Literature DB >> 31358580

Application of the Hartford Hospital Nomogram for Plazomicin Dosing Interval Selection in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

Tomefa E Asempa1, Joseph L Kuti1, Julie D Seroogy2, Allison S Komirenko2, David P Nicolau3.   

Abstract

Plazomicin is a new FDA-approved aminoglycoside antibiotic for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). In the product labeling, trough-based therapeutic drug management (TDM) is recommended for cUTI patients with renal impairment to prevent elevated trough concentrations associated with serum creatinine increases of ≥0.5 mg/dl above baseline. Herein, the utility of the Hartford nomogram to prevent plazomicin trough concentrations exceeding the TDM trough of 3 μg/ml and optimize the area under the curve (AUC) was assessed. The AUC reference range was defined as the 5th to 95th percentile AUC observed in the phase 3 cUTI trial (EPIC) (121 to 368 μg · h/ml). Observed 10-h plazomicin concentrations from patients in EPIC (n = 281) were plotted on the nomogram to determine an eligible dosing interval (every 24 h [q24h], q36h, q48h). Based on creatinine clearance (CLcr), a 15- or 10-mg/kg of body weight dose was simulated with the nomogram-derived interval. The nomogram recommended an extended interval (q36h and q48h) in 31% of patients. Compared with the 15 mg/kg q24h regimen received by patients with CLcr of ≥60 ml/min in EPIC, the nomogram-derived interval reduced the proportion of patients with troughs of ≥3 μg/ml (q36h, 27% versus 0%, P = 0.021; q48h, 57% versus 0%, P = 0.002) while significantly increasing the number of patients within the AUC range. Compared with the 8 to 12 mg/kg q24h regimen (received by patients with CLcr of >30 to 59 ml/min in EPIC), the nomogram-derived interval significantly reduced the proportion of troughs of ≥3μg/ml in the q48h cohort (72% versus 0%, P < 0.001) while maintaining a similar proportion of patients in the AUC range. Simulated application of the Hartford nomogram optimized plazomicin exposures in patients with cUTI while reducing troughs to <3 μg/ml.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aminoglycoside; dosing; nephrotoxicity; pharmacokinetics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31358580      PMCID: PMC6761540          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00148-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  24 in total

Review 1.  Once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides: review and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  C D Freeman; D P Nicolau; P P Belliveau; C H Nightingale
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials: treatment optimisation.

Authors:  Effie L Gillespie; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.481

3.  Once-Daily Plazomicin for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Daniel J Cloutier; Allison S Komirenko; Deborah S Cebrik; Kevin M Krause; Tiffany R Keepers; Lynn E Connolly; Loren G Miller; Ian Friedland; Jamie P Dwyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Comparison of the next-generation aminoglycoside plazomicin to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Christopher D Lawson; Sheryl Zelenitsky; Brandon Findlay; Frank Schweizer; Heather Adam; Andrew Walkty; Ethan Rubinstein; Alfred S Gin; Daryl J Hoban; Joseph P Lynch; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Risk factors for toxicity in elderly patients given aminoglycosides once daily.

Authors:  D L Paterson; J M Robson; M M Wagener
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Studies of risk factors for aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  C R Smith; R D Moore; P S Lietman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing: An update on current literature.

Authors:  Matthew S Stankowicz; Jad Ibrahim; Daniel L Brown
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 8.  Fluoroquinolone resistance: mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success.

Authors:  Liam S Redgrave; Sam B Sutton; Mark A Webber; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 17.079

9.  Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses for Plazomicin Using Pooled Data from Phase 1, 2, and 3 Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Michael Trang; Julie D Seroogy; Scott A Van Wart; Sujata M Bhavnani; Aryun Kim; Jacqueline A Gibbons; Paul G Ambrose; Christopher M Rubino
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of the Bactericidal Activity of Plazomicin and Comparators against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  M Thwaites; D Hall; D Shinabarger; A W Serio; K M Krause; A Marra; C Pillar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew Chou; Elwyn Welch; Andrew Hunter; Barbara W Trautner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 2.  Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology.

Authors:  Maxwell J Lasko; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Plazomicin: a new aminoglycoside in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Justin A Clark; David S Burgess
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.