| Literature DB >> 31360666 |
M Cataldi1, V De Luca2, G Tramontano2, C Del Giudice2, I Grimaldi2, P Cuccaro2, P Speranza3, G Iadicicco2, V Iadicicco2, F Carotenuto2, P A Riccio4, G Di Spigna5, A Renzullo6, L Vuolo6, L Barrea6, S Savastano6, A Colao6, G Liotta7, G Iaccarino8, P Abete5, P Buono9, M Vollenbroek-Hutten10, M Illario2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11.
Abstract
We developed and tested an innovative physical training method in older adults that embeds the gym program into everyday life in the most conservative way possible. Physical training was included in the activities of local parishes where older women from Southern Italy spend most of their free time and was delivered by trained physical therapists with the support of an ICT tool known as CoCo. 113 older women (aged 72.0 [69.0-75.0] years) noncompliant to conventional exercise programs participated to the study. 57 of them underwent the final anthropometric assessment and 50 the final physical tests. In study completers handgrip strength and physical performance evaluated with the chair-stand, the two minutes step and the chair-sit and -reach tests significantly improved. Quality of life as evaluated with the EuroQol-5dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire improved as well. In conclusion, a training program designed to minimally impact on life habits of older people is effective in improving fitness in patients noncompliant to other to physical exercise programs.Entities:
Keywords: ICT; community; parish; physical function; physical performance; physical training
Year: 2019 PMID: 31360666 PMCID: PMC6581496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Med UniSa ISSN: 2239-9747
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POPULATION STUDY
| n | AVERAGE | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 113 | 72.0 [68.0–75.0] |
| Body weight | 113 | 69.0 [62.8–76.4] |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 113 | 28.8±4.1 |
| WaistCircumference (cm) | 113 | 92.8±12.1 |
| Hip Circumference (cm) | 113 | 103.0 [100.0–109.6] |
| Waist to Hip ratio | 113 | 0.88±0.08 |
| Handgrip strength (Kg) | 78 | 20.3 [16.4–23.0] |
| EQ-D5 (total score) | 113 | 0.73 [0.69–0.85] |
| Chair Stand Test (number of stands) | 113 | 13.0 [10.0–16.0] |
| Chair sit and reach Test (cm) | 113 | 6.0 [3.0–8.0] |
| Two minutes step test (number of cycles) | 113 | 62.5 [40.0–110.0] |
Reference values for people in the age range of the study population are as follows: EQ-5D, 0.823 and 0.724 in people aged 65–74 and 75+ years, respectively [34]; Chair Stand Test, < 10 in females aged 65–69 and< 11 if aged 70–74 [58]; Chair sit and reach Test (cm): −1.27–11.43 in females aged 65–69 and −2.54–10.16 if aged 70–74 [37]; Two minutes step test (number of cycles): 75–107 in females aged 65–79 and 68–100 if aged 65–79 [37].
ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS AND SCORES AT THE PHYSICAL TESTS AND QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRES IN STUDY PARTICIPANTS WHO UNDERWENT THE FINAL VISIT
| n | BEFORE THE INTERVENTION | AFTER THE INTERVENTION | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body Weight (Kg) | 57 | 70.0 [61.8–75.9] | 69.0 [62.8–76.4] |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 57 | 28.2±3.7 | 28.8±4.1 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 57 | 98.5±10.6 | 92.8±12.1 |
| Hip Circumference (cm) | 57 | 106.0 [100.8–111.5] | 103.0 [100.0–109.6] |
| Waist to Hip ratio | 57 | 0.90 [0.88–0.98] | 0.88 [0.82–0.93] |
| Handgrip strength (Kg) | 47 | 21.1 [16.4–23.5] | 24.3 [21.0–28.0] |
| EQ-D5 (total score) | 62 | 0.727 [0.689–0.848] | 0.796 [0.725–0.849] |
| Chair Stand Test (number of stands) | 50 | 12.0 [9.0–15.0] | 15.0 [12.0–22.0] |
| Chair sit and reach Test (cm between extended fingers and tip of toe) | 50 | 7.0 [4.0–8.0] | 0.0 [0.0–5.0] |
| Two minutes step test (number of full stepping cycles) | 50 | 55.0 [37.0–100.0] | 102.5 [70.0–136.0] |
p<0.05, paired t-test