Literature DB >> 31359100

Trends in knee arthroscopy utilization: a gap in knowledge translation.

Ryan M Degen1, Yekaterina Lebedeva2, Trevor B Birmingham2,3, Jacquelyn D Marsh2, Alan M J Getgood4, J Robert Giffin4, Kevin Willits4, Robert B Litchfield4, Dianne Bryant2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the longitudinal trends in knee arthroscopy utilization in relation to published negative randomized controlled trials, focusing on annual rates, patient demographics and associated 30-day post-operative complications.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology billing codes to identify arthroscopy cases between 2006 and 2016. 30-day post-operative complications were identified, and potential risk factors analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: 68,346 patients underwent knee arthroscopy, of which 47,446 (69.5%) represented partial meniscectomies. The annual procedural rate, as a proportion of all reported cases, increased significantly from 2006 (0.3%) to 2016 (1.6%; p < 0.001), along with a significant increase in average patient age (44.3 ± 15.5 to 48.4 ± 14.5; p < 0.001). Specifically focusing on the meniscectomy cohort, average patient age significantly increased from 47.9 ± 15.1 to 50.7 ± 13.5 (p = 0.001). The overall incidence of complications was 2.0% (n = 1333), with major complications in 0.9% (n = 639) and minor complications in 1.0% (n = 701). Common complications included a return to the operating room (0.5%), deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis (0.4%), and superficial infection (0.2%). Operating time > 90 min, diabetes, steroid use, ASA class 2+, and dialysis-dependency were the predictors of overall complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Despite the publication of negative trials and new clinical practice guidelines, knee arthroscopy utilization and average patient age continue to increase. Given the high utilization, even low adverse event rates equate to substantial numbers of patients with minor and major complications. The NSQIP data show a gap in knowledge translation to clinical practice and highlight the need for improved clinical guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study; Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Knee arthroscopy; Knowledge translation; Trends; Utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31359100     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05638-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Treatment of Meniscal Tear: The More We Learn, the Less We Know.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Morgan H Jones
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  David T Felson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Can Administrative Data Be Used to Analyze Complications Following Total Joint Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Andrew James Clair; Ifeoma A Inneh; Richard Iorio; Keith R Berend; Craig J Della Valle; William L Healy; Vincent D Pelligrini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Biomechanics and Clinical Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy.

Authors:  Brian T Feeley; Brian C Lau
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Financial impact of third-party reimbursement due to changes in the definition of ICD-9 arthroscopy codes 29880, 29881, and 29877.

Authors:  Hussein Elkousy; Braiden Heaps; Steven Overturf; Mitzi S Laughlin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Procedural coding of spinal surgeries (CPT-4 versus ICD-9-CM) and decisions regarding standards: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tom Faciszewski; Ron Jensen; Richard L Berg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Incidental meniscal findings on knee MRI in middle-aged and elderly persons.

Authors:  Martin Englund; Ali Guermazi; Daniel Gale; David J Hunter; Piran Aliabadi; Margaret Clancy; David T Felson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Changes Within Clinical Practice After a Randomized Controlled Trial of Knee Arthroscopy for Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Nirav H Amin; Waqas Hussain; John Ryan; Shannon Morrison; Anthony Miniaci; Morgan H Jones
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-04-10

9.  Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA meniscus consensus.

Authors:  Ph Beaufils; R Becker; S Kopf; M Englund; R Verdonk; M Ollivier; R Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Nurmi; Juha Kalske; Anna Ikonen; Timo Järvelä; Tero A H Järvinen; Kari Kanto; Janne Karhunen; Jani Knifsund; Heikki Kröger; Tommi Kääriäinen; Janne Lehtinen; Jukka Nyrhinen; Juha Paloneva; Outi Päiväniemi; Marko Raivio; Janne Sahlman; Roope Sarvilinna; Sikri Tukiainen; Ville-Valtteri Välimäki; Ville Äärimaa; Pirjo Toivonen; Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cochrane in CORR : Arthroscopic Surgery for Degenerative Knee Disease (Osteoarthritis Including Degenerative Meniscal Tears).

Authors:  Michelle E Arakgi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.755

2. 

Authors:  Codie A Primeau; Trevor B Birmingham; Kristyn M Leitch; Kevin R Willits; Robert B Litchfield; Peter J Fowler; Jacquelyn D Marsh; Bert M Chesworth; Stephanie N Dixon; Dianne M Bryant; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 16.859

3.  Rates and Risk Factors of Revision Arthroscopy or Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty Within 1 Year Following Isolated Meniscectomy.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Anirudh K Gowd; Joseph N Liu; Nirav H Amin; Brian C Werner
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-24

4.  Trends and Complications of Arthroscopic-Assisted Tibial Plateau Fracture Fixation: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Alan G Shamrock; Zain Khazi; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Kyle R Duchman; Michael C Willey; Matthew D Karam; Matthew H Hogue; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-12

5.  Total knee replacement after high tibial osteotomy: time-to-event analysis and predictors.

Authors:  Codie A Primeau; Trevor B Birmingham; Kristyn M Leitch; Kevin R Willits; Robert B Litchfield; Peter J Fowler; Jacquelyn D Marsh; Bert M Chesworth; Stephanie N Dixon; Dianne M Bryant; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The Majority of Complaints About Orthopedic Sports Surgeons on Yelp Are Nonclinical.

Authors:  Jordan R Pollock; Jaymeson R Arthur; Jacob F Smith; Tala Mujahed; Joseph C Brinkman; M Lane Moore; Anikar Chhabra
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-18

7.  The rate of unnecessary interventions for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Marsh; Ryan Degen; Trevor B Birmingham; J Robert Giffin; Alan Getgood; Robert Litchfield; Kevin Willits; J Andrew McClure; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Partial Medial Meniscectomy Using Needle Arthroscopy and a Standardized Local Anesthetic Protocol.

Authors:  Matt Daggett; Tyler Tucker; Edoardo Monaco; Andrea Redler; Johnathan Pettegrew; Giorgio Bruni; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-05-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.