelma da Silva Souza1, Gelson do Santos Difante2, João Virgínio Emerenciano Neto3, Ângela Maria Quintão Lana1, Francisca Fernanda da Silva Roberto4, Pedro Henrique Cavalcante Ribeiro5.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to examine biometric measurements during the growth phase of male and female Santa Inês sheep reared in Brachiaria brizantha pastures in northeastern Brazil. The experiment involved 24 castrated males and 24 females at an initial age of 90 days, with an average body weight of 19.04 ± 0.96 kg. Treatments consisted of the effect of four cultivars (Marandu, Xaraés, Piatã and Paiaguás) and two sexes. Six animals were used per treatment, in a randomized-block experimental design. The following characteristics were evaluated: abdominal circumference (AC), body condition score (BCS), body length (BL), body weight (BW), body capacity 1 (BC1), body capacity 2 (BC2), chest width (CW), heart girth (HG), leg circumference (LC), leg length (LL), rump height (RH), rump width (RW) and withers height (WH). Data were subjected to descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlation, ANOVA and Tukey's, Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Univariate and multiple regressions were applied to estimate BW with a maximum error level of 5%. Significant differences were observed for the biometric measurements between sexes and cultivars (p<0.05). Body weight was highly correlated (>70%) with AC, WH, CG, RW, BC1 and BC2. The male sheep grazed on cultivars Piatã showed the best values for BW (40.43 kg), HG, RW, WH, LL, LC (102.46; 20.8; 65.23; 60.44; 42.54 cm respectively) and BC1 (4.25 kg/cm). Females grazed on cultivar Marandu had higher values for RW, CW, LL (17.26; 20.1; 75.98 cm respectively), BC1 (6.03 kg/cm) and BC2 (0.422 kg/cm). The equations that best estimated live weight were BC1 and HG. In male and female Santa Inês sheep, biometric parameters grow differently depending on the cultivar where they are grazed during the growth phase. Cultivars Marandu and Piatã are the most recommended for sheep production, as they provided the best performance and body development in those animals.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31361775 PMCID: PMC6667202 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Precipitation and maximum-minimum temperatures during the experimental period.
Mean values of forage mass and percentage of structural components of Brachiaria brizantha cultivars in three grazing cycles.
| Variable | Cultivar | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marandu | Xaraés | Piatã | Paiaguás | |
| Cycle 1 | ||||
| Forage mass (kg/ha) | 2643.84 | 2603.32 | 2191.61 | 2051.43 |
| Leaf (%) | 57.42 | 72.97 | 69.01 | 64.57 |
| Stem (%) | 30.81 | 19.20 | 24.39 | 26.72 |
| Dead mass (%) | 11.77 | 8.25 | 7.54 | 8.71 |
| Cycle 2 | ||||
| Forage mass (kg/ha) | 2800.28 | 2214.87 | 2357.36 | 2698.53 |
| Leaf (%) | 60.20 | 62.12 | 66.00 | 46.08 |
| Stem (%) | 19.86 | 26.18 | 25.10 | 23.68 |
| Dead mass (%) | 19.94 | 13.37 | 10.38 | 30.38 |
| Cycle 3 | ||||
| Forage mass (kg/ha) | 2674.24 | 2450.46 | 2861.96 | 2421.32 |
| Leaf (%) | 37.49 | 31.49 | 32.00 | 21.00 |
| Stem (%) | 23.31 | 23.99 | 28.00 | 20.80 |
| Dead mass (%) | 40.0 | 44.61 | 40.85 | 58.20 |
Chemical composition of forage cultivars and concentrate.
| Feedstuff | Composition (% dry matter) | Concentrate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP | NDF | ADF | LIG | Composition (as-is basis) | ||
| Marandu grass | 8.21 | 70.83 | 34.46 | 2.84 | ||
| Xaraés grass | 8.31 | 71.23 | 43.26 | 2.94 | Livestock urea | 2.29% |
| Piatã grass | 8.10 | 71.93 | 34.63 | 2.65 | ||
| Paiaguás grass | 9.35 | 71.34 | 33.91 | 2.76 | ||
| Corn | 8.09 | 35.18 | 7.21 | 3.7 | 3.42% | |
| Soybean meal | 44.28 | 48.35 | 15.50 | 1.6 | ||
Crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and lignin (LIG).
*Composition (per kg of product): Na-147.0 g; Ca-120.0 g; P-87.0 g; S-18.0 g; Zn- 3800.0 mg; Fe-18000.0 mg; Mn-1300.0 mg; monensin sodium-1300.0 mg; F-870.0 mg; Cu-590.0 mg; Mo-300.0 mg; I-80.0 mg; Co-40.0 mg; Cr-20.0 mg; Se-15.0 mg.
Descriptive analysis of the means (()), standard errors of the mean (), and confidence intervals (CI) of biometric variables in male (M) and female (F) Santa Inês lambs at 270 days of age, in Northeast Brazil.
| Cultivar | Variable | Sex | CI | Cultivar | Variable | Sex | CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marandu | Body weight (kg) | F | 32.41a | 1.33 | 28.98–35.84 | Xaraés | Body weight (kg) | F | 27.61a | 0.98 | 25.07–30.15 |
| M | 30.90a | 3.80 | 21.12–40.67 | M | 29.93a | 2.02 | 24.73–35.12 | ||||
| Body length (cm) | F | 57.21ab | 0.56 | 55.77–58.65 | Body length (cm) | F | 54.06ab | 0.80 | 52.00–56.12 | ||
| M | 53.90ab | 1.76 | 49.37–58.42 | M | 55.88ab | 2.24 | 50.11–61.65 | ||||
| Chest width (cm) | F | 15.75a | 0.30 | 15.74–15.75 | Chest width (cm) | F | 13.36a | 0.55 | 13.94–16.79 | ||
| M | 14.75a | 1.12 | 11.86–17.63 | M | 16.16a | 0.30 | 16.16–16.17 | ||||
| Rump width (cm) | F | 17.50a | 0.56 | 16.05–18.94 | Rump width (cm) | F | 16.45a | 0.38 | 16.44–16.45 | ||
| M | 16.58a | 0.89 | 14.27–18.89 | M | 18.00a | 0.51 | 16.67–19.32 | ||||
| Heart girth (cm) | F | 92.16ab | 1.44 | 88.44–95.88 | Heart girth (cm) | F | 87.00ab | 0.96 | 84.51–89.48 | ||
| M | 87.16ab | 5.01 | 74.27–100.05 | M | 92.00ab | 1.91 | 87.07–96.92 | ||||
| Abdominal circumference (cm) | F | 98.50ab | 1.40 | 94.88–102.11 | Abdominal circumference (cm) | F | 92.50ab | 1.78 | 87.91–97.08 | ||
| M | 94.00ab | 4.44 | 82.56–105.43 | M | 95.83ab | 1.86 | 91.02–100.63 | ||||
| Piatã | Body weight (kg) | F | 32.21a | 1.26 | 28.96–35.46 | Paiaguás | Body weight (kg) | F | 27.96a | 2.21 | 21.79–34.12 |
| M | 34.16a | 1.43 | 30.48–37.85 | M | 28.93a | 1.91 | 24.01–33.85 | ||||
| Body length (cm) | F | 58.50a | 1.51 | 54.60–62.39 | Body length (cm) | F | 52.84b | 0.99 | 50.07–55.60 | ||
| M | 57.25a | 1.42 | 53.58–60.91 | M | 55.00b | 1.82 | 50.30–59.69 | ||||
| Chest width (cm) | F | 16.03a | 1.07 | 14.95–17.10 | Chest width (cm) | F | 15.00a | 0.44 | 13.75–16.24 | ||
| M | 15.91a | 0.32 | 15.91–15.92 | M | 16.50a | 0.34 | 16.49–16.50 | ||||
| Rump width (cm) | F | 17.66a | 0.55 | 16.23–19.10 | Rump width (cm) | F | 17.60a | 1.14 | 16.182–19.01 | ||
| M | 18.00a | 0.36 | 17.99–18.00 | M | 17.50a | 0.34 | 17.49–17.50 | ||||
| Heart girth (cm) | F | 93.50a | 2.59 | 86.83–100.16 | Heart girth (cm) | F | 84.00b | 3.11 | 75.34–92.65 | ||
| M | 95.16a | 1.94 | 93.12–97.3 | M | 88.83b | 1.95 | 83.80–93.86 | ||||
| Abdominal circumference (cm) | F | 97.33a | 2.10 | 91.91–102.75 | Abdominal circumference (cm) | F | 92.60b | 3.00 | 84.23–100.96 | ||
| M | 100.50a | 1.60 | 96.36–104.63 | M | 93.50b | 1.68 | 89.16–97.83 |
1There was no significant difference between the sexes.
Means followed by different letters, within cultivars, differ according to Tukey’s test (p<0.05)
Fig 2Body condition scores of Santa Inês sheep in an intermittent grazing system on different B. brizantha cultivars in Northeast Brazil.
Fig 3Linear behavior of body weight (A and B) and body length (C and D) as a function of age in Santa Inês rams and ewes on Brachiaria brizantha cultivars.
Fig 4Linear behavior of heart girth (A and B) and abdominal circumference (C and D) as a function of age in Santa Inês rams and ewes on pastures of Brachiaria brizantha cultivars.
Fig 5Linear response of chest width (A and B) and rump width (C and D) as a function of age in Santa Inês rams and ewes on pastures of Brachiaria brizantha cultivars.
Fig 6Linear behavior of withers height (A and B) and rump height (C and D) according to age in Santa Inês ewes and rams on Brachiaria brizantha cultivars.
Fig 7Linear behavior of leg length (A and B) and leg circumference (C and D) according to age in Santa Inês ewes and rams on Brachiaria brizantha cultivars.
Fig 8Body capacity indices (BC1 and BC2) according to age in Santa Inês ewes (A and B) and rams (C and D) on Brachiaria brizantha cultivars.
Regression equations to estimate the live weight of Santa Inês rams and lambs on Brachiaria brizantha cultivars according to biometric measurements.
| Cultivar | Sex | Prediction equation | Adjusted R2 (%) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marandu | Female | BW = –26.35 + 78.45 BC2 + 0.34 HG | 99.30 | 0.00001 |
| Male | BW = –24.34 + 73.34 BC2 + 0.34 HG | 99.03 | ||
| Xaraés | Female | BW = –24.70 + 75.90 BC2 + 0.33 HG | 99.47 | 0.00001 |
| Male | BW = –22.97 + 73.26 BC2 + 0.32 HG | 99.24 | ||
| Piatã | Female | BW = –27.07 + 80.22 BC2 + 0.34 HG | 99.37 | 0.00001 |
| Male | BW = –24.98 + 73.88 BC2 + 0.34 HG | 99.46 | ||
| Paiaguás | Female | BW = –26.94 + 77.81 BC2 + 0.35 HG | 99.57 | 0.00001 |
| Male | BW = –23.76 + 72.96 BC2 + 0.32 HG | 99.50 |
BW = body weight; BC2 = body capacity index 2 = live weight (kg)/heart girth (cm); HG = heart girth; P = error probability; R2 = coefficient of determination.