Literature DB >> 31360029

Brain Edema in Chronic Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Cristina Cudalbu1, Simon D Taylor-Robinson2.   

Abstract

Brain edema is a common feature associated with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). In patients with acute HE, brain edema has been shown to play a crucial role in the associated neurological deterioration. In chronic HE, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have demonstrated that low-grade brain edema appears also to be an important pathological feature. This review explores the different methods used to measure brain edema ex vivo and in vivo in animal models and in humans with chronic HE. In addition, an in-depth description of the main studies performed to date is provided. The role of brain edema in the neurological alterations linked to HE and whether HE and brain edema are the manifestations of the same pathophysiological mechanism or two different cerebral manifestations of brain dysfunction in liver disease are still under debate. In vivo MRI/magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies have allowed insight into the development of brain edema in chronic HE. However, additional in vivo longitudinal and multiparametric/multimodal studies are required (in humans and animal models) to elucidate the relationship between liver function, brain metabolic changes, cellular changes, cell swelling, and neurological manifestations in chronic HE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1H MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; ALF, acute liver failure; AQP, aquaporins; BBB, blood-brain barrier; BDL, bile duct ligation; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Cr, creatine; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; GM, gray matter; Gln, glutamine; Glx, sum of glutamine and glutamate; HE, hepatic encephalopathy; Ins, inositol; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; Lac, lactate; MD, mean diffusivity; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; MT, magnetization transfer; MTR, MT ratio; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; PCA, portocaval anastomosis; TE, echo time; WM, white matter; brain edema; chronic hepatic encephalopathy; in vivo magnetic resonance imaging; in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy; liver cirrhosis; mIns, myo-inositol; tCho, total choline; tCr, total creatine

Year:  2019        PMID: 31360029      PMCID: PMC6637228          DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol        ISSN: 0973-6883


Brain edema is defined as an excessive accumulation of fluid (chiefly water) in the intracellular or extracellular spaces of the brain, which occurs on the background of an osmotic gradient. The pathological process is a complex phenomenon to measure and characterize, because it can be the result or effect of a certain disease or cerebral injury, but can also cause pathology or aggravate an existing disease process. The measurement of brain edema can be used to aid diagnosis and/or to measure targeted treatment effects. It is now well accepted that brain edema is a common feature associated with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Net fluid entry to the brain from the vascular compartment (vasogenic edema) increases the brain volume, raises intracranial pressure, and potentially leads to fatal brainstem compression in the most severe, acute form. Vasogenic edema mainly occurs because of a breakdown of the tight endothelial junctions that make up the blood-brain barrier (BBB), while a disruption in cellular metabolism impairs functioning of the sodium and potassium pump in the glial cell membrane and causes accumulation of osmotically active molecules, leading to cellular retention of sodium and water and consequently to cytotoxic edema.2, 3, 4 Although cytotoxic edema refers to intracellular swelling (an isolated fluid shift from the interstitial to the intracellular, cytosolic compartment with no net fluid entry to the brain), it can also occur following an increase in permeability (not physical breakdown) of the BBB. It is not unreasonable to assume that this pathological process is accompanied by some degree of net brain edema.1, 2 This astrocytic swelling, accompanied by a shift of fluid from the interstitial/intravascular compartment to the intracellular (astrocytic) compartment, can lead to detrimental effects. The molecular mechanisms leading to astrocyte swelling are not yet fully understood and are believed to be linked with osmo-sensitive or stretch-sensitive intracellular signaling cascades, involving [Ca2+]i transients, aquaporins (AQPs) and volume-regulated anion channels.5, 6, 7 Astrocytes have a strategic perivascular location and high water permeability, and therefore their membrane is believed to be the main source of water entry in the brain. Moreover, water transport is the primary function of the main AQPs (plasma membrane water-transporting proteins) in the central nervous system (CNS). AQP-4 is expressed in astrocytic feet, lining the microcapillary endothelial cells of the BBB, and it is involved in water movement, cell volume regulation, cell migration, and neuroexcitation.6, 8 Accordingly, increased expression of AQP-4 has been shown to correlate with the development of brain edema in several diseases.1, 6 Pathologically speaking, HE is characterized by astrocyte swelling, leading to brain edema. In acute HE (encephalopathy associated with acute liver failure [ALF]), brain edema occurs in the majority of patients to some degree and contributes to increased intracranial pressure, which can lead to brainstem herniation in the most severe cases.10, 11, 12, 13 In chronic HE (encephalopathy associated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension/or portal-systemic shunts), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have demonstrated that low-grade brain edema appears also to be an important pathological feature, even though intracranial hypertension is rarely observed2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 (for more details please see Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). Edema in acute HE is believed to be mainly cytotoxic,10, 11 whereas in chronic HE, low-grade edema is also associated with Alzheimer type II changes as a morphological counterpart of astrocyte swelling. It is important to emphasize that labeling a particular case of edema as “vasogenic” or “cytotoxic” cannot be rigidly applied, since it is unusual for only one of the two mechanisms to exist in isolation. Overall, one type of edema will gradually lead to the development of the other type. This is also the case in HE where the two types of edema might coexist.2, 22 Nevertheless, knowledge of the relative contribution of these two mechanisms in the various phases of edema development might be useful in understanding the dynamics of brain edema and theoretically, in designing useful means of clinical management.
Table 1

Summary of the Main Results Published to Date Using Different Ex Vivo Techniques in Chronic HE Animal Models.

Animal modelSubjects (n)MethodBrain regionType of measurementFindings
CommentsRef
EdemaType of edema Cell typeOther
BDL ratsSham rats898-10Gravimetry, 3 weeks post-BDLGFAP stainingHPLC – osmolytesBehavior studiesCC, 2mm2FC, PCEx-vivo, end pointEx-vivo, end pointEx-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentIndirect indicationN/ADirect evidence, astrocytesNo change in water content = 79.73±0.12%No changes in GFAP staining in BDL ratsMinor and non-significant changes in brain Gln and InsNo change in plasma and brain ammonia (122±70 μmol/L in plasma and 0.29±0.18μmol/g in brain of BDL)Mild impairment of motor coordination and a spontaneous motor activity in BDL ratsLPS: ↑brain water content and Alzheimer type II astrocytes133
BDL ratsSham rats76Gravimetry, 4 weeks post-BDLEx-vivo1H MRS, no information on quantificationElectron microscopyAssessment of level of consciousnessFC, CC – 2mm2Ex-vivo, end pointEx-vivo, end pointEx-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentN/ADirect evidence- cytotoxic edema, astrocytesNo change in water content = 79.9±0.27%↓ Gln, NAAPartially collapsed microvesselIntact BBB↑ plasma (168±14μmol/L) and brain (1.0±0.36μmol/g) ammoniaNo neurological modifications in BDL ratsAmong the very few reports showing a↓GlnMinimal water accumulation in astrocytic, perivascular tissueLPS injection ↑brain water content and lead to a deterioration of tin the conscious level26
BDL ratsSham rats66Gravimetry, 6 weeks post-BDLLocomotor activityFC, 2mm3Ex-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentN/A↑water content = 79.46±0.28% (BDL) vs 78.35±0.17% (sham)Allopurinol treatment decreased arterial ROS and brain edema but did not improve liver function nor fully restored locomotor activity-edema is not the only cause of HE↑ arterial (119.7±15.2μM) and CSF (128.4±36.7μM) ammoniaHA does not induce OS independently nor brain edemaIn combination systemic OS and HA stimulate an ↑water contentSystemic OS is a result of primary liver injury24
BDL ratsSham rats76Gravimetry, 6 weeks post-BDLFC, 1mm3Ex-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentN/A-no significant change in water content between BDL and sham ratsExact water content difficult to assess from the graph = 81.5-82.5% (BDL)LPS injection ↑brain water content25
BDL ratsSham ratsNo indication on number of rats was foundGravimetry, 6 weeks post-BDLEx vivo1H MRS, no information on quantificationEx vivo fluorescenceFCEx-vivo, end pointEx-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentN/A↑water content↑Gln, Glu, Tau↓Inssum of osmolytes↑brain Lac, ↑CSF ammoniaAST-120 and DCA treatments ↓ brain edema, Lac but not brain GlnOnly AST-120 ↓ CSF ammoniaExact water content was difficult to assess from the graph = 78-79% (BDL)Correlations: No correlation between CSF ammonia and brain GlnCorrelation between CSF ammonia and brain Lac↑brain Lac and not Gln is a key factor in pathogenesis of brain edema together with impaired compensatory osmoregulatory mechanisms95
BDL ratsSham rats6 groups (6/group)3 groups (6/group)Dry weight technique, 4 weeks post-BDLAssessment of level of consciousness50 mm2wet FCEx-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentN/ANo change in water content in BDL rats↑water content in shams +HD and shams+LPS↑water content in BDL+HD and BDL+HD+LPS↓ water content after administration of OP and OP + infliximab↑arterial and brain ammonia in HD and BDL rats; and ↓ after OP (±infliximab)↓arterial ammonia with OP may prevent LPS induced worsening of HE and brain edema.Exact values of water content and ammonia were difficult to assess from the graphs134
BDL ratsSham rats9 groups (6-8/group)2 groups (7/group)Dry weight technique, 4 weeks post-BDLEx vivo1H MRS, no information on quantification50 mm2wet FC (GM)Ex-vivo, end pointDirect, absolute assessment of water contentN/A↑plasma ammonia in BDL rats (67±6 to 186±20 μmol/L)↑water content in BDL ratsNo change in brain Gln in BDL rats↓ brain mIns in BDL ratsOP treatment: ↓brain water content and plasma ammonia, no change in brain Gln or mIns,Exact values of water content were difficult to assess from the graphs (∼76% in Shams and ∼78% in BDL)135

