| Literature DB >> 31357556 |
Ha-Kyung Kim1, In-Hwan Cho1, Eun-A Hwang1, Yong-Jae Kim2, Baik-Ho Kim3,4.
Abstract
In the Korean Peninsula's southern estuaries, the distributive characteristics of epilithic diatoms and the important environmental factors predicting species occurrence were examined. The collection of diatoms and measurements of water quality and land-use were performed every May between 2009 and 2016, with no influence from the Asian monsoon and snow. Throughout the study, 564 diatoms were classified with first and second dominant species of Nitzschia inconspicua and N. perminuta. Based on diatom appearance and standing crops, the 512 sampling stations were divided into four groups by cluster analysis, and two regions, namely the West and East Sea. Geographically, G1, G2, G3, and G4 were located in the East Sea, Southeast Sea, West Sea, and Southwest Sea, respectively. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) results indicated that environmental factors, such as turbidity, electric conductivity (EC), and total phosphorus (TP), significantly influenced the distribution of epilithic diatoms. A random forest model showed that major environmental factors influencing the diatom species appearance included EC, salinity, turbidity, and total nitrogen. This study demonstrated that the spatial distribution of epilithic diatoms in the southern estuaries of the Korean Peninsula was determined by several factors, including a geographically higher tidal current-driven turbidity increase and higher industrial or anthropogenic nutrient-loading.Entities:
Keywords: CCA; benthic diatom; cluster analysis; diatom indices; estuary; random forest
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31357556 PMCID: PMC6696093 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Collection sites of water and epilithic diatoms in the downstream or estuary of Korean peninsula between 2009 and 2016.
| Locations | Open Stream * | Closed Stream ** | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| East sea | 124 | 11 | 135 |
| South sea | 149 | 81 | 230 |
| West sea | 23 | 124 | 147 |
* Open streams have no dams to harvest the flowing water or to keep out the sea. ** Closed streams have one or several dams to harvest the flowing water or to keep out the sea.
Figure 1A map showing the 512 sampling stations for the water and diatom sampling in Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016.
Dominant species and number of species in Korean peninsula estuaries between 2009 and 2016.
| Locations | Dominant Species (%) | Subdominant Species (%) | No. Species |
|---|---|---|---|
| East sea | 354 | ||
| South sea | 457 | ||
| West sea | 346 | ||
| Total | 566 |
Figure 2(Left) Dendrogram illustrating the sites affinity by cluster analysis with diatom abundance and appearance. Each color in figures presents four groups: G1 (red), G2 (green), G3 (blue), and G4 (pink). (Right) Geographical distribution patterns of the sampling site in four clusters: (a) G1; (b) G2; (c) G3; and (d) G4.
Figure 3Relative abundances (%) of major epilithic diatom species observed in four groups in Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016. The dominant species comprise those over the 0.5% of the total abundance in each group.
Figure 4Biological factors in four groups of Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016. Small letter (a–d) indicate Tukey’s post hoc test with the Bonferroni test: (a) abundances (1000 cells/cm2); (b) NOS, number of species; (c) DI, species dominant index; (d) H’, Shannon–Weaver’s diversity index; (e) J, richness; and (f) e, evenness.
Good indicator species and the values (%) of the epilithic diatom communities in Korean peninsula estuaries between 2009 and 2016. Groups were divided by cluster analysis with diatom abundance and appearance.
| Indicator Species | CODE | G1 | G2 | G3 | G4 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CYSI | 39 | 5 | 5 | 2 | <0.001 |
| FRRV | 30 | 0 | 5 | 0 | <0.001 | |
| FRVG | 28 | 0 | 5 | 0 | <0.001 | |
| FRCO | 27 | 4 | 0 | 0 | <0.001 | |
|
| RESI | 27 | 1 | 2 | 0 | <0.001 |
|
| STIN | 0 | 0 | 46 | 0 | <0.001 |
|
| CYAT | 0 | 1 | 39 | 6 | <0.001 |
|
| STHA | 0 | 0 | 38 | 3 | <0.001 |
|
| NICN | 0 | 1 | 35 | 0 | <0.001 |
|
| NAAT | 1 | 0 | 34 | 0 | <0.001 |
|
| NAVE | 5 | 0 | 33 | 2 | <0.001 |
|
| NAHA | 1 | 0 | 32 | 0 | <0.001 |
|
| NAAC | 1 | 1 | 25 | 1 | <0.001 |
|
| BAPA | 1 | 2 | 6 | 37 | <0.001 |
|
| NACA | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | <0.001 |
|
| NICA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 25 | <0.001 |
Figure 5Environmental variables in four groups of Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016. Small letters (a–c) indicate Tukey’s post hoc test with the Bonferroni test: (a) WT, Water temperature (°C); (b) pH; (c) Salinity (ppt); (d) conductivity, electric conductivity (1000 μS/cm); (e) Turbidity; (f) DO, Dissolve oxygen (mg/L); (g) BOD, Biochemical oxygen demand (mg/L); (h) Total Nitrogen (mg/L); (i) Total Phosphorus (mg/L); (j) Chl-a, Chlorophyll-a (mg/cm2); and (k) AFDM, Ash-free dry-matