Literature DB >> 31361655

Efficacy and Safety of OTX-101, a Novel Nanomicellar Formulation of Cyclosporine A, for the Treatment of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: Pooled Analysis of a Phase 2b/3 and Phase 3 Study.

John Sheppard1, Shane Kannarr, Jodi Luchs, Ranjan Malhotra, Angela Justice, Abayomi Ogundele, Charles Darby, Jason Bacharach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: OTX-101 (CEQUA™) is approved in the United States for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). This pooled analysis of 2 studies (phase 2b/3 and phase 3) evaluates the efficacy and safety of OTX-101 0.09% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the subgroup of patients with a baseline Schirmer score less than 10 mm.
METHODS: In these randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled studies, patients received 1 drop of either OTX-101 or vehicle in both eyes twice daily. A Schirmer's test was performed at baseline and day 84/early discontinuation. Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) scores and adverse events were monitored at each visit.
RESULTS: The pooled analysis included 523 and 525 patients randomized to OTX-101 0.09% and vehicle, respectively. In the ITT population, 16.6% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and 9.0% of eyes receiving vehicle showed a day 84 increase in Schirmer score ≥10 mm from baseline (P<0.0001). In the subgroup with Schirmer score less than 10 mm at baseline, 18.7% and 10.2% of eyes receiving OTX-101 and vehicle, respectively, exhibited this outcome (P=0.0001). The mean (SD) percent change from baseline in global SANDE scores on day 84 in the ITT population was -29.0% (39.0%) and -30.4% (39.5%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. In the subgroup, the mean (SD) percent change was -27.3% (39.7%) and -31.4% (38.3%) for OTX-101 and vehicle groups, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: OTX-101 improved tear production compared with vehicle. Both OTX-101 and vehicle showed improved SANDE scores over baseline. OTX-101 was well tolerated in patients with KCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31361655     DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  5 in total

Review 1.  Selective Pharmacologic Therapies for Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety Data Review from Preclinical Studies and Pivotal Trials.

Authors:  Bridgitte Shen Lee; Melissa Toyos; Paul Karpecki; Jessica Schiffbauer; John Sheppard
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Vinod Burade; Rishit Zalawadia; Alpesh Patel; Abayomi Ogundele
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-21

Review 3.  A Review of Topical Cyclosporine A Formulations-A Disease-Modifying Agent for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Authors:  Gary W Jerkins; Guruprasad R Pattar; Shane R Kannarr
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-20

4.  Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Authors:  John Sheppard; Mark Bergmann; Barry A Schechter; Jodi Luchs; Abayomi Ogundele; Paul Karpecki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Combination of Nanomicellar Technology and In Situ Gelling Polymer as Ocular Drug Delivery System (ODDS) for Cyclosporine-A.

Authors:  Eleonora Terreni; Erica Zucchetti; Silvia Tampucci; Susi Burgalassi; Daniela Monti; Patrizia Chetoni
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.