Gerard Lacey1, Jiang Zhou2, Xuchun Li2, Christine Craven3, Chris Gush4. 1. School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: gjlacey@tcd.ie. 2. School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 3. Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, UK. 4. Department of Health and Social Care, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor quality handwashing contributes to the spread of nosocomial infections. We investigate the impact of automatic video auditing (AVA) with feedback on the quality and quantity of handwashing in a hospital setting. METHODS: AVA systems were mounted over all handwash sinks in a surgical unit. Phase 1 established baseline handwashing quality and quantity. Phase 2 examined the impact of real-time performance feedback, and phase 3 examined the incremental impact of weekly team performance reports. Phase 4 remeasured the baseline without feedback. RESULTS: A total of 3,606 handwash events were audited. During phase 2 and 3, compliance with the World Health Organization technique improved from 15.7%-46% (P < .0001), and the average number of handwash events per patient per day increased from 0.91-2.25 (P < .0001). Performance returned to baseline in phase 4. CONCLUSIONS: AVA with real-time feedback significantly improved the quality and quantity of handwashing. The combination of AVA with electronic monitoring will allow simultaneous auditing of hand hygiene quantity and quality. The impact of cognitive offloading onto the technology may have contributed to the return to baseline at the end of the study, and suggests further research is required in this area.
BACKGROUND: Poor quality handwashing contributes to the spread of nosocomial infections. We investigate the impact of automatic video auditing (AVA) with feedback on the quality and quantity of handwashing in a hospital setting. METHODS: AVA systems were mounted over all handwash sinks in a surgical unit. Phase 1 established baseline handwashing quality and quantity. Phase 2 examined the impact of real-time performance feedback, and phase 3 examined the incremental impact of weekly team performance reports. Phase 4 remeasured the baseline without feedback. RESULTS: A total of 3,606 handwash events were audited. During phase 2 and 3, compliance with the World Health Organization technique improved from 15.7%-46% (P < .0001), and the average number of handwash events per patient per day increased from 0.91-2.25 (P < .0001). Performance returned to baseline in phase 4. CONCLUSIONS: AVA with real-time feedback significantly improved the quality and quantity of handwashing. The combination of AVA with electronic monitoring will allow simultaneous auditing of hand hygiene quantity and quality. The impact of cognitive offloading onto the technology may have contributed to the return to baseline at the end of the study, and suggests further research is required in this area.
Authors: Malvika Sharma; Carl Savage; Monika Nair; Ingrid Larsson; Petra Svedberg; Jens M Nygren Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Q Xu; Y Liu; D Cepulis; A Jerde; R A Sheppard; W Reichle; L Scott; L Oppy; G Stevenson; S Bishop; S P Clifford; P Liu; M Kong; J Huang Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 8.944
Authors: Qian Xu; Yang Liu; Darius Cepulis; Ann Jerde; Rachel A Sheppard; Kaitlin Tretter; Leah Oppy; Gina Stevenson; Sarah Bishop; Sean P Clifford; Peng Liu; Maiying Kong; Jiapeng Huang Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.918