| Literature DB >> 31358009 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: South Korea is one of the countries with a very low percentage of active nurses among the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Although the number of nurses has increased steadily, the number of active nurses has not increased more than expected due to continued turnover.Entities:
Keywords: Job satisfaction; Survival; Turnover; Working environment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31358009 PMCID: PMC6664533 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-019-0397-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Resour Health ISSN: 1478-4491
Individual factors and educational factors of newly graduated nurses (n = 652)
| Variables | Categories | |
|---|---|---|
| Individual factor | ||
| Graduation year | 2008 | 174 (26.7) |
| 2009 | 187 (28.7) | |
| 2010 | 291 (44.6) | |
| Age at graduation [min–max] | 24.8 ± 2.6 [22–46] | |
| Gender | Female | 590 (90.5) |
| Male | 62 (9.5) | |
| Marital status | No | 622 (95.4) |
| Yes | 30 (4.6) | |
| Educational level (% of college or university) | Father | 218 (33.4) |
| Mother | 110 (16.9) | |
| Family income (monthly) | < 2 million won | 152 (23.3) |
| 2–5 million won | 389 (59.7) | |
| ≥ 5 million won | 111 (17.0) | |
| Education factor | ||
| Degree | College | 416 (63.8) |
| University | 236 (36.2) | |
| Admission type | New entrance | 610 (93.6) |
| Transfer | 42 (6.4) | |
| Reasons for choosing a major | Employment prospect | 381 (58.4) |
| Aptitude | 139 (21.3) | |
| Others | 132 (20.2) | |
| Organizational factor | ||
| Size | Small | 164 (25.2) |
| Medium | 153 (23.5) | |
| Large | 335 (51.4) | |
| Location | Capital (Seoul) | 210 (32.2) |
| Metropolitan | 183 (28.1) | |
| Non-metropolitan | 259 (39.7) | |
| Moving direction for employment | To the major cities | 274 (42.0) |
| In the same area | 289 (44.3) | |
| To the minor cities | 89 (13.7) | |
| Union in the hospital | Yes | 342 (52.5) |
| No | 310 (47.5) | |
| Shift | Yes | 387 (59.4) |
| No | 265 (40.6) | |
| Salary (monthly) | < 2.0 million won | 228 (35.0) |
| 2–2.5 million won | 227 (34.8) | |
| 2.5–3.0 million won | 152 (23.3) | |
| ≥ 3.0 million won | 45 (6.9) | |
| Job satisfaction (score 1–5) | Salary | 3.21 ± 0.90 |
| Stability of employment | 3.82 ± 0.81 | |
| Working environment | 3.25 ± 0.96 | |
| Working hours | 3.01 ± 1.00 | |
| Career prospect | 3.26 ± 0.87 | |
| Relationship | 3.41 ± 0.92 | |
| Welfare benefit | 3.36 ± 0.93 | |
| Performance appraisal system | 3.10 ± 0.80 | |
| Social esteem | 3.59 ± 0.82 | |
| Autonomy and authority | 3.20 ± 0.90 | |
| Overall organization | 3.16 ± 0.90 | |
| Overall profession | 3.28 ± 0.81 | |
Fig. 1Turnover curve of newly graduated nurses
Fig. 2Turnover curve of newly graduated nurses by graduation year
Factors affecting the turnover of newly graduated nurses by univariate Cox regression analysis
| Variables | Categories | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Upper | ||||
| Individual factors | |||||
| Graduation year (ref: 2008) | 2009 | 1.21 | 0.267 | 0.87 | 1.68 |
| 2010 | 1.52** | < 0.001 | 1.14 | 2.03 | |
| Age at graduation | 1.04* | 0.022 | 1.01 | 1.08 | |
| Gender (ref: male) | Female | 0.73 | 0.078 | 0.51 | 1.04 |
| Marital status (ref: no) | Yes | 1.24 | 0.397 | 0.75 | 2.06 |
| Educational level of father (ref: less high school) | Father | 1.04 | 0.751 | 0.82 | 1.33 |
| Mother | 1.11 | 0.498 | 0.82 | 1.50 | |
| Family income (ref: < 2 million won monthly) | 2–5 million won | 0.88 | 0.352 | 0.67 | 1.15 |
| ≥5 million won | 0.80 | 0.236 | 0.56 | 1.16 | |
| Education factors | |||||
| Degree (ref: college) | University | 0.77* | 0.036 | 0.60 | 0.98 |
| Admission type (ref: new entrance) | Transfer | 1.39 | 0.129 | 0.91 | 2.13 |
| Selection reason (ref: employment prospect) | Aptitude | 0.94 | 0.688 | 0.70 | 1.26 |
| Others | 1.04 | 0.813 | 0.77 | 1.39 | |
| Hospital factors | |||||