Abbreviations: Frontal cortex (FC), Cerebral cortex (CC), parietal cortex (PC), gray matter (GM), oxidative stress (OS), reactive oxygen species (ROS), blood brain barrier (BBB), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lactate (Lac), glutamine (Gln), taurine (Tau), inositol (Ins), myo-inositol (mIns), glutamate (Glu), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), hyperammonemia (HA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), bile duct ligation (BDL), ornithine phenylacetate (OP), oral ammonia absorbent engineered activated carbon microspheres (AST-120), dichloroacetate (DCA), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS), high protein/ammoniagenic diet (HD). Authors personal comments are in italics in the comments row.

Table 2

Summary of the Main Results Published to Date Now Using Different In Vivo MRI/MRS Techniques in Chronic HE Animal Models.

Animal modelSubjects (n)Magnetic Field (B0)MethodBrain regionType of measurementFindings
CommentsRef
EdemaType of edema Cell typeOther
BDL ratsSham rats867T1H MRS, PRESS, TE=12ms7 metabolites quantified using LCModel, absolute quantification using water as internal referenceDTI, 20 directions and 4 b-values (0-1000 s/mm2)6.5x6.5x6.5mm3 - No brain region specificVC, SC, MC, Hip, Tha, HypoT, Str, NCIn vivoLongitudinal @ 4, 5, 6 weeks post-BDLIndirect indicationIn LPS – indication of intra and extra cellular edema supported by no changes in ADCN/A↑Gln↓Glu, tCho, tCr, NAA and InsNo change in Lac-No difference in ADC values between BDL and sham operated rats and neither in water content using gravimetry (Table 1)Statistical changes are between-group over the entire time course with LPS injections as last time point and not by individual time pointsLPS injection ↑water content in brain (gravimetry-Table 1)25
BDL rats79.4T1H MRS, SPECIAL, TE=2.8ms18 metabolites quantified using LCModel, absolute quantification using water as internal referenceChanges post-BDL always compared to those before BDL (week 0)4x7.5x6.5mm3 - No brain region specificIn vivo – longitudinal @ 0, 4, 8 weeks post-BDLIndirect indicationN/A↑Gln and plasma NH4+ post-BDL↓Ins, tCho @ 8 weeks post-BDL↓Glu, Asp @ 8 weeks post-BDLSum of main brain organic osmolytes @ 8 weeks post-BDLPositive correlation between brain Gln and plasma NH4+Brain Gln showed stronger correlations than plasma NH4+ with the rest of metabolites96

Abbreviations: visual cortex (VC), sensorimotor cortex (SC), motor cortex (MC), hippocampus (Hip), thalamus (Tha), hypothalamus (HypoT), striatum (Str), nucleus accumbens (NC), lactate (Lac), glutamine (Gln), taurine (Tau), inositol (Ins), glutamate (Glu), total choline (tCho), total creatine (tCr), N-Acetylaspartate (NAA), aspartate (Asp), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bile duct ligation (BDL), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), SPin ECho, full Intensity Acquired Localized (SPECIAL), point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS), echo time (TE). Authors personal comments are in italics in the comments row.

Table 3

Summary of the Main Results Published to Date Using In Vivo MRI/MRS Techniques in Chronic HE Patients.

HE typeSubjects (n)Magnetic Field (B0)MethodBrain regionType of measurementFindings
CommentsRef
Edema measurementType of edema Cell typeOther
Liver cirrhosis of different originsHE I+HE II =overt HE13-HE-012-MHE10-HE I3-HE II1.5TFast absolute measurement of cerebral water content,TAPIR – T1 measureQUTE – quantitative T2 imagePsychometric testingPu, CR, OWM, FWM, OC, FC, Tha, GP, CN, AL, PLIn vivo - Single pointDirect, absolute assessment of water content (%)N/A-↑0.4% water in HE-0, ↑0.8% in MHE, ↑2.1% in overt HE – WM (FWM, OWM)-No significant water content changes in GM, however 1.9%↑ in GP for overt HECorrelation between CFF and WM water content34
Mild chronic HEControls371.5T1H MRS, STEAM, TE=30ms, quantification of 5 metabolites using the scanner data analysis package and ratios to tCrMidparietal cortex, WM+GM, 12.5-27cm3In vivo - Single pointN/AN/A-trend of ↑Gln and ↓Cho and Ins-no statistics due to small number of patients136
Liver cirrhosis of different originsControls5-no HE10-mHE11-overt HE141.5TT1 weighted images2D CSI, TE=130ms quantification of 3 metabolites using ratios to CrPsychometric and EEG testingBG, temporal and occipital cortexIn vivo - Single pointN/AN/A- ↑Glx/Cr and ↓tCho/Cr in patients- no change in NAA/Cr- stronger ↑Glx/Cr in BG- stronger ↓tCho/Cr in occipital cortex- patients with no HE – normal spectra- patients with overt HE – abnormal spectra137
Liver cirrhosis of different origins4-no HE7-mHE15-overt HE1TT1 weighted SE imagesT1 weighted MT imagesBGIn vivo - Single pointN/AN/AHyperintensity of GP in 17 patients, and a difference between noHE vs mHE vs overt HEHyperintensity of Pu in 5 patientsRelationship between T1 contrast in GP and blood ammonia138
Liver cirrhosis of different originsControls24-no HE4-mHE4-HE I6-HE II1-HE IV202TRoutine T1 and T2 weighted images1H MRS, PRESS, TE=30ms, quantification of 4 metabolites using a Marquardt curve-fitting algorithm and ratios to CrNeuropsychological testsPWM, OGM (2.5cm)3In vivo - Single pointIndirect indication based on ↓mIns/Cr and ↑Gln/Crassumption-Astrocytes swellingAsymptomatic (no HE) patients GM:-↓mIns/CrSubclinical (mHE), overt HE(HE I-IV) GM:-↓mIns/Cr, ↑Gln/Cr-↑NAA/Cr only in over HEAsymptomatic and subclinical HE WM:-↓mIns/CrOvert HE (HE I-IV) WM:-↓mIns/Cr, ↑Gln/Cr, ↓tCho/CrCorrelation between Gln in GM and plasma ammonium (r=0.62)No MRS differences between no HE and mHEMRS differences between mHE and overt HE↑Gln and ↓mIns with HE grade139
Liver cirrhosis of different originsControls8-HE 07-HE I2-HE II131.5T1H MRS, STEAM, TE=30ms, quantification of 4 metabolites using peak integration and ratios to CrNeuropsychological testsPWM, 18mlIn vivo and longitudinal: 30-60 days after LT or 2weeks after a low protein dietN/AN/A-↓mIns/Cr and tCho/Cr in HE- no change in Glx/Cr- no MRS changes observed with diet- no MRS changes 30-60 days after LTCorrelations: mins/Cr and ammonia with the neuropsychological data140
Liver cirrhosis of different origins6-mHE3-overt HE1TCoregistered 3D T1 weighted imagesSemiautomated contour and thresholding programNeuropsychological tests, EEGwhole brain and ventriclesIn vivo , longitudinal: 6weeks after lactulose (n=7), before and 24h after TIPSSIndirect indication of low-grade brain swellingN/ANo structural abnormalities on T1 weighted imagesChange in brain and ventricular size after treatment: ↓brain, ↑ventricles and improved psychometric testing (n=3); ↑brain, ↓ventricles and worsen psychometric testing (n=2)Blood ammonia (66-98 μmol/L - mHE; 85-130 μmol/L- overt HE)No correlations between MRI, HE and liver function88
Liver cirrhosis of different originsControlsMHE24-MHE5-no HE5-HE I5-HE II18101.5TDTI, single shot EPI dual SE sequence, b-value of 1000 s/mm2, 10 directions, MD and FA measuredNeuropsychological testsCC, RIC, LIC, CN, Pu, FWM, OWMIn vivoLongitudinal: 3weeks after lactulose in 10 MHE and 10 controlsIndirect indication↑MD suggestive of ↑interstitial brain waterAssumptionNo HE - ↑MD in CNMHE - ↑MD in CC, RIC, LIC, CNHE - ↑MD in CC, RIC, LIC, CN, Pu, FWM, OWM-no changes in FA- ↓MD in MHE after lactulose treatment and no change in FAMD ↑ from no HE to gr 2 HE- suggestive of increased water with HE gradesCorrelations between NP and MD in CC, RIC.Correlations between NP and MD in CC.Extracellular migration of macromolecules during the cellular osmoregulatory response may result in ↑ acculmulation of extracellular fluid29
Viral liver cirrhosisControls7 –no HE6-HE I1-HE II121.5TDWI, b-values:0, 300, 600,900 s/mm2CN, Pu, GP, OWM, FWM, PWM, ThaIn vivo - Single pointIndirect indication of cytotoxic brain edemaAssumption↑ADC in all brain regions except ThaPatient with HE II showed the highest ADC valuesNo differences in ADC between no-HE and HE IAmmonia and related Gln accumulation might contribute to changes in water motility and contentCorrelation between venous ammonia and ADC values in deep gray and WM regions, except CNAn increase in cell volume reduces the influence of restriction effects on intracellular diffusion pathways leading to ↑ADC64
Liver cirrhosis of different origins9-HE 06-mHE6-HE I1.5TT1 weighted images1H MRS, STEAM, TE=18ms, quantification of 5 metabolites using peak integration and ratios to Cr13N –ammonia and FDG PETPsychometric examinationBG, PWM, FGM, 8cm3In vivo - Single pointN/AN/AMRS changes significant if patients divided into Child classes but not in HE classes-↓mIns/Cr in all 3 brain regions from Child A to C-↓tCho/Cr in BG, GM from Child A to C-↑Glx/Cr in BG, WM from Child A to C-↑NAA/Cr in WM from Child A to CNo controlsCorrelations:-psychometric HE score with Glx/Cr in BG-venous plasma ammonia with MRS in WM-cerebral glucose utilization with mIns/Cr141
Liver cirrhosis of different origins271.5TT2 weighted, FSEFast FLAIR imagesNeurologic assessmentWMIn vivo, longitudinal: before and after LTIndirect indication of brain edemaN/A-focal lesions were identified on the T2 weighted images before LT compatible with small-vessel brain disease in 19 patients- after LT (6-14 months)– average of 21.7% decrease of Wm lesion volumesNo association between WM lesion, age, cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score or laboratory findingsCorrelation: WM lesions and percent improvement in overall cognitive function90
Cirrhotic patients with HE3No detailFLAIR imagesWMIn vivo, longitudinalIndirect indication of brain edemaN/A-supratentorial focal and diffuse WM lesions compatible with small-vessel brain disease which reduced with improvement of HE- these changes were associated with brain edema and support the participation of BBB in the pathogenesis of brain edema in HE89
Liver cirrhosis of different originsControls20-no HE10-mHE241.5TDWI, single shot EPI sequenceNeuropsychological testsPu, GP, Tha, posterior cingulate GM, FWM, PWMIn vivo - Single pointIndirect indication of minimal cellular edema-↑ ADC in mHE in WM compared to no HE-no difference in noHE compared to controls for ADC valuesCorrelations: ADC in WM with venous ammonia; ADC in WM and neuropsychological testsminimal cellular edema with an increase of membrane permeability and increased intracellular diffusivity, as well as changes in the viscosity of the cytoplasm65
Liver cirrhosis of different originsControls33-mHE301.5TProton density, T2 weighted imagesT1 weighted images, MPRAGE sequence1H MRS, 2D L-COS, TE=30ms, quantification of 13 metabolites using Felix NMR software and ratios to CrNeuropsychological testsGPOccipital and prefrontal lobe, 27cm3In vivo - Single pointN/AN/A-GP signal intensity-↑Glx/Cr in both brain regions-↓mICh/Cr, mIns/Cr and Ch_d/Cr in both brain regionsCorrelations between NP tests and MRS ratiosmICh – most discriminant variable142
Liver cirrhosis and overt HEControls41161.5TT2 weighted, FSET1 weighted, SEDTI, single shot EPI sequence, 6 noncollinear directions, 11b-values (0-7500s/mm2), mono and bi-exponential fittingNeuropsychological testsPWM, corticospinal tractIn vivo, longitudinal: before and 1 year after LT (n=24)Indirect indication of increased brain water content based on ↑MDassumption interstitialedema-↑MD for fast diffusion in PWM which returned to normal after LT-↓FA that increased after LT-↑MD for fast and slow diffusion in corticospinal tract, only fast MD returned to normal after LT-↓ fast FA in corticospinal tract with a persistent decrease after LT- edema is reversible after LT but some microstructural changes might persist along the corticospinal tract as suggested by evolution of FA- extracellular edema - PWM- mixed edema -corticospinal tractNo association between DTI parameters and neuropsychological tests22
Viral cirrhosisControls28283T3D FLAIR sequenceBrain volume, vertex based shape analysis – FIRST/FSL softwareTotal intracranial volume – Gaser’s VBM5 toolbox with SPM5Neuropsychological testsDGM (NC, Amy, CN, Hip, GP, Pu, Tha)In vivo, single pointN/AN/A volume in CN and Pu- a smaller volume was proportional to the severity of the disease-shape alteration in Pu, CN and GPCorrelations: decreased DGM volume with poorer cognitive results47
Multiparametric studies / Multimodal studies
Non-alcoholic cirrhosisControls24 (16 with mHE)81.5TT2 weighted, FSET1 weighted, IR SEMT, 2D GE1H MRS, STEAM, TE=20ms, quantification of 5 metabolites using AMARES and ratios to tCrNeuropsychological testsPWM; FWMParietal WM, 8cm3In vivo, single pointIndirect indication of low grade intracellular swelling (↑ water content) based on ↓MTRassumptionNo changes in T2 weighted imagesT1 signal intensity in BG and GP index↓MTR in PWM and FWM↑Glx/Cr in mHE only in PWM↓mIns/Cr and Cho/Cr in all patients in PWMNo changes in NAA/CrCorrelations: MTR with Glx/Cr; MTR with GP index56
Nalc cirrhosis without overt HE (70% mHE)After LTControls2411101.5TT2 weighted, FSET1 weighted, IR SEMT, 2D GE1H MRS, STEAM, TE=20ms, quantification of 5 metabolites using AMARES and ratios to CrNeuropsychological testsPWM; FWMParieto-occipital WM, 8cm3In vivoLongitudinal: before and after LT at 1 month and 1 yearIndirect indication of low grade edema (↑ water content) based on ↓MTRN/ANo changes in T2 weighted imagesT1 signal intensity in BG↓MTR in PWM and FWM↑Glx/Cr in mHE only↓mIns/Cr and Cho/Cr in all patientsNo changes in NAA/CrAfter LT: improvement in MTR; normalization of 1H MRS findings with a lower normalization for mIns/Cr; slower normalization of T1 hyperintensity in GP; neuropsychological impairment showed a rapid improvementCorrelations between MTR and Glx/Cr and plasma osmolarityGlx/Cr and mIns/Cr correlated with liver and neuropsychological functionNo correlation between MTR and neuropsychological functionLow grade edema and mHE are associated with ↑Gln –manifestations of metabolism of ammonia57
PBC stage I-IIPBS stage III-IVControls144111.5TSE proton density imageMT1H MRS, PRESS, TE=135ms, quantification of 3 metabolites using the scanner software (Philips)GP, CN, Pu, Tha, FWM8cm3, in BG and WMIn vivo - Single pointN/AN/A↓MTR in GPNo changes in 1H MRSCorrelations between MTR and fatigue and MTR and blood manganeseMTR changes are not a consequence of HE but rather of altered manganese homeostasis143
Liver cirrhosisAlcoholicsNonalcoholicsControls2616181.5T1H MRS, STEAM, TE=20ms,5 metabolites quantified using LCModel and ratios to CrMT, 2D GE imagesDWI, single shot SE EPI, b-values: 0-500-1000 s/mm2, 3 directionsNeuropsychologic examinationLeft OWM and BG, 8cm3Tha, pons, OWM, GP, Pu, CNTha, pons, OWMIn vivo-single pointIndirect indication of ↑water content based on ↓MTRN/ANalc group in BG: ↓mIns/Cr, Cho/Cr and ↑Glx/CrNalc group in OWM: ↓mIns/Cr and ↑Glx/Cr, NAA/CrAlc group in BG: ↓mIns/Cr, Cho/Cr and ↑Glx/CrAlc group in OWM: ↓mIns/Cr and ↑Glx/CrMRS changes were significant for overt HE and similar in GM and WM↓ MTR in both groupsNo change in ADC only a small trend of with increasing HECorrelations in Nalc: mIns/Cr and Glx/Cr with HE in both regions and MTR with HEOther correlations are presentedNo correlations in Alc groupMR differences between Alc and Nalc –possible microstructural lesions due to chronic alcohol abuse144
Liver cirrhosis of different causes and overt HELiver cirrhosis without overt HEControls24-overt HE991.5TDWI, b-values: 0-500-1000 s/mm2MT, 3D GE images1H MRS, TE=31ms, no sequence mentioned,5 metabolites quantified using AMARES and ratios to CrGP, Pu, Tha, Hip, CR, PGM, PWM2x2x2cm3, PWMIn vivo Longitudinal:24h after diagnosis and 5 days after resolution of HE episodeIndirect indication of ↑water content/low grade edema based on ↓MTR and ↑Glx/Cr, ↓Ins/Crassumption-No change in mean ADC between HE and non-HE patients↓MTR in non-HE↓↓MTR in HE in GP and PGMGlx/Cr –median =1.8 controls, 2.4 non-HE and 4.4 in HE.Ins/Cr – similar between HE and non-HE but lower than controls5 days after no change in MTR, Glx/Cr, Ins/Cr but a ↓ADC in PGMCorrelation between MTR and Glx/Cr in WM in HE patients↓ADC 5 days after – water flux from extracellular to intracellular compartmentBrain regional difference – WM stronger water increaseSmall number of patients145
