| Literature DB >> 31359842 |
Roy La Touche1,2,3,4, Macarena Sánchez-Vázquez1, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez1,2, María Prieto-Aldana1,2, Alba Paris-Alemany1,2,3,4, Gonzalo Navarro-Fernández1,2.
Abstract
The objective was to compare two different instruction modes used to teach patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) to perform a lumbar motor control task. The three intervention instruction modes used were: common verbal explanation of a motor task based on a motor control therapeutic exercise (MCTE-control group), MTCE instructed using motor imagery (MI) and MCTE instructed using tactile feedback (TF). The main outcome measure was lumbar motor control of the neutral position test. Forty-eight patients with CLBP were randomly allocated into three groups of 16 patients per group. The MI strategy was the most effective mode for developing the motor control task in an accurate and controlled manner, obtaining better outcomes than TF or verbal instruction.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic low back pain; motor control; motor imagery; stabilization
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31359842 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1645087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mot Behav ISSN: 0022-2895 Impact factor: 1.328