Judith R Davidson 1 , Ciara Dickson 2 , Han Han 3 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend that chronic insomnia be treated first with cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), and that hypnotic medication be considered only when CBT-I is unsuccessful. Although there is evidence of CBT-I's efficacy in research studies, systematic reviews of its effects in primary care are lacking. AIM: To review the effects on sleep outcomes of CBT-I delivered in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of articles published worldwide. METHOD: Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for articles published from January 1987 until August 2018 that reported sleep results and on the use of CBT-I in general primary care settings. Two researchers independently assessed and then reached agreement on the included studies and the extracted data. Cohen's d was used to measure effects on sleep diary outcomes and the Insomnia Severity Index. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were included. Medium-to-large positive effects on self-reported sleep were found for CBT-I provided over 4-6 sessions. Improvements were generally well maintained for 3-12 months post-treatment. Studies of interventions in which the format or content veered substantially from conventional CBT-I were less conclusive. In only three studies was CBT-I delivered by a GP; usually, it was provided by nurses, psychologists, nurse practitioners, social workers, or counsellors. Six studies included advice on withdrawal from hypnotics. CONCLUSION: The findings support the effectiveness of multicomponent CBT-I in general primary care. Future studies should use standard sleep measures, examine daytime symptoms, and investigate the impact of hypnotic tapering interventions delivered in conjunction with CBT-I. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend that chronic insomnia be treated first with cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), and that hypnotic medication be considered only when CBT-I is unsuccessful. Although there is evidence of CBT-I's efficacy in research studies, systematic reviews of its effects in primary care are lacking. AIM: To review the effects on sleep outcomes of CBT-I delivered in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of articles published worldwide. METHOD: Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for articles published from January 1987 until August 2018 that reported sleep results and on the use of CBT-I in general primary care settings. Two researchers independently assessed and then reached agreement on the included studies and the extracted data. Cohen's d was used to measure effects on sleep diary outcomes and the Insomnia Severity Index. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were included. Medium-to-large positive effects on self-reported sleep were found for CBT-I provided over 4-6 sessions. Improvements were generally well maintained for 3-12 months post-treatment. Studies of interventions in which the format or content veered substantially from conventional CBT-I were less conclusive. In only three studies was CBT-I delivered by a GP; usually, it was provided by nurses, psychologists, nurse practitioners, social workers, or counsellors. Six studies included advice on withdrawal from hypnotics. CONCLUSION: The findings support the effectiveness of multicomponent CBT-I in general primary care. Future studies should use standard sleep measures, examine daytime symptoms, and investigate the impact of hypnotic tapering interventions delivered in conjunction with CBT-I. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.
Entities: Disease
Keywords:
chronic insomnia; cognitive behavioural therapy; family practice; primary health care; sleep disorders; sleep initiation and maintenance disorders
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2019
PMID： 31358494 PMCID： PMC6663098 DOI： 10.3399/bjgp19X705065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Gen Pract ISSN： 0960-1643 Impact factor: 5.386