| Location (ref: capital) | Metropolitan | 1.32 | 0.071 | 0.98 | 1.77 |
| Non-metropolitan | 1.27 | 0.091 | 0.96 | 1.69 | |
| Moving direction for working (ref: to the major cities) | In the same area | 1.21 | 0.138 | 0.94 | 1.55 |
| To the minor cities | 1.36 | 0.082 | 0.96 | 1.91 | |
| Union (ref: no) | Yes | 0.48** | < 0.001 | 0.38 | 0.61 |
| Shift (ref: no) | Yes | 1.30 | 0.096 | 0.95 | 1.77 |
| Size (ref: small) | Medium | 0.66** | 0.008 | 0.49 | 0.90 |
| Large | 0.51** | < 0.001 | 0.39 | 0.67 | |
| Salary (ref: < 2.0 million won) | 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.68** | 0.004 | 0.53 | 0.88 |
| 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.34** | < 0.001 | 0.23 | 0.48 | |
| ≥ 3.0 million won | 0.47** | 0.004 | 0.28 | 0.79 | |
| Size and salary (ref: small, < 2.0 million won) | Small, 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.73 | 0.140 | 0.48 | 1.11 |
| Small, 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.39 | 0.188 | 0.09 | 1.59 | |
| Small, ≥ 3.0 million won | 1.63 | 0.629 | 0.23 | 11.78 | |
| Medium, < 2.0 million won | 0.81 | 0.333 | 0.52 | 1.25 | |
| Medium, 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.58* | 0.012 | 0.38 | 0.89 | |
| Medium, 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.27** | 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.59 | |
| Medium, ≥ 3.0 million won1 | – | – | .- | .- | |
| Large, < 2.0 million won | 0.69 | 0.082 | 0.46 | 1.05 | |
| Large, 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.48** | < 0.001 | 0.32 | 0.72 | |
| Large, 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.28** | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.43 | |
| Large, ≥ 3.0 million won | 0.42** | 0.003 | 0.24 | 0.74 | |
| Job dissatisfaction (ref: satisfaction or neutral) | Salary | 1.25 | 0.102 | 0.96 | 1.63 |
| Stability of employment | 3.01** | < 0.001 | 2.04 | 4.46 | |
| Working environment | 1.62** | < 0.001 | 1.25 | 2.08 | |
| Working hours | 1.39** | < 0.001 | 1.09 | 1.76 | |
| Career prospect | 1.55** | < 0.001 | 1.17 | 2.05 | |
| Relationship | 1.69** | < 0.001 | 1.26 | 2.28 | |
| Welfare benefit | 1.16 | 0.338 | 0.86 | 1.55 | |
| Performance appraisal | 1.05 | 0.737 | 0.79 | 1.40 | |
| Social esteem | 1.55* | 0.026 | 1.05 | 2.27 | |
| Autonomy and authority | 1.47** | < 0.001 | 1.11 | 1.93 | |
| Overall organization | 2.74** | < 0.001 | 2.15 | 3.50 | |
| Overall profession | 2.09** | < 0.001 | 1.59 | 2.75 | |
*p < 0.050, **p < 0.010, 1No turnover cases
Factors affecting the turnover of newly graduated nurses by multivariate Cox regression analysis
| Variables | Categories | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Upper | ||||
| Graduation year (ref: 2008) | 2009 | 1.37 | 0.069 | 0.94 | 1.85 |
| 2010 | 1.75** | < 0.001 | 1.17 | 2.10 | |
| Gender (ref: male) | Female | 0.66* | 0.022 | 0.47 | 0.95 |
| Size and salary (ref: small, < 2.0 million won) | Small, 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.77 | 0.229 | 0.50 | 1.18 |
| Small, 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.49 | 0.327 | 0.12 | 2.03 | |
| Small, ≥ 3.0 million won | 0.45 | 0.435 | 0.06 | 3.33 | |
| Medium, < 2.0 million won | 0.78 | 0.267 | 0.50 | 1.21 | |
| Medium, 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.62* | 0.029 | 0.40 | 0.95 | |
| Medium, 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.24** | < 0.001 | 0.11 | 0.53 | |
| Medium, ≥ 3.0 million won1 | – | – | – | – | |
| Large, < 2.0 million won | 0.68 | 0.077 | 0.45 | 1.04 | |
| Large, 2.0–2.5 million won | 0.49** | 0.001 | 0.32 | 0.74 | |
| Large, 2.5–3.0 million won | 0.37** | < 0.001 | 0.23 | 0.59 | |
| Large, ≥ 3.0 million won | 0.63 | 0.130 | 0.35 | 1.14 | |
| Union (ref: no) | Yes | 0.60** | < 0.001 | 0.47 | 0.77 |
| Dissatisfaction | Organization | 2.37** | < 0.001 | 1.76 | 3.20 |
| (ref: satisfaction or neutral) | Profession | 1.48* | 0.021 | 1.06 | 2.06 |
*p < 0.050, **p < 0.010, 1No turnover cases