| Literature DB >> 31358761 |
Hui-Chao Ma1, Chen-Chen Zhao1, Gong-Jun Chen2, Yu-Bin Dong3.
Abstract
For seeking high enantiopurity, the previously reported thermal asymmetric catalysis is usually carried out at low temperature sometimes with limited yield, that is, the high enantiomeric excess (ee) usually at the cost of high yield. Thus, the achieving both high stereoselectivity and yield is an enormous challenge. We report herein two metal nanoparticle (M NP)-loaded and porphyrin-containing homochiral covalent organic framework (CCOF)-based composite catalysts, and their application in the thermally-driven asymmetric one-pot Henry and A3-coupling reactions. All the reactions are conducted at elevated temperatures with both excellent stereoselectivity and yield which resulted from the synergy of CCOF confinement effect and M NP catalytic activation. Notably, the needed thermal energy for the asymmetric reactions herein is derived from the photothermal conversion via porphyrin-based CCOF upon irradiation with visible light. Remarkably, the CCOF confinement effect can be effectively maintained up to 100 °C for the asymmetric one-pot Henry and A3-coupling reactions herein.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31358761 PMCID: PMC6662712 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11355-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Synthesis and characterization of 1–3. a Synthesis of 1–3. Single 2D layer and crystal packing patterns of 1. b Simulated and measured PXRD patterns of CCOF-CuTPP (1), Au@CCOF-CuTPP (2) and Pd@CCOF-CuTPP (3). TEM images (side and top views) of 1 were inserted. c, d TEM images of 2 and 3. Their SEM images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. e N2 adsorption isotherms of 1–3 at 77 K. f The pore widths of 1–3 are centered at 1.20, 0.71, and 0.85 nm, respectively
Optimization of the 2-catalyzed model one-pot asymmetric Henry reactiona
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | T(°C)/ | Yield (ee) %b |
| 1 | PhMe/EtOH | r.t./ | 98 (98) | |
| 2 | PhMe | r.t./ | 12 (95) | |
| 3 | EtOH | r.t./ | 8 (92) | |
| 4 | CH3CN | r.t./ | 14 (96) | |
| 5 | PhMe/EtOH | 58 °C/dark | 98 (91) | |
| 6 | PhMe/EtOH | r.t./dark | − (−) | |
| 7 | PhMe/EtOH | 58 °C/dark | 45 (94) | |
| 8 | PhMe/EtOH | r.t./ | 40 (92) | |
| 9 | Cu-TBrPP monomer | PhMe/EtOH | r.t./ | 43 (−) |
| 10 | Au NR (1 mol %) | PhMe/EtOH | 58 °C/dark | 97 (−) |
| 11 | Au@amorphous polymer (1 mol% Au %) | PhMe/EtOH | r.t./ | 73 (18) |
| 12 | PhMe/EtOH | r.t./solar light | 49 (96) | |
aReaction conditions: 2 (6.0 mg, 1 mol% Au equiv), benzyl alcohol (0.5 mmol), nitromethane (1.5 mmol), K2CO3 (1.5 mmol), PhMe/EtOH (1:1, 2 mL), 300 W xenon with a power density of 2.5 W cm−2 (λ > 400 nm), 10 h, in air
bYield was determined by the GC on HP-5 column, and ee was determined by HPLC with a Chiralcel OD-H column (90: 10 = n-hexane: isopropanol, 1.0 mL min−1, 230 nm) (Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). Because no one-pot tandem asymmetric Henry reaction starting from benzyl alcohol with nitromethane was reported so far, so only the comparison of 2 with reported asymmetric Henry reactions between benzaldehyde and nitromethane was shown in Supplementary Table 4
Scope of the 2-catalyzed one-pot asymmetric Henry reactionsa
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Ar-CH2OH | Yield (%)b | ee (%)b | TON |
| 1 | PhCH2OH | 98 | 98 ( | 98 |
| 2 | 4-Me-PhCH2OH | 97 | 98 ( | 97 |
| 3 | 3-Me-PhCH2OH | 98 | 95 ( | 98 |
| 4 | 4-MeO-PhCH2OH | 99 | 96 ( | 99 |
| 5 | 3-MeO-PhCH2OH | 99 | 94 ( | 99 |
| 6 | 4-NO2-PhCH2OH | 94 | 97 ( | 94 |
| 7 | 3-NO2-PhCH2OH | 95 | 95 ( | 95 |
| 8 | 4-F-PhCH2OH | 93 | 94 ( | 93 |
| 9 | 4-Cl-PhCH2OH | 95 | 98 ( | 95 |
| 10 | 9H-Fluorene-2-methanol | 6 | 97 ( | 6 |
| 11 | 9-Anthracenemethanol | 15 | 97 ( | 15 |
aReaction conditions: 2 (6 mg, 1 mol% Au equiv), aromatic alcohol (0.5 mmol), nitromethane (1.5 mmol), K2CO3 (1.5 mmol), PhMe/EtOH (1:1, 2 mL), room temperature, irradiated by 300 W xenon with a power density of 2.5 W cm−2 (λ > 400 nm), 10 h. Yields and ee are determined by GC and chiral HPLC analysis, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 19)
Optimization of the 3-catalyzed asymmetric A3-coupling reactiona
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Cat. | Solvent | T (°C)/ | Yield (ee) %b |
| 1 | r.t./ | 98 (96) | ||
| 2 | Toluene | r.t./ | 81 (89) | |
| 3 | EtOH | r.t./ | 58 (92) | |
| 4 | CH3CN | r.t./ | 70 (96) | |
| 5 | r.t./hv | 98 (96) | ||
| 6 | r.t./ | 90 (97) | ||
| 7 | 45 °C/dark | 90 (96) | ||
| 8 | r.t./dark | 21 (90) | ||
| 9 | r.t./ | 55 (92) | ||
| 10 | 45 °C/dark | 50 (87) | ||
| 11 | Cu-TBrPP | r.t./ | 46 (−) | |
| 12 | Pd NPs (5.0 mol %) | r.t./ | 17 (−) | |
| 13 | Pd NPs (5.0 mol %) | 45 °C/dark | 67 (−) | |
| 14 | r.t./sunlight | 45 (92) | ||
| 15 | Pd@amorphous polymer (2.1 mol% Pd %) | r.t./ | 78 (14) | |
aReaction conditions: 3 (6.0 mg, 2.8 mol Pd% equiv; 4.5 mg, 2.1 mol Pd% equiv; 3.0 mg, 1.4 mol Pd% equiv), benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol), phenylacetylene (0.5 mmol) and pyrrolidine (0.75 mmol), solvent (2 mL), 300 W xenon with a power density of 2.5 W cm−2 (λ > 400 nm), in nitrogen, 10 h
bYield was determined by the GC on HP-5 column, and ee was determined by HPLC with a Chiralcel OJ-H column (99: 1 = n-hexane: isopropanol, 1.0 mL min−1, 254 nm) (Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22). The comparison of 3 with reported asymmetric A3-coupling reaction was shown in Supplementary Table 5. 3 herein met excellent yield and stereoselectivity, mild reaction conditions and multiple reuse
Scope of the 3-catalyzed asymmetric A3-coupling reactionsa
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | R1 | R2 | R3 R4 | Yield (%)b | ee (%)b | TON |
| 1 | Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 98 | 96 ( | 46.7 |
| 2 | Ph− | 4-Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 92 | 96 ( | 43.8 |
| 3 | Ph− | 4-MeO−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 90 | 94 ( | 42.9 |
| 4 | Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 96 | 98 ( | 45.7 |
| 5 | Ph− | 4-F−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 97 | 98 ( | 46.2 |
| 6 | 4-Me−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 94 | 95 ( | 44.8 |
| 7 | 4-MeO−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 95 | 98 ( | 45.2 |
| 8 | 4-NO2−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 86 | 92 ( | 41.0 |
| 9 | 4-F−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 88 | 95 ( | 41.9 |
| 10 | 4-Me−Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 95 | 98 ( | 45.2 |
| 11 | 4-MeO−Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 95 | 98 ( | 45.2 |
| 12 | 4-NO2−Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 83 | 95 ( | 39.5 |
| 13 | 4-F−Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 84 | 95 ( | 40.0 |
| 14 | 4-Me−Ph− | 4−Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 86 | 93 ( | 41.0 |
| 15 | 4-MeO−Ph− | 4-Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 84 | 91 ( | 40.0 |
| 16 | 4-NO2−Ph− | 4-Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 91 | 94 ( | 43.3 |
| 17 | 4-F−Ph− | 4-Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 92 | 95 ( | 43.8 |
| 18 | Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)2O(CH2)2− | 68 | 90 ( | 32.4 |
| 19 | Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)5− | 95 | 95 ( | 45.2 |
| 20 | 3-Me−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 98 | 96 ( | 46.7 |
| 21 | 3-MeO−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 98 | 94 ( | 46.7 |
| 22 | 3-NO2−Ph− | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 86 | 95 ( | 41.0 |
| 23 | 3-Me−Ph− | 4-Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 87 | 91 ( | 41.4 |
| 24 | 3-Me−Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 95 | 95 ( | 45.2 |
| 25 | 3-NO2−Ph− | 4-Me−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 94 | 93 ( | 44.8 |
| 26 | 3-NO2−Ph− | 4-NO2−Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 86 | 94 ( | 41.0 |
| 27 | 9-anthral | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 37 | 87 ( | 17.6 |
| 28 | Fluorene-2-carboxal | Ph− | −(CH2)4− | 38 | 89 ( | 18.1 |
aReaction conditions: N2, 3 (4.5 mg, 2.1 mol% Pd), aromatic aldehyde (0.5 mmol), aromatic alkyne (0.5 mmol) and secondary amine (0.75 mmol), p-dioxane (2 mL), r.t., 300 W xenon with a power density of 2.5 W cm−2 (λ > 400 nm)
bYield and ee are determined by GC and chiral HPLC, respectively (Supplementary Figs. 30 and 31)
Fig. 2Photothermal examination of 1–3. a, b Photothermal behavior of 1 in PhMe/EtOH (1:1, 2 mL) and p-dioxane (2 mL), respectively. c Photothermal effect of 2 in PhMe/EtOH (1:1, 2 mL). d Photothermal effect of 3 in p-dioxane (2 mL). Visible light source: 300 W xenon lamp, λ > 400 nm with the intensity at 2.5 W cm−2. 4.9 and 3.4 mg of 1 are equivalent to the CCOF content in 6.0 mg of 2 and 4.5 mg of 3, respectively
2- and 3-catalyzed asymmetric reactions at different temperaturesa
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T(°C) | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 |
| Yield (%)b | 97 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
| ee (%) | 96 | 97 | 95 | 93 | 88 |
|
| |||||
| T(°C) | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 |
| Yield (%)b | 97 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
| ee (%)b | 97 | 96 | 96 | 92 | 86 |
aReactions are carried out under the optimized conditions except in dark by heating
bYield and ee are determined by GC and chiral HPLC, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 33)