Liver cirrhosis no evidence of overt HE241.5TProton density and T2 weighted FSET1 weighted SE imaging - Brain volume – SIENAX from FSL1H MRS, PRESS, TE=30ms, metabolites quantified using LCModel and ratios to CrNeuropsychological assessment (n=52)Parieto-occipital WM, 8cm3In vivo, single point: 6 to 12 months post LTN/AN/AImprovement in neuropsychological tests after LT except for 7 patientsBrain smaller volume showed poorer function on motor testsBain metabolites were in normal rangeMRI and MRS data only after LTHE has an effect on cognitive function after LT, likely because it results in neuronal and brain volume loss53
Stable liver cirrhosis of different causes (no-HE+mHE)133T3D T1 weighted, T2 weighted and FLAIRDTI, EPI, 2 b values:0-1000s/mm2, 6 directions1H MRS, PRESS, TE=36ms, 6 metabolites quantified using QUEST/jMRUI and water as internal referencePsychometric tests: PHES, CDRSWMFrontal WM, 8cm3In vivoLongitudinal at 0, 140 and 170 min after ingestion of amino acid capsulesIndirect indication of in changes in brain water compartmentalization based on ↑trADCN/ANo change in the CDRS after challenge↑trADC (9%) after the challenge↓Ins after challenge, no change in Gln, Glu, NAA, Cr, ChoNo change in brain volume. Ammonia can directly drive changes in water distribution.No vasogenic mechanisms146No controlsCorrelations: changes in trADC vs blood ammonia, changes in blood ammonia vs brain Gln, changes in trADC and brain InsGlial swelling and redistribution of extra-intracellular water during HA – likely mechanisms of edema in HE14651
Liver cirrhosis of different causesControls6-HE II10-HE III2-HE IV83TProton density and T2 weighted FSE and fast FLAIRT1 weighted imagingDWI, single shot EPI, 4 b values:0-3000s/mm21H MRS, PRESS, TE=30ms, 5 metabolites quantified using LCModel and ratios to CrHE patients: lactulose and rifaximin-severity grades were lower for the MRIPWM, corticospinal tractWM-parieto-occipital region, 8cm3In vivo –first 5 days after hospitalizationLongitudinal – 6 weeks later (n=14)Indirect indication of extracellular edema based on ↑ADC which returned to normal after 6 weeksassumption↑ADC in patients vs controls↑Gln/Cr in HE patients vs controls (2.4±0.78 vs 0.22±0.08)↓Ins/Cr and Cho/CrNo change for Glu/Cr and NAA/Cr↓ADC, ↓Gln/Cr and ↑Ins/Cr after 6 weeks in patients recovering after HEADC in PWM similar to controls but ↑ in corticospinal tract 6 weeks afterCorrelations: Gln/Cr with HE grades, Gln/Cr and blood ammonia↑ADC in patients with dehydration, ↓Ins/Cr in patients with hyponatremiaBrain edema does not seem to be directly responsible for the neurological manifestation23
Well-compensated liver cirrhosis of different causes and previous mHEControls22213TVolumetric imaging – 3D T1weighted sequence, SIENA – FSL software FSLfMRI, visuomotor task1H MRS, PRESS, TE=36ms, 4 metabolites quantified using ratios to CrPsychometric testing: CDRS, PHES8cm3, left BGIn vivoLongitudinal: 4weeks after LOLAN/AN/ANo change in brain volumeNo change in activation after visual task before and after LOLAGreater activation in motor task after LOLANo Change in Glx/Cr, Cho/Cr, Ins/Cr, NAA/Cr pre and post-LOLAImprovements in CDRS and PHES after LOLACorrelations between the fMRI and psychometric tests52
Liver cirrhosis with mHE203TDTI, single shot SE EPI, b=1000s/mm2, 60 directions, FA, MD –FSL tool1H MRS, PROBE, TE=35ms, 4 metabolites quantified using LCModel and ratios to CrfMRI, 2 tasks: N-back and inhibitory control testsCognitive testing12 ROI – e.g. FWM, pWM, CC, IC, EC, cingulumACC; pGM, rpWM, 8cm3In vivoLongitudinal: before and 8 weeks after rifaximin treatmentN/A↑FA, no change in MD, imply cytotoxic edema correctionNo changes in MDSmall ↑FA in 5 ROIs after rifaximinNo metabolite changes before and after rifaximinHigher activation in some brain areas after rifaximinImprovement in cognitive tests after rifaximinImprovement in WM integrity after rifaximinNo control or placebo group93
Liver cirrhosis with mHE or HE IControls30163T1H MRS, MEGA-PRESS, TE=68ms, 4 metabolites quantified using LCModel and ratios to CrFast absolute measurement of cerebral water content34Psychometric testsOccipital lobe, sensory and motor cortex–“hand knob”, 27cm3 eachIn vivo - single pointDirect, absolute assessment of water content (%)N/A↑Gln/Cr in mHE and HE 1 in both voxels↓Ins/Cr in mHE and HE 1 in both voxels compared to controls↑GSx/Cr in mHE and HE 1↓GABA/Cr in mHE and HE1 in occipital lobeNo change in water contentMEGA-PRESS sequence was optimized for GABA and not glutathione.Correlations: Gln/Cr with blood ammonia and CFF; Ins/Cr with ammonia and CFF, ↑GSx/Cr with ammoniaSeveral other correlations are mentionedEdema is only marginally responsible for symptoms of covert HE147
Liver cirrhosisAlc (n=46)Nalc (n=102)No Controls19-no HE27-HE48-no HE44-HE1.5TTwo sitesT1 weighted images (MPRAGE) -VBM using FSL-VBMDTI, single shot SE EPI, b=1000s/mm2, 30 directions, FA, MD, CS –FSL tool1H MRS, PRESS, TE=35ms, 4 metabolites quantified using LCModel and ratios to Cr13 ROI – e.g. FWM, pWM, CC, IC, cingulumACC; pGM, rpWM, 8cm3In vivoLongitudinal: 1 year afterIndirect indication of interstitial edema based on ↑MD and CSassumptionGM density reduced in Alc vs NalcAlc vs Nalc: ↓FA, ↑MD, ↑CS in all ROIHE status affects Nalc (FA and CS)Alc vs Nalc: ↑Glx, ↓Ins (rpWM, ACC), ↓Ins (pGM)no HE: ↑Glx, ↓InsHE: no differenceIn Nalc HE: ↑Glx in all 3 regionsNo changes in brain metabolites 1 year later148
Liver cirrhosisControls7-no HE7-mHE63TT2 weighted, FLAIR and T1 weighted images (MPRAGE/SPGR sequence)DWI*MT*Neuropsychological testsBlood ammonia and cytokinesFWM, PWM, IC, BGIn vivo Longitudinal: 8 weeks after lactulose and rifaximin treatmentIndirect indication of low-grade brain edema in mHE based on ↓MTRN/ADiffuse atrophy–47.9% of patientsHyperintensity in BG-60.8% of patientsNo DWI results↓ MTR in mHE in FWM, PWM, IC and BG compared to controls↓ MTR in mHE compared to non HE – PWM, IC, BG↑MTR after treatment except for BG in mHENo change in MTR in no HE after treatmentCorrelations:-IL-6 with MTR in PWM and IC-ammonia with MTR in PWM-NP with MTR in PWM, IC-no correlations after treatment↑ammonia in mHE and noHE with mHE>no HE↑IL-1 and IL-6 in mHE48
Cirrhotic patients of different causesControls26193TVolumetric imaging – 3D T1weighted sequence,T2 weighted sequenceDTI, single-shot EPI sequence, 32 directions, b=1000s/mm2, ADC and FA measured, DTI Studio softwareMT, 2D GE, ImageJ softwarePsychometric testingGenu, body and splenium of CC, ACR, PCRFWM, Pu, GP, Tha, CNIn vivo-single pointIndirect indication based on ↓MTR and ↑ADCAssumptionNo change in total brain volume↑ADC in genus and body of CCNo difference in FA↓MTR in GP (5.8%), FWM (4%), CN, Pu,8 patients had mHETrend of ↓MTR in mHE compared with other patients in FWM in GPTrend of ↓MTR in patients with alcohol-related disease↓MTR and ↑ADC might demonstrate cytoplasmic changes of astrocytesChanges in astrocytes membrane permeability /redistribution of macromolecules50
Well-compensated liver cirrhosis of different causesControls22223TVolumetric imaging – 3D T1weighted sequence, FMRIB software (FSL)T2 weighted sequenceDTI, single-shot EPI sequence, 15 directions, b=1000s/mm2, ADC and FA measured, DTI Studio softwareMT, 2D GE, ImageJ software1H MRS, PRESS, TE=36ms, 5 metabolites quantified using AMARES and ratios to CrPsychometric testingFWM, Pu, GP, Tha, CNGenu, body and splenium of CC15x15x15mm3, left BGIn vivoLongitudinal: 4weeks after LOLAN/AN/ANo change in total brain volumeNo change in ADC or FA nor in their relation to neuropsychiatric status↓MTR in GP, Tha in patients with cirrhosis↓MTR in FWM only in mHENo change in metabolite ratios7 patients out of 22 had mHEPsychometric performance was improved in 4 mHE patients after LOLA.No other changes were found after LOLA49
Summary of the Main Results Published to Date Using Different Ex Vivo Techniques in Chronic HE Animal Models. Abbreviations: Frontal cortex (FC), Cerebral cortex (CC), parietal cortex (PC), gray matter (GM), oxidative stress (OS), reactive oxygen species (ROS), blood brain barrier (BBB), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lactate (Lac), glutamine (Gln), taurine (Tau), inositol (Ins), myo-inositol (mIns), glutamate (Glu), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), hyperammonemia (HA), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), bile duct ligation (BDL), ornithine phenylacetate (OP), oral ammonia absorbent engineered activated carbon microspheres (AST-120), dichloroacetate (DCA), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS), high protein/ammoniagenic diet (HD). Authors personal comments are in italics in the comments row. Summary of the Main Results Published to Date Now Using Different In Vivo MRI/MRS Techniques in Chronic HE Animal Models. Abbreviations: visual cortex (VC), sensorimotor cortex (SC), motor cortex (MC), hippocampus (Hip), thalamus (Tha), hypothalamus (HypoT), striatum (Str), nucleus accumbens (NC), lactate (Lac), glutamine (Gln), taurine (Tau), inositol (Ins), glutamate (Glu), total choline (tCho), total creatine (tCr), N-Acetylaspartate (NAA), aspartate (Asp), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bile duct ligation (BDL), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), SPin ECho, full Intensity Acquired Localized (SPECIAL), point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS), echo time (TE). Authors personal comments are in italics in the comments row. Summary of the Main Results Published to Date Using In Vivo MRI/MRS Techniques in Chronic HE Patients. There are many studies implicating brain edema in the pathogenesis of HE; in patients with acute HE, brain edema has been shown to play a crucial role in the associated neurological deterioration. Patients who have cirrhosis with chronic HE may present with some degree of brain edema,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 but it is not known if this is a universal finding. In addition, the correlations/associations between brain edema and neurological damage in chronic HE are not yet clearly established, with some studies showing a correlation and others not (for more details please see Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). This leads to the controversial question as to whether brain edema can be considered a valid endpoint in the evaluation of HE.1, 23 By extension, in rats with bile duct ligation (BDL), a type-C model of HE, brain edema, and HE are present. Other studies suggest that brain edema is not implicated in the pathogenesis of HE; in BDL rats, brain edema was also shown to be absent with no modifications in their neurological status 4–6 weeks after surgery,26, 27 while lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection was shown to increase water content and alter the level of consciousness in these rats (for more details please see Table 1, Table 2). Moreover, in rats with portocaval anastomosis (PCA), a type-B model of HE (encephalopathy associated with portal-systemic bypass and no intrinsic hepatocellular disease), brain edema is not present.24, 28 Finally, in rats with ALF, it was shown that motor tract function did not improve following attenuation of brain edema with the hypertonic solution, mannitol, while an acute injection of ammonia to PCA rats led to severe alterations of motor tract function, without the development of brain edema. It has been suggested that these discrepancies might be model specific (HE type A vs B vs C), since cerebral edema differs in terms of the temporality of the disease.1, 2, 29 In chronic HE, there is sufficient time for effective compensation and stabilization of the osmolyte shift to counteract the osmotic imbalance induced by the astrocytic accumulation of glutamine. In acute HE, the natural history of the syndrome is rapid and does not allow the system to compensate for metabolic changes. Moreover, in advanced chronic HE, there might be little room for activating additional volume-regulatory mechanisms against future challenges of cell volume (such as infection or neuroinflammation), which might explain the kinetics of HE occurrence and the episodic or persistent appearance of clinically overt cerebral edema in end-stage liver disease. Nevertheless, all these assumptions remain to be determined. Moreover, these results raise the question as to the role of brain edema in the neurological alterations linked to HE and whether HE and brain edema are the manifestations of the same pathophysiological mechanism or of two different cerebral manifestations of brain dysfunction in liver disease. It has been also postulated that brain edema may be a predisposing factor in the development of HE or a terminal complication.1, 2

Methods to measure brain edema ex vivo and in vivo in animal models and humans with chronic HE

Several methods have been used to measure brain water content and consequently brain edema either ex-vivo or in vivo. Some of these methods will be briefly described below, and a summary of the main results published to date are listed in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3. of water content using dissected tissue from sacrificed animals (no studies on human HE patients) are performed using the dry/wet weight technique or the specific gravity method.1, 31, 32 The advantage of these two techniques is that both of them allow a direct/absolute estimation of the water amount in the brain. However, these techniques do not provide any information on the type of edema and they are endpoint measurements. Therefore, no longitudinal measurements on the same animal are possible. Table 1 presents a summary of the results published to date on type C HE animal models, while more details on these two techniques can be found in the published literature.1, 2 The gravimetry technique appears to be most widely used and to have some advantages, such as a better specificity, together with the possibility of being able to use a smaller quantity of samples.1, 2 However, at the time of writing, there are only a few published studies using these techniques, and the results appear to be controversial. At 3 or 4 weeks post-BDL, no increase in water content was measured in BDL rats using the gravimetry technique, while an increase in water content at 4 weeks post-BDL was measured using the dry-wet technique (from ∼76% in sham operated rats to ∼78% in BDL rats). At 6 weeks only, one group measured an increase in brain water content using the gravimetry technique (from 78.35 ± 0.17% in sham-operated rats to 79.46 ± 0.28% in BDL rats), while others did not observe this (please see Table 1 for more details). use several MRI or magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) techniques, which have the main advantage of being non-invasive and thus allowing studies on the same individual longitudinally. The phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is based on the interaction of magnetic moments of nuclei of different atoms within the main (static) magnetic field (B0, usually expressed in Tesla). The magnetic moment of nuclei is associated with a nuclear spin (a form of angular momentum) characterized by a value called a spin number. The nucleus is defined by its number of protons and neutrons and its total nuclear spin. Nuclei with an odd number of protons or neutrons possess a non-zero spin and magnetic moment. Some of these nuclei have a spin number of ½ (e.g. 1H, 31P, 13C, and 15N), which is favorable for applications of magnetic resonance. MRI is mainly focused on imaging the hydrogen nucleus (1H) of water, since water is present in high concentrations in biological tissues, and 1H is the most sensitive nucleus in terms of high natural abundance (>99.9%) and intrinsic sensitivity (high gyromagnetic ratio), leading to a high signal-to-noise ratio. MRI techniques are presently available to detect subtle functional or structural changes in the human brain. The only MRI method allowing a direct in vivo water content measurement is brain water mapping, and this technique appears to be able to detect changes of approximately 1% in total brain water content, but it lacks specificity in relationship to the etiology of the water accumulation. Indirect or relative information regarding the content of water in the brain can be obtained using magnetization transfer (MT), diffusion-weighted or diffusion-tensor imaging (DWI or DTI), fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI methodologies and MRS. All these techniques can provide some evidence of increased water content in HE, but they lack specificity in drawing conclusions about absolute water content changes, in addition to elucidating the origin of these perturbations in the brain. Therefore, these changes provide insight and pointers toward pathological mechanisms but are mainly interpretable simply as imaging manifestations of brain edema.1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 35

Volumetric MRI in Chronic HE

MRI-based brain volumetry has been used in chronic HE to identify volume changes in a quantitative manner (total brain volume and/or specific brain regions) from T1-weighted structural MR images (Table 3). These volumetric methods are mainly based on brain segmentation (separation into non-brain and brain tissue, with the latter being sub-segmented into gray matter [GM], white matter [WM], and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). As the position of the patient and, possibly, the shape and size of the brain are likely to have changed between examinations, co-registration is needed in longitudinal assessments, and this involves several MRI head images as a starting point. Advanced software packages can align or register brain images and delineate or segment tissue boundaries between CSF, cerebral WM, and GM. The final images can then be used for volumetry or morphometry measures.36, 38 Qualitative visual assessment of cerebral edema on MRI is usually only possible in ALF. In minimal chronic HE, quantitative assessment of small percentage volume changes is only possible with advanced brain mapping software packages, where the conflicting effects of alcohol or age-related atrophy are assessed alongside the resultant changes in brain size due to HE. Several software packages are available for performing brain segmentation and volumetry/morphometry (including FSL software library, 3D slicer, SIENA, and SIENAX).36, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 More details on the methodology behind brain volumetry in the context of HE can be found in the published literature.14, 15, 17, 18, 46 The main volumetric MRI results obtained in chronic HE are summarized in Table 3. Some studies have shown a decrease in brain volume in HE47, 48 mainly in GM while others have not.49, 50, 51, 52 In addition, a relationship between brain volume and HE was sometimes observed.47, 53 It is important to underline that functionally well-compensated patients with cirrhosis showed no brain volume changes. There are a few reasons that could explain these discrepancies: the small number of studies performed to date and the small percentage volume changes associated with chronic HE, where the usage of higher magnetic fields might be more illuminating. The changes in brain volume measured in chronic HE were mainly associated with brain atrophy, but these findings require validation by other groups and additional studies using different multiparametric MRI techniques.

Magnetization Transfer Imaging in Chronic HE

MT was developed as a technique for manipulating tissue contrast for better image visualization on MRI,54, 55 also allowing an indirect measurement of bound and free water compartments in the brain. MT can be affected by variations in a variety of factors, including heavy metal concentration, membrane fluidity, and total water content.49, 50, 56 Of note, MT pulse sequences allow measurement of MT ratios (MTRs), which represent a quantitative tissue characteristic, reflecting the behavior of normally MR-invisible protons, bound to intracellular macromolecules. MTR measurement can detect alterations in brain water content that may not otherwise be seen using standard MR techniques. From a technical perspective, magnetization can be transferred between bound and free water pools bi-directionally through direct interaction between spins, transfer of nuclei, or through direct chemical means. Under normal circumstances, MT is the same in both directions, but MT pulse sequences can be designed to saturate the magnetization in the bound pool, leaving the free pool mostly unaffected. Such saturation of the bound pool causes a substantial reduction in the amount of the magnetization. Consequently, there is little transfer of the magnetization back to the free pool, with the MR longitudinal relaxation time reduced as a consequence. In chronic HE, MTR values have shown an overall trend toward decrease and appear to be one of the most consistent MRI findings as shown by the majority of the studies presented in Table 3. The decrease in MTR values has been demonstrated to be present in several brain regions and has been reported to be small in magnitude (around 10%). Therefore, the main interpretation of this decrease includes the presence of low-grade astrocytic/cerebral edema which might also be linked to alterations in membrane permeability and cytoplasmic structure and to subsequent shifts in the distribution of macromolecules and intracellular water, with subtle alterations in intracellular and extracellular edema.16, 49, 50, 56, 57 Several other hypothesis have also been put forward. These are linked to damage to myelin or to axonal membrane and deposition of paramagnetic substances. In addition, some interesting correlations were reported by some studies between MTR values and MRS findings, the globus pallidus index, blood ammonia levels, and serum manganese concentrations, while the correlations with the neuropsychological tests are controversial (Table 3). Additional multiparametric MRI and multimodal studies would be useful to establish a clear link between MTR values and their brain regional dependence, HE severity, MRS-measurable metabolites, and other important findings in chronic HE.

Diffusion-Weighted/Diffusion-Tensor Imaging in Chronic HE

DWI/DTI is a MR technique allowing quantification of water molecule movement.58, 59, 60, 61 Water molecule diffusion follows the principles of Brownian motion. Unconstrained, water molecule movement is random and equal in all directions. This random movement is described as “isotropic”. However, motion of water molecules in structured environments is restricted due to physical surroundings and is described as being “anisotropic” (unequal in all directions). In the brain, the microstructure within GM and WM restricts water molecule movement. On average, water molecules tend to move parallel to WM tracts, as opposed to perpendicular to them. The molecules' motion in the x, y, and z planes and the correlation between these directions is described by a mathematical construct known as the diffusion tensor. In mathematics, a tensor defines the properties of a three-dimensional ellipsoid, the diffusion tensor describing the magnitude, the degree of anisotropy, and the orientation of diffusion anisotropy. For the diffusion tensor to be determined, diffusion data in a minimum of six non-collinear directions are required. This process is known as DTI. This technique collects detailed information allowing insight into the microstructure found within an area of interest within the brain, whose characteristic features are on the same length scale as the micrometer scale displacement of water molecules. These features may be used to map and characterize the three-dimensional diffusion of water as a function of spatial location. Factors calculated include the mean diffusivity (MD), degree of anisotropy, and direction of the diffusivities. MD is a measure of water diffusivity, dependent upon the surrounding chemical environment and the presence of obstacles to movement at a cellular and subcellular level. In parallel, using differently-weighted DWI images, a measure of diffusion can also be calculated. The different images can be mapped to create an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) image. In chronic HE, where less obvious water shifts may be occurring, there is, nevertheless, a mild increase in ADC in patients with cirrhosis, even when HE may not be clinically overt, as in minimal HE. Even though the majority of previously published studies observed an increase in ADC (or MD), the overall interpretation of the diffusion data is difficult and sometimes controversial (Table 3). It is important to note that some studies were unable to report any change in ADC (or MD) values. The overall agreement appears to be linked to an increase in water content. However, some authors tend to believe that this increase in ADC is related to an increase in extracellular water content, others to astrocytes swelling while some believe that it reflects minimal cellular edema with an increase of membrane permeability and increased intracellular diffusivity, as well as changes in the viscosity of the cytoplasm. The very basic interpretation of a two compartment model with intracellular or cytotoxic edema (linked to a decrease in ADC) and extracellular or vasogenic edema (linked to an increase in ADC) is not straightforward and is simplistic in its interpretation. As previously mentioned, it is rare for one of the two mechanisms to exist in isolation, and sometimes cytotoxic and vasogenic edema might coexist. DWI/DTI remains an indirect probe, because extracting quantitative metrics, characterizing the underlying tissue microstructure requires modeling of the diffusion signal. The limited specificity of DTI metrics and the need for biophysical modeling of the tissue to achieve specificity is discussed in the published literature.

Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Chronic HE

In vivo localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) is complementary to MRI and is a powerful technique to investigate brain metabolism of rodents and humans non-invasively and in a longitudinal manner.67, 68 It provides a spectrum as a readout, consisting of peaks at different resonant frequencies. In single voxel MRS, spectra are acquired from a well-defined volume, positioned in a specific brain region, using a combination of band-selective radiofrequency pulses and magnetic field gradients.33, 69 1H MRS is one of the most sensitive techniques, and nearly all brain metabolites contain hydrogen nuclei. An important number of biologically relevant metabolites can be observed and quantified in vivo within minutes. This technique can detect low molecular weight metabolites at concentrations as low as 0.5 mM. Reliable quantification of the concentration of known metabolites and the extension of the number of quantifiable metabolites represent the main goal of in vivo 1H MRS.70, 71, 72, 73, 74 Accurate and precise quantification of brain metabolites is challenging and depends on hardware performance, pulse sequence design and adjustment, data processing, and quantification strategies. The choice of data processing software is very important, since many algorithms depend on user input, which might lead to inaccuracies. Moreover, published recommendations encourage the usage of quantification algorithms where metabolite concentrations are determined by fitting the measured in vivo 1H MRS spectrum to a linear combination of spectra of individual metabolites (the metabolite basis set). In clinical settings, metabolite concentration ratios are often used (mainly ratios to total creatine [tCr]); however, absolute metabolite concentrations are more valuable especially when tCr might change. 1H MRS was among the first techniques which provided indications of the presence of low-grade cerebral edema in chronic HE by reporting changes in brain organic osmolytes (an increase in glutamine [Gln] concentration, together with a decrease in myo-inositol [mIns] that partially compensates for increased intracellular osmotic pressure).30, 75 The glial localization of these osmolytes suggests a disturbance of astrocyte volume homeostasis.30, 75, 76 However, the information provided by 1H MRS is an indirect evidence of astrocyte swelling. A detailed description of the main findings using 1H MRS in chronic HE in human patients can be found in Table 3. In clinical settings, the MRS acquisitions were performed at magnetic fields of 1.5T-3T and echo times (TEs) ≥20 ms, leading to the quantification of few metabolites (e.g. the sum of glutamine and glutamate [Glx], tCr [sometimes also simply called creatine {Cr}], total choline [tCho] and myo-inositol or inositol [mIns or Ins]). It is interesting to note that the stronger changes in brain metabolites (Glx/Cr, mIns/Cr, and tCho/Cr) were observed in overt HE, while in minimal HE, the decrease in mIns/Cr was observed more often than an increase in Glx/Cr. Finally, in functionally well-compensated liver cirrhosis, no significant changes were measured. This raises the question as to whether few metabolite changes occur in well-compensated liver disease patients, or if these changes are very small, and thus they are not detected at lower magnetic fields. Therefore, nowadays the availability of high magnetic fields (≥7T), together with MRS acquisitions at shorter TEs (<10–20 ms) might offer opportunities to better quantify and understand brain metabolites changes in chronic HE. Using this methodology, both in animal models and humans, about 19 brain metabolites can be quantified in the brain: glutamate, Gln, aspartate, γ-aminobutyrate, and glycine (neurotransmitters and associated metabolites); glucose, lactate (Lac), Cr, phosphocreatine, and alanine (markers of energy metabolism); taurine and mIns (markers of osmoregulation); phosphocholine, glycerophosphocholine, phosphoethanolamine, N-acetylaspartate, and N-acetylaspartylglutamate (markers of myelination/cell proliferation); and ascorbate and glutathione (antioxidants).67, 70, 71, 73, 77, 78 Table 3 also presents some interesting correlations between MRS changes and other MRI or blood parameters. In addition, some brain regional differences were observed in brain metabolites, but this observation requires further validation. To date, brain water mapping is the direct method for absolute quantification of water content in vivo in humans. In animal models, a multimodal approach is desired combining in vivo and longitudinal measurements with an ex vivo technique assessing the absolute brain water content. This combination provides additional information on the temporal resolution of the onset of brain edema by monitoring the progression of the syndrome longitudinally. None of these techniques provides information on the type of the edema or which cell is involved. Therefore, using parallel electron microscopy or a similar technique would be very useful in animal models.

Brain edema and HE treatments

Drug therapy for HE largely focuses on removal of bacterial-derived toxins and manipulating gut flora levels, but underlying precipitating factors, such as gastrointestinal hemorrhage, infections, electrolyte disturbance, renal insufficiency, the use of psychoactive drugs, and the presence of constipation and the advent of ALF must be investigated and treated accordingly. Published studies suggest that probiotics, non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose and lactitol), and non-absorbable antibiotics (such as rifaximin) can be useful in treating HE and may have an effect on brain water content.80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 The MRI/MRS results of some studies using different treatment strategies are detailed in Table 3. Non-absorbable disaccharides include lactulose and lactitol, which are well-known for their laxative effects; they also reduce the colonic pH and decrease gut mucosal uptake of glutamine. This reduces synthesis and absorption of ammonia. There has been one study demonstrating a small reduction in brain volume in patients with chronic HE on lactulose using a co-registration technique while another study observed a reduction in MD using the same treatment. Changes in T2 FLAIR WM lesions and ventricular volumes have been studied in chronic HE patients and following liver transplantation. Moreover, an improvement in MTR and MD was also observed after liver transplantation,22, 57 while normal MRS spectra were also acquired after liver transplantation. Rifaximin is a minimally absorbed oral antibiotic with few adverse effects, no reported drug-drug interactions, and a low risk of inducing bacterial resistance. A multicenter trial published in 2010 found that HE remission was prolonged in rifaximin-treated patients, the drug exhibiting a protective effect, and reducing hospitalization rates. Ahluwalia et al. demonstrated a reduction in fractional anisotropy (but not in MD), along with significant improvement in cognition, including working memory, after rifaximin treatment in a group of 16 minimal HE patients, indicating an effect on brain water content.

Overall pathogenic mechanisms

In the brain, glutamine synthesis is largely confined to astrocytes. In case of liver disease or shunting, brain ammonium accumulation increases astrocytic Gln, raising intracellular osmotic pressure and leading to astrocyte swelling and brain edema.1, 30, 71, 76, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 It is generally accepted that in hyperammonemia, excess glutamine compromises astrocyte function and morphology and thus participates in the development of HE. Although the relationship between cause and effect, leading to HE, and the related spectrum of neurological symptoms remains unclear, ammonium and glutamine appear to be a common thread in the complex and multifactorial model of HE pathogenesis, since both precipitate a cascade of metabolic events that will ultimately result in the neurological disturbance. Ammonium triggers not only the increase in glutamine which will consequently perturb astrocyte metabolism and increase the intracellular osmotic pressure but also a series of signaling events: oxidative stress, activation of transcription factors, signaling kinases, mitochondrial permeability transition, and alterations in the neuronal processes growth.3, 30, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 Moreover, increased astrocytic Gln can lead to the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore111, 112 and interfere with glutamatergic neurotransmission. More details about Gln-related hypotheses, related evidences, and controversies can be found in study by Brusilow et al. In addition, other pathogenic mechanisms are also involved in HE: inflammation, alterations in neurotransmission, cerebral energy disturbances, Lac accumulation, and probably others more.114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 Even though astrocyte swelling and consequently brain edema are believed to act as a mediator in the neurological manifestations in HE, their pathophysiological role remains elusive. In the past years, several hypotheses have been elaborated regarding the relationship between brain metabolism changes, cellular changes, and cell swelling/edema in HE. The authors of the “osmotic gliopathy theory” suggested that there is an initial pronounced osmotic stress in the astrocytes due to increased glutamine synthesis. With time, there is a gradual compensation as reflected by decreased organic osmolytes, and this compensation is accompanied by increased water in the extracellular space. However, this compensation cannot be complete since there is evidence that astrocyte swelling occurs, which may be more pronounced in the more severe disease. The Trojan horse hypothesis105, 131 is another mechanism by which glutamine is considered to contribute to the pathogenesis of HE. It postulates that glutamine is transported into mitochondria, where it undergoes hydrolysis thus yielding high levels of ammonia and finally resulting in deleterious effects (e.g. induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition and oxidative/nitrative stress leading to astrocyte dysfunction and cell swelling). More details about this theory and related controversies can be found in study by Brusilow et al. The transporter hypothesis postulates that increased Gln synthesis coupled with a partial suppression of SNAT3- and SNAT5-mediated efflux of Gln from astrocytes results in an accumulation of Gln in the astrocytic compartment leading to osmotic stress. It is believed that small increases in astrocytes water content may have an important impact on astrocyte morphology, function, and gene expression despite the absence of clinically overt increases of intracranial pressure in chronic HE. For example, prolonged osmotic and/or metabolic stress has been shown to cause production of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial permeability transition, and inflammatory signals, which have physiological and pathophysiological consequences. Altered astrocyte function eventually leads to deranged neuroglial communication and neurotransmitter system imbalance, which will impact synaptic plasticity and oscillatory cerebral networks, thus enabling a pathological environment characterizing HE.

Conclusion

Although some of the discussed studies established a link between brain edema and alterations in cognitive function, the role of brain edema as a neuropathological feature/consequence or cause of HE remains controversial. It was speculated that different degrees of astrocyte swelling or brain edema might have different effects on cerebral function. In addition, brain edema might act synergistically with other pathogenic factors or only be a predisposing or precipitating factor in the development of HE. The in vivo MRI/MRS studies were very helpful in the process of evaluating brain edema in chronic HE and in improving our understanding of the pathophysiological alterations in HE. As can be seen form Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, there is an overall tendency in using multimodal (more than two MRI/MRS techniques) and multiparametric (MRS/MRS studies combined with neurological tests, biochemical analysis) approaches. However, additional in vivo, longitudinal, and multiparametric/multimodal studies are required (in humans and animal models) to elucidate the relationship between liver function, brain metabolism changes, cellular changes, cell swelling/edema, and neurological manifestations in chronic HE. The brain regional difference in chronic HE also remains an open question.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have none to declare.
  141 in total

1.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: its principle and applications.

Authors:  S Mori; P B Barker
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1999-06-15

Review 2.  Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: a clinical manifestation of astrocyte swelling and low-grade cerebral edema?

Authors:  D Häussinger; G Kircheis; R Fischer; F Schliess; S vom Dahl
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Neurotransmitter dysfunction in hepatic encephalopathy: new approaches and new findings.

Authors:  R F Butterworth
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.584

4.  Magnetization transfer ratio values and proton MR spectroscopy of normal-appearing cerebral white matter in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  A Rovira; E Grivé; S Pedraza; A Rovira; J Alonso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Authors:  A T Blei; J Córdoba
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Cerebral energy metabolism in hepatic encephalopathy and hyperammonemia.

Authors:  K V Rao; M D Norenberg
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.584

8.  The development of low-grade cerebral edema in cirrhosis is supported by the evolution of (1)H-magnetic resonance abnormalities after liver transplantation.

Authors:  J Córdoba; J Alonso; A Rovira; C Jacas; F Sanpedro; L Castells; V Vargas; C Margarit; J Kulisewsky; R Esteban; J Guardia
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Hepatic encephalopathy--definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the working party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998.

Authors:  Peter Ferenci; Alan Lockwood; Kevin Mullen; Ralph Tarter; Karin Weissenborn; Andres T Blei
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 10.  Neurobiology of ammonia.

Authors:  Vicente Felipo; Roger F Butterworth
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.685

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral edema and liver disease: Classic perspectives and contemporary hypotheses on mechanism.

Authors:  Eric M Liotta; W Taylor Kimberly
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Dieter Häussinger; Radha K Dhiman; Vicente Felipo; Boris Görg; Rajiv Jalan; Gerald Kircheis; Manuela Merli; Sara Montagnese; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Alfons Schnitzler; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Hendrik Vilstrup
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 65.038

Review 3.  The Role of Intestinal Bacteria and Gut-Brain Axis in Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Authors:  Zefeng Chen; Jingsheng Ruan; Dinghua Li; Min Wang; Zhiwei Han; Wenxia Qiu; Guobin Wu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 4.  Lights and Shadows in Hepatic Encephalopathy Diagnosis.

Authors:  Piero Amodio; Sara Montagnese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Enhanced Meningeal Lymphatic Drainage Ameliorates Neuroinflammation and Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhotic Rats.

Authors:  Shao-Jung Hsu; Chihao Zhang; Jain Jeong; Seong-Il Lee; Matthew McConnell; Teruo Utsumi; Yasuko Iwakiri
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Alexander Lin; Ovidiu Andronesi; Wolfgang Bogner; In-Young Choi; Eduardo Coello; Cristina Cudalbu; Christoph Juchem; Graham J Kemp; Roland Kreis; Martin Krššák; Phil Lee; Andrew A Maudsley; Martin Meyerspeer; Vladamir Mlynarik; Jamie Near; Gülin Öz; Aimie L Peek; Nicolaas A Puts; Eva-Maria Ratai; Ivan Tkáč; Paul G Mullins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.044

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.