Literature DB >> 31360338

Sonoelastography for Skin Evaluation in Sclerodermic Patients.

Arvin Aryan1, Hurieh Alaeen2, Mehrdad Dadgostar3, Abdorrahman Rostamian4, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study is to evaluate elastography ultrasound findings in patients with scleroderma (SS) and to clarify the effectiveness of elastosonography to differentiate scleroderma lesions from any skin lesion considering tissue elasticity.
METHODS: Thirty-six SS patients definite diagnosis of systemic sclerosis according to American College of Rheumatology criteria and 36 healthy subjects were enrolled. Volar aspect of the middle forearm and arm in addition to the dorsal aspect of the fingers were evaluated by sonoelastography. The RGB (red, green, blue) image is a three-dimensional matrix. A color image RGB is an M × N × 3 array of color pixels. The total pixels, total blue pixels, and blue index compared between SS cases and controls.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 41.3 ± 10.3 years and mean age of controls was 39.8 ± 9.3 years. Mean-modified Rodnan skin score of the whole body was 11.9 and mean duration of disease was 6.2 years. Mean total blue pixels in the arm were significantly different between cases and controls. Mean total image pixels, total blue pixels, and blue index in the forearm were significantly different between cases and controls. Elastography findings in the finger were not significantly different between cases and controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Sonoelastography could be used for evaluating skin of forearm in sclerodermic cases which will be helpful for disease evaluation in clinical course.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elasticity imaging techniques; scleroderma; skin

Year:  2019        PMID: 31360338      PMCID: PMC6592100          DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_43_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prev Med        ISSN: 2008-7802


Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease. It is characterized by inflammation, progressive thickening, and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs.[12] The clinical course of the disease has wide range: from limited form which involves only skin and peripheral vessels to diffuse form which leads to skin and internal organ fibrosis.[2] Conventional ultrasound techniques are useful to assess the skin thickness and its echogenicity[3] but evaluation of skin elasticity is not possible by conventional probes. So, ultrasound elastography which is based on the degree of tissue displacement in response to compression and decompression of the external forces could be applied to assess skin elasticity.[4] Sonoelastography is a new sonographic technique that has been applied to assess qualitative assessment of the target tissue.[5] Soft tissues move more than stiff tissues in response to compression and de-compression. So, they show different colors. This technique has been applied for different tissues such as breast, thyroid, pancreas, and liver.[4] Little studies exist on its application for skin. We designed this study to clarify the effectiveness of elastosonography to differentiate scleroderma lesions from any skin lesion considering tissue elasticity.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Imam Hospital (affiliated hospital of Tehran University) between August 2012 and August 2014. Thirty-six patients with definite diagnosis of SSc according to American College of Rheumatology criteria[6] and 36 healthy controls (age and sex matched cases) enrolled. Exclusion criterion was suspicious overlap syndrome. All participants asked to fill informed consent forms before study entrance. The study had been approved by TUMS (Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ethical committee. Patients were examined by an expert rheumatologist and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) was recorded. Presence of digital ulcers, telangiectasia, Raynaud's phenomenon, dysphagia, cough, and respiratory distress were recorded, too. An expert radiologist in the field of elastoscans (with 6 years of experience) performed all US evaluations (both gray scale and elastoscan) by means of a 12-MHz (MYLAB 70 XVG, Esaote Co., Genoa, Italy) linear array transducer. The performance was blinded to clinical data. Volar aspect of the middle forearm and arm in addition to the dorsal aspect of the fingers were evaluated. To obtain images, the probe was placed on the target site and light compression (1–2 circles of the spiral indicator) was applied to prevent pressure artifacts. Both gray scale and elatographic images acquired during probe movement and gray scale images were shown on the left-hand side of the screen while elastograms were on the right side. The colors ranged from red to blue; blue indicated harder tissues while red indicated softer tissues.

Red, green, and blue color model

The RGB color model is the simplest model to display color images. The model consists of primary spectral component of red, green, and blue that is the result of mixing a wide range of colors. The RGB model can be displayed using Cartesian coordinates in a cubic space [Figure 1] in which the three primary colors of red, green, and blue are positioned at the three angles. The black is located at the center of coordinates with the white being located in the farthest angle of the cube. The secondary colors of yellow, cyan, and magenta are located in the other three angles.[7] In this color system, the intensity of different colors can be displayed on a scale of 0–255. Thus, for example, the pure red can be displayed as (255, 0, 0) in which the color intensity of green and red channels are zero. Likewise, the color green and pure red can be depicted as (0, 255, 0) and (0, 0, 255), respectively.[78]
Figure 1

RGB color model

RGB color model In RGB color model, a specific color could be made by different combinations of each color component. Thus, in some specific application where the purpose is to choose a specific range of color spectrum, it will be difficult to use the image processing.[8]

YCbCr color model

With the advancement of image processing techniques, YCbCr model has been widely used in image processing and digital video images. In this model, the luminance data are saved by component Y and color data in color-difference components by components Cr and Cb, which are known as chroma components. The Cb component indicates the difference between the blue component and a reference value, whereas Cr component reveals the difference between the red component and a reference value. To obtain YCbCr value components, the values of RGB model in the range of 0–255 are used. Therefore, the values of YCbCr component can be achieved from equation (1).[8910] Y = 0.299 R + 0.587 G + 0.114 B Cr = R - Y Cb = B - Y

Segmentation

In Figure 2, an ultrasound image of skin layers including gray image (left) and color image (right) are shown. In the right image, the areas of interest (region of interest [ROI]) are determined manually by a skilled radiologist using black lines. The color image on the right has been used for segmentation. The image size is 480 × 630 × 3 pixels. The color and its intensity in the image are symptomatic of the tissue stiffness in that skin area. The soft and hard tissues are shown by red and blue, respectively.
Figure 2

Selected regions by radiologist in the forearm of a patient

Selected regions by radiologist in the forearm of a patient As discussed earlier, the color point in RGB image is a combination of three components of red, green, and blue. Therefore, a point depicted by color blue in the visual range of the human eye can be composed of different combinations of three components. Thus, in the RGB space, it is difficult to select color spectrum with blue points. On the other hand, the components of YCbCr color space are more dependent than the RGB components.[2] In the proposed method, therefore, to identify the areas in blue, the Cb component in YCbCr color model is used. As discussed in YCbCr model, component Cb carried the data of color blue. Therefore, for the segmentation of blue region, first the region marked by a black line is selected. Then, in the ROI, the entire points in which the value of the Cb component is greater than 149 are selected. Why is this cutoff score? Figure 3 has shown the result of selecting blue regions in the ROI. It should be noted that the threshold number 149 was calculated experimentally based on the images available. For the components Y and Cr, no threshold or limit was considered. Finally, the area of selected blue regions is calculated to be used as a feature for differentiating healthy individuals from patients.
Figure 3

(a) The region of interest selected by the radiologist and (b) Cb component in YCbCr color model

(a) The region of interest selected by the radiologist and (b) Cb component in YCbCr color model All data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SD for continuous or frequencies for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared by means of independent sample t-test. P value less than 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Thirty-six SS patients and 36 healthy subjects were enrolled [Table 1].
Table 1

Clinical findings in patients

Frequency (%)
Digital ulcers15 (41.7)
Telangiectasia19 (52.8)
Raynaud’s phenomenon34 (94.4)
Dysphagia24 (66.7)
Cough13 (36.1)
Respiratory distress16 (44.4)
Clinical findings in patients Six participants in each group were male. Mean age of patients was 41.3 ± 10.3 years and mean age of controls was 39.8 ± 9.3 years (P = 0.05). The type of the disease was limited in 16 (44.4%) and diffuse in 55.5%. Mean mRSS of the whole body was 11.9 (minimum 6 and maximum 22) and mean duration of disease was 6.2 years. Mean total blue pixels in the arm were significantly different between cases and controls [Table 2].
Table 2

Sonoelastography findings in the arm in cases and controls

ControlsCasesP
Total image pixels7015.8±54908366.5±2210.50.05
Total blue pixels5238.5±18396456.5±1830<0.001
Blue index0.78±0.150.78±0.160.8
Sonoelastography findings in the arm in cases and controls Mean total image pixels, total blue pixels, and blue index in the forearm were significantly different between cases and controls [Table 3].
Table 3

Sonoelastography findings in the forearm in cases and controls

CasesControlsP
Total image pixels6198.3±25368279±1850<0.001
Total blue pixels5537.3±24946727±1420<0.001
Blue index0.87±0.0830.82±0.12<0.001
Sonoelastography findings in the forearm in cases and controls Elastography findings in the finger were not significantly different between cases and controls [Table 4].
Table 4

Sonoelastography findings in the fingers in cases and controls

CasesControlsP
Total image pixels4644.9±5053.74372.4±40120.7
Total blue pixels3042.9±24682579±13310.1
Blue index0.8
Sonoelastography findings in the fingers in cases and controls

Discussion

The result of current study showed that total blue pixels were significantly higher in arm and forearm of cases than controls and blue index was significantly higher in forearm of cases than controls. This could be indicative of reduced skin elasticity in sclerodermic cases than healthy controls. In a previous study, Iagnocco et al. evaluated 18 women with SS and 15 controls. They applied sonoelastography for forearm and found homogeneous blue area in forearm of all patients which was related to dermis. In contrast, in controls, they detected only green pattern with sporadic areas of light blue.[1] As our results show, total blue pixels and blue index were significantly higher in cases than controls which is in agreement with their findings. Like our results which show no significant differences between total blue pixels and blue index of cases and controls, Iagnocco et al. reported variable and changeable colored areas on dorsal aspect of the fingers in both groups.[1] Geso et al. evaluated 22 patients with SS. They applied sonoelastography on the dorsal aspect of their second finger in the dominant hand and investigated high correlation between B mode sonography findings and elastography as well as high intra-class correlation coefficient.[11] It should be considered that finger sonoelastography has some limitations, for instance presence of bone structures in the field of elastography. So, proper evaluation of dermis in this field will be confusing due to bone interference.[1] This may present elastography as not suitable method for elasticity evaluation of finger dermis as there is no much soft tissue in fingers than arms or forearms. SS is characterized by reduced elasticity of the skin as the result of changes in collagen deposition and connective tissues.[1] Skin involvement in SS is disabling and predictor of visceral involvement and mortality.[121314] Although mRSS is used for skin involvement in SS, it has some limitations such as operator dependence and changing over time.[11] So, modalities such as ultrasound and durometry (using digital hand-held, spring-loaded devices) could provide objective measurements.[151617] This study had some limitations.First, it conducted in a tertiary center. Second, the number of patients was limited. Further, larger multi-centric studies are recommended. Also, further studies could apply shearwave elastography which is more convenient and user friendly for evaluation.

Conclusions

Sonoelastography could be used for evaluating skin of forearm in sclerodermic cases which will be helpful for disease evaluation in clinical course.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  13 in total

1.  Reliability of ultrasound measurements of dermal thickness at digits in systemic sclerosis: role of elastosonography.

Authors:  Luca Di Geso; Emilio Filippucci; Rita Girolimetti; Marika Tardella; Marwin Gutierrez; Rossella De Angelis; Fausto Salaffi; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Ultrasound elastography assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: lights and shadows.

Authors:  Annamaria Iagnocco; Olga Kaloudi; Chiara Perella; Francesca Bandinelli; Valeria Riccieri; Massimiliano Vasile; Francesco Porta; Guido Valesini; Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  A world of progress in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  P J Clements; M Matucci-Cerinic; S Bombardieri; J R Seibold
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.473

4.  Durometry for the assessment of skin disease in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Eugene Y Kissin; Aileen M Schiller; Rondi B Gelbard; Jennifer J Anderson; Vincent Falanga; Robert W Simms; Joseph H Korn; Peter A Merkel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

5.  Skin thickness progression rate: a predictor of mortality and early internal organ involvement in diffuse scleroderma.

Authors:  Robyn T Domsic; Tatiana Rodriguez-Reyna; Mary Lucas; Noreen Fertig; Thomas A Medsger
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Skin thickness score as a predictor and correlate of outcome in systemic sclerosis: high-dose versus low-dose penicillamine trial.

Authors:  P J Clements; E L Hurwitz; W K Wong; J R Seibold; M Mayes; B White; F Wigley; M Weisman; W Barr; L Moreland; T A Medsger; V D Steen; R W Martin; D Collier; A Weinstein; E Lally; J Varga; S R Weiner; B Andrews; M Abeles; D E Furst
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-11

7.  Improvement in skin thickening in systemic sclerosis associated with improved survival.

Authors:  V D Steen; T A Medsger
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-12

8.  Longitudinal development of skin involvement and reliability of high frequency ultrasound in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  A Akesson; R Hesselstrand; A Scheja; M Wildt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  High frequency ultrasound measurement of digital dermal thickness in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Olga Kaloudi; Francesca Bandinelli; Emilio Filippucci; Maria Letizia Conforti; Irene Miniati; Serena Guiducci; Francesco Porta; Antonio Candelieri; Domenico Conforti; Genesio Grassiri; Walter Grassi; Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  High-frequency ultrasound of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis reflects oedema, extension and severity in early disease.

Authors:  R Hesselstrand; A Scheja; M Wildt; A Akesson
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  5 in total

1.  High-resolution ultrasound imaging of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Dźwigała; Piotr Sobolewski; Maria Maślińska; Ida Yurtsever; Elżbieta Szymańska; Irena Walecka
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  The role of ultrasound in systemic sclerosis: On the cutting edge to foster clinical and research advancement.

Authors:  Michael Hughes; Cosimo Bruni; Giovanna Cuomo; Andrea Delle Sedie; Luna Gargani; Marwin Gutierrez; Gemma Lepri; Barbara Ruaro; Tania Santiago; Yossra Suliman; Shinji Watanabe; Annamaria Iagnocco; Daniel Furst; Silvia Bellando-Randone
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2020-11-19

3.  Ultrasonography, MRI and classic radiography of skin and MSK involvement in juvenile scleroderma.

Authors:  Marta Idzior; Maria Sotniczuk; Emil Michalski; Piotr Gietka; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  How to perform high ultrasound examination of skin involvement among patients with systemic sclerosis - proposition of a unified protocol.

Authors:  Piotr Sobolewski; Monika Elżbieta Dźwigała; Maria Maślińska; Elżbieta Szymańska; Irena Walecka
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2021-02-28

5.  Elastography as a possible useful method of assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Piotr Sobolewski; Monika Dźwigała; Jakub Zakrzewski; Łukasz Paluch; Jacek Bogucki; Elżbieta Szymañska; Irena Walecka
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.664

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.