Literature DB >> 31360799

Safety and Efficacy of Palbociclib and Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Initial Results of a Novel Combination.

Mudit Chowdhary1, Neilayan Sen1, Akansha Chowdhary2, Lydia Usha3, Melody A Cobleigh3, Dian Wang1, Kirtesh R Patel4, Parul N Barry1, Ruta D Rao3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Palbociclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved for metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests a possible synergistic effect of palbociclib when combined with radiation therapy (RT); however, the toxicity of this pairing is unknown. We report preliminary results on the use of this combination. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of patients treated with palbociclib at our institution from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received RT for symptomatic metastases concurrently or within 14 days of palbociclib were included. Local treatment effect was assessed by clinical examination and subsequent computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Toxicity was graded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
RESULTS: A total of 16 women received palliative RT in close temporal proximity to palbociclib administration. Four patients received palbociclib before RT (25.0%), 5 concurrently (31.3%), and 7 after RT (43.8%). The median interval from closest palbociclib use to RT was 5 days (range, 0-14). The following sites were irradiated in decreasing order of frequency: bone (11 axial skeleton [9 vertebra and 2 other]; 4 pelvis; 3 extremity), brain (4: 3 whole brain RT and 1 stereotactic radiosurgery), and mediastinum (1). The median and mean follow-up time is 14.7 and 17.6 months (range, 1.7-38.2). Pain relief was achieved in all patients. No radiographic local failure was noted in the 13 patients with evaluable follow-up imaging. Leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 4 (25.0%), 5 (31.3%), and 1 (6.3%) patient before RT. After RT, 5 (31.3%), 1 (6.3%), and 3 (18.8%) patients were leukopenic, neutropenic, and thrombocytopenic, respectively. All but 2 (grade 2) hematologic toxicities were grade 1. No acute or late grade 2+ cutaneous, neurologic, or gastrointestinal toxicities were noted. Toxicity results did not differ based on disease site, palbociclib-RT temporal association, or irradiated site.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of RT in patients receiving palbociclib resulted in minimal grade 2 and no grade 3+ toxicities. This preliminary work suggests that symptomatic patients receiving palbociclib may be safely irradiated.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31360799      PMCID: PMC6639750          DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2452-1094


Introduction

Palbociclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer.1, 2, 3 The interaction of cyclin D with CDK4 and CDK6 results in the hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product, which ultimately leads to progression from G1 to the S phase of the cell cycle. Palbociclib-induced inhibition of CDK4/6 prevents cell cycle progression and thus halts uncontrolled cancer cell division. Preclinical data suggest palbociclib may augment the therapeutic effect of radiation therapy (RT) via multiple methods.5, 6, 7 Despite this potential benefit, clinicians seldom use this combination out of fear that RT may exacerbate palbociclib toxicity, particularly neutropenia and leukopenia. We report the preliminary results of patients who received RT while being treated with palbociclib for metastatic breast cancer.

Methods and Materials

With institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed records of all patients who were treated with palbociclib at Rush University Medical Center from 2015 to 2018. The starting palbociclib dose was 125 mg daily from day 1 to 21 in association with either fulvestrant 500 mg every 28 days or letrozole 2.5 mg daily. Patients who received RT for symptomatic metastasis concurrently or within 14 days of palbociclib administration (mean half-life of 26 hours) were included in our analysis. Patient charts were reviewed for the following baseline patient and treatment characteristics: age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, laboratory values, treatment site, RT technique (3-dimensional conformal RT, intensity modulated RT, whole brain radiation therapy [WBRT], fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery [fSRS], stereotactic body RT) and radiation dose/fractionation. Pain relief was assessed by the patient's self-rated pain scores (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain ever]). Local treatment effect was determined by subsequent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, if applicable. Toxicity was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 during the weekly clinic and follow-up visits in the radiation or medical oncology departments.

Results

Patient and treatment characteristics

A total of 16 women (median age, 59.6 [range, 33.3-91.0] years) received palliative RT in close temporal association with palbociclib (Table 1). The median duration of palbociclib use was 15.7 months (1.9-38.0). The median time of closest palbociclib use to RT administration was 5 days (range, 0-14): 4 patients received palbociclib before RT (25.0%), 5 (31.3%) concurrently, and 7 (43.8%) after RT.
Table 1

Baseline patient characteristics

Parametersn (range) or median (range)
Prior breast RT8 (50%)
Prior chemotherapy8 (50%)
Prior hormone therapy10 (62.5%)
Age at RT, y59.6 (33.3-91.0)
Palbociclib +
 Fulvestrant6 (37.5%)
 Letrozole10 (62.5%)
Closest palbociclib to RT interval (d)5 (0-14)
Closest palbociclib proximity to RT
 Prior4 (25.0%)
 Concurrent5 (31.3%)
 Post7 (43.8%)
RT site
 Bone: axial skeleton (vertebra)9 (39.1%)
 Bone: axial skeleton (other)2 (8.7%)
 Bone: pelvis4 (17.4%)
 Bone: extremity3 (13.0%)
 Brain4 (17.4%)
 Mediastinum1 (4.3%)

Abbreviation: RT = radiation therapy.

Baseline patient characteristics Abbreviation: RT = radiation therapy. The following sites were treated in order of frequency: bone (11 axial skeleton [9 vertebra; 2 other]; 4 pelvis; 3 extremity), brain (4: 3 WBRT and 1 fSRS), and mediastinum (1). Sixteen of 18 osseous sites received conventional RT (range, 30-37.5 Gy/10-15 fractions fxn), whereas 2 received stereotactic body RT (18 Gy/1 fxn and 30 Gy/3 fxn). For brain, WBRT ranged from 30 to 35 Gy in 10 to 14 fxn and fSRS brain dose was 25 Gy in 5 fxn. The patient treated to the mediastinum received 36 Gy in 18 fxn. Table 2 shows full RT treatment characteristics for each patient.
Table 2

RT treatment characteristics

PatientRT siteRT techniqueRT dose/fxnPain reliefLR
1C2SBRT18 Gy/1 fxnYesNo
2Left iliac crestSBRT30 Gy/3 fxnYesNo
3C2-C73D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnYesNo
4Right shoulder3D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnYesNo
Bilateral knees3D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnNo
5T12-L23D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnYesNo
Left hip3D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnNo
6T8-L13D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnYesNo
7T6-83D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnYesNo
Right calvariumIMRT37.5 Gy/15 fxnNo
8L3-sacrum3D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnYesNo
Right hip3D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnNo
Left ribs3D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnNo
9L-S spine3D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnYesNo
Right hemipelvis3D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnNo
Right proximal femur3D-CRT35 Gy/14 fxnNo
10L3-sacrum3D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnYesNo
11T10-T123D-CRT30 Gy/10 fxnYesNo
12Left frontal cavityfSRS25 Gy/5 fxn-No
13BrainWBRT30 Gy/10 fxn-No
14BrainWBRT35 Gy/14 fxn--
15BrainWBRT30 Gy/10 fxn--
16MediastinumIMRT36 Gy/18 fxnYesNo

Abbreviations: 3D-CRT = 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy; C = cervical; fSRS = fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery; Fxn = fraction; IMRT = intensity modulated radiation therapy; L = lumbar; LR = local recurrence; RT = radiation therapy; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy; T = thoracic; WBRT = whole brain radiation therapy.

RT treatment characteristics Abbreviations: 3D-CRT = 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy; C = cervical; fSRS = fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery; Fxn = fraction; IMRT = intensity modulated radiation therapy; L = lumbar; LR = local recurrence; RT = radiation therapy; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy; T = thoracic; WBRT = whole brain radiation therapy.

Treatment outcomes and toxicity

At the most recent follow-up, 12 patients are still living. The median and mean time from RT to last known follow-up or death is 14.7 and 17.6 months (range, 1.7-38.2), respectively. Median pre-RT pain was 8 (range, 6-10). Pain relief was achieved in all patients (median: 2 [range, 0-3]). No radiographic local failure was noted in the 13 patients with evaluable follow-up imaging. The combination of RT and palbociclib was well-tolerated. Grade 1 fatigue, dermatitis, and nausea were noted in 5, 3, and 1 patient, respectively. One patient who underwent WBRT developed grade 1 headache. No acute or late grade 2 or higher cutaneous, neurologic, or gastrointestinal toxicities were noted. Table 3 shows hematologic parameters before and after RT. The median time interval from blood draw and RT was 12 days (0-40) and 8 days (1-47) for pre- and postvalues, respectively. The median pre- and post-RT white blood cell (normal, 4.0-10.0 k/uL), neutrophil (normal, 1.84-7.8 K/uL), and platelet count (normal, 150-399 K/uL) was 5.12 and 4.8, 2.83 and 3.19, and 250 and 210, respectively. Leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 4 (25.0%), 5 (31.3%), and 1 (6.3%) patients before RT. After RT, 5 (31.3%; 4 new [3 grade 1 and 1 grade 2]), 1 (6.3%; grade 2), and 3 (18.8%; grade 1) patients were leukopenic, neutropenic, and thrombocytopenic, respectively.
Table 3

Hematologic parameters before and after RT in patients receiving palbociclib

PatientIrradiated Site(s)Palbo-RT relationHematologic parameters
Pre-RT
Post-RT
WBC countLeukopeniaNeutrophil countNeutropeniaPlatelet countThrombocytopeniaWBC countLeukopeniaNeutrophil countNeutropeniaPlatelet countThrombocytopenia
1AxialPost7.24No5.02No404No5.10No2.26No375No
2PelvisC5.78No3.34No247No5.23No3.25No247No
3AxialPre3.05Yes1.07Yes139Yes4.74No3.19No193No
4ExtremityPost1.72Yes0.76Yes198No1.35Yes2.46No167No
5Axial + pelvisPost2.66Yes1.07Yes181No5.14No3.78No210No
6AxialC4.13No2.64No334No4.80No3.29No313No
7AxialPre8.91No4.86No420No7.73No6.08No165No
8Axial + pelvisC4.83No3.22No262No2.20Yes1.28Yes120Yes
9Axial + pelvis + extremityPost8.74No5.09No255No4.82No3.20No226No
10AxialPre6.30No3.62No196No9.20No6.90No139Yes
11AxialPost3.26No1.09Yes181No3.32Yes1.93No216No
12BrainC5.30No3.30No175No4.46No2.14No259No
13BrainPost5.51No2.81No350No9.31No6.69No172No
14BrainPost5.58No2.84No475No3.12Yes2.04No119Yes
15BrainPre3.60Yes1.42Yes195No------
16MediastinumC4.94No2.72No253No3.88Yes2.78No211No

Abbreviations: C = concurrent with RT; Palbo = palbociclib; RT = radiation therapy; WBC = white blood cell.

WBC, neutrophil, and platelet count measured in K/uL. Normal WBC range: 4.00-10.00 K/uL. Normal neutrophil range: 1.84-7.80 K/uL. Normal platelet range: 150-399 K/uL.

Hematologic parameters before and after RT in patients receiving palbociclib Abbreviations: C = concurrent with RT; Palbo = palbociclib; RT = radiation therapy; WBC = white blood cell. WBC, neutrophil, and platelet count measured in K/uL. Normal WBC range: 4.00-10.00 K/uL. Normal neutrophil range: 1.84-7.80 K/uL. Normal platelet range: 150-399 K/uL. No patients developed infections after RT. All but 2 (grade 2) hematologic toxicities were grade 1. There was no difference in toxicities based on palbociclib-RT sequencing or by irradiated site.

Discussion

Palbociclib is the first CDK 4/6 inhibitor approved for metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer based on the promising results of the PALOMA studies. Preclinical evidence suggests that palbociclib may act synergistically with RT. Palbociclib-induced inhibition of CDK4/6 prevents cell cycle progression to the more radioresistant S phase. Moreover, palbociclib can act as a DNA double-strand break repair inhibitor, thus amplifying the anticancer effect of RT. The most frequently seen toxicity with palbociclib is hematologic, which can also occur after irradiation. Many patients with metastatic breast cancer become symptomatic and need RT; however, the lack of published clinical toxicity data results in physician reluctance to administer RT to patients receiving palbociclib. Therefore, we examined the safety and efficacy of concomitant palbociclib and RT in 16 patients with breast cancer with symptomatic metastases. With a median follow-up time of 14.7 months, we report no significant increase in acute or late toxicities, particularly hematologic, with this novel combination as compared to reports of palbociclib alone. Additionally, no differences were seen when assessing toxicity based on irradiated site (axial vs pelvis vs other) or palbociclib-RT relation (pre-, post-, and concurrent; Table 3). Sustained pain relief was achieved in all patients, and no local failures were seen in the evaluable patients. After exhaustive literature review, we found only 1 published study investigating this combination in humans. Consistent with our findings, Hans et al also report no increase in toxicity in 5 patients treated with palbociclib and RT; however, their study does not report follow-up time, local control, or toxicities grouped by irradiated site or proximity of RT and palbociclib administration. Preclinical studies of palbociclib and RT in nonbreast cancer also seem to be promising. Two studies6, 10 of palbociclib and RT in glioblastoma cell lines showed increased tumor cell apoptosis with the combination compared to monotherapy. Another study showed that palbociclib sensitized both tumor cell lines and autochthonous mouse tumors to radiation in medulloblastoma. Similar results are seen in hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Jointly, these studies suggest that palbociclib may be a promising drug to increase the therapeutic ratio of RT.

Conclusions

The use of RT in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving palbociclib resulted in minimal grade 1 to 2 and no grade 3+ toxicities. This preliminary work suggests that RT in this patient population is safe and feasible. Subsequent studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results and investigate further use of palbociclib with RT.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cyclin D as a therapeutic target in cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; C Elizabeth Caldon; Jane Barraclough; Andrew Stone; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Preliminary results of the association of Palbociclib and radiotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sophie Hans; Paul Cottu; Youlia M Kirova
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Coadministration of Trametinib and Palbociclib Radiosensitizes KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Zhen Tao; Justin M Le Blanc; Chenguang Wang; Tingting Zhan; Hongqing Zhuang; Ping Wang; Zhiyong Yuan; Bo Lu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study.

Authors:  Richard S Finn; John P Crown; Istvan Lang; Katalin Boer; Igor M Bondarenko; Sergey O Kulyk; Johannes Ettl; Ravindranath Patel; Tamas Pinter; Marcus Schmidt; Yaroslav Shparyk; Anu R Thummala; Nataliya L Voytko; Camilla Fowst; Xin Huang; Sindy T Kim; Sophia Randolph; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Phase I, dose-escalation trial of the oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor PD 0332991, administered using a 21-day schedule in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty; Patricia M Lorusso; Angela Demichele; Vandana G Abramson; Rachel Courtney; Sophia S Randolph; M Naveed Shaik; Keith D Wilner; Peter J O'Dwyer; Gary K Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Massimo Cristofanilli; Nicholas C Turner; Igor Bondarenko; Jungsil Ro; Seock-Ah Im; Norikazu Masuda; Marco Colleoni; Angela DeMichele; Sherene Loi; Sunil Verma; Hiroji Iwata; Nadia Harbeck; Ke Zhang; Kathy Puyana Theall; Yuqiu Jiang; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Maria Koehler; Dennis Slamon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Inhibition of DNA damage repair by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib delays irradiated intracranial atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor and glioblastoma xenograft regrowth.

Authors:  Rintaro Hashizume; Ali Zhang; Sabine Mueller; Michael D Prados; Rishi R Lulla; Stewart Goldman; Amanda M Saratsis; Andrew P Mazar; Alexander H Stegh; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Craig Horbinski; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Jann N Sarkaria; Todd Waldman; C David James
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Richard S Finn; Miguel Martin; Hope S Rugo; Stephen Jones; Seock-Ah Im; Karen Gelmon; Nadia Harbeck; Oleg N Lipatov; Janice M Walshe; Stacy Moulder; Eric Gauthier; Dongrui R Lu; Sophia Randolph; Véronique Diéras; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 suppresses cell proliferation and enhances radiation sensitivity in medulloblastoma cells.

Authors:  Susan L Whiteway; Peter S Harris; Sujatha Venkataraman; Irina Alimova; Diane K Birks; Andrew M Donson; Nicholas K Foreman; Rajeev Vibhakar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Combination of palbociclib and radiotherapy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Shane Whittaker; Daniel Madani; Swapna Joshi; Sylvia A Chung; Terrance Johns; Bryan Day; Mustafa Khasraw; Kerrie L McDonald
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2017-07-03
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer.

Authors:  Giulia Petroni; Lewis C Cantley; Laura Santambrogio; Silvia C Formenti; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Incidence and Severity of Myelosuppression With Palbociclib After Palliative Bone Radiation in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single Center Experience and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Haval Norman; Kimberley T Lee; Vered Stearns; Sara R Alcorn; Neha S Mangini
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Safety and Tolerability of Metastasis-Directed Radiation Therapy in the Era of Evolving Systemic, Immune, and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Guimond; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Ali Hosni; Grainne O'Kane; Jonathan Yang; Aisling Barry
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14

4.  CDK4/6 inhibition suppresses tumour growth and enhances the effect of temozolomide in glioma cells.

Authors:  Yingxiao Cao; Xin Li; Shiqi Kong; Shuling Shang; Yanhui Qi
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.310

5.  Real-World Clinical Data of Palbociclib in Asian Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Experiences from Eight Institutions.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Hyung Soon Park; Hye Sung Won; Ji Hyun Yang; Hee Yeon Lee; In Sook Woo; Kabsoo Shin; Ji Hyung Hong; Young Joon Yang; Sang Hoon Chun; Jae Ho Byun
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  Short-term CDK4/6 Inhibition Radiosensitizes Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Andrea M Pesch; Nicole H Hirsh; Benjamin C Chandler; Anna R Michmerhuizen; Cassandra L Ritter; Marlie P Androsiglio; Kari Wilder-Romans; Meilan Liu; Christina L Gersch; José M Larios; Lori J Pierce; James M Rae; Corey W Speers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Role of the Combination of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors (CDKI) and Radiotherapy (RT) in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Advantages and Risks in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ambrogio Gagliano; Angela Prestifilippo; Ornella Cantale; Gianluca Ferini; Giacomo Fisichella; Paolo Fontana; Dorotea Sciacca; Dario Giuffrida
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  A single-center retrospective safety analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors concurrent with radiation therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrea Emanuele Guerini; Sara Pedretti; Emiliano Salah; Edda Lucia Simoncini; Marta Maddalo; Ludovica Pegurri; Rebecca Pedersini; Lucia Vassalli; Nadia Pasinetti; Gloria Peretto; Luca Triggiani; Gianluca Costantino; Vanessa Figlia; Filippo Alongi; Stefano Maria Magrini; Michela Buglione
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  CDK4/6 inhibitors: a novel strategy for tumor radiosensitization.

Authors:  Yilan Yang; Jurui Luo; Xingxing Chen; Zhaozhi Yang; Xin Mei; Jinli Ma; Zhen Zhang; Xiaomao Guo; Xiaoli Yu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-15

10.  [Ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy improves overall survival of pre-/perimenopausal breast cancer patients].

Authors:  David Krug; Alexander Fabian; Jürgen Dunst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.