Literature DB >> 31361011

Sensor Modalities for Brain-Computer Interface Technology: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Michael L Martini1, Eric Karl Oermann1, Nicholas L Opie2, Fedor Panov1, Thomas Oxley1,2, Kurt Yaeger1.   

Abstract

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is rapidly developing and changing the paradigm of neurorestoration by linking cortical activity with control of an external effector to provide patients with tangible improvements in their ability to interact with the environment. The sensor component of a BCI circuit dictates the resolution of brain pattern recognition and therefore plays an integral role in the technology. Several sensor modalities are currently in use for BCI applications and are broadly either electrode-based or functional neuroimaging-based. Sensors vary in their inherent spatial and temporal resolutions, as well as in practical aspects such as invasiveness, portability, and maintenance. Hybrid BCI systems with multimodal sensory inputs represent a promising development in the field allowing for complimentary function. Artificial intelligence and deep learning algorithms have been applied to BCI systems to achieve faster and more accurate classifications of sensory input and improve user performance in various tasks. Neurofeedback is an important advancement in the field that has been implemented in several types of BCI systems by showing users a real-time display of their recorded brain activity during a task to facilitate their control over their own cortical activity. In this way, neurofeedback has improved BCI classification and enhanced user control over BCI output. Taken together, BCI systems have progressed significantly in recent years in terms of accuracy, speed, and communication. Understanding the sensory components of a BCI is essential for neurosurgeons and clinicians as they help advance this technology in the clinical setting.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain-computer interfaces; Electrodes; Functional neuroimaging; Neurofeedback; Sensor modalities

Year:  2020        PMID: 31361011     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  8 in total

1.  Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurorecovery and Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael J Young; David J Lin; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.212

2.  Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Neuroscience: Behavioral Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Fellous; Guillermo Sapiro; Andrew Rossi; Helen Mayberg; Michele Ferrante
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Summary of over Fifty Years with Brain-Computer Interfaces-A Review.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kawala-Sterniuk; Natalia Browarska; Amir Al-Bakri; Mariusz Pelc; Jaroslaw Zygarlicki; Michaela Sidikova; Radek Martinek; Edward Jacek Gorzelanczyk
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-03

4.  Removal of Electrocardiogram Artifacts From Local Field Potentials Recorded by Sensing-Enabled Neurostimulator.

Authors:  Yue Chen; Bozhi Ma; Hongwei Hao; Luming Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Special Issues on Neurobiology: From Gene, Network to Behavior.

Authors:  Kyungjin Kim
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.034

Review 6.  Neural Plasticity in the Brain during Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Myeong Seong Bak; Haney Park; Sun Kwang Kim
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-31

Review 7.  A Comprehensive Review on Critical Issues and Possible Solutions of Motor Imagery Based Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Amardeep Singh; Ali Abdul Hussain; Sunil Lal; Hans W Guesgen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  State of the Art of Non-Invasive Electrode Materials for Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Haowen Yuan; Yao Li; Junjun Yang; Hongjie Li; Qinya Yang; Cuiping Guo; Shenmin Zhu; Xiaokang Shu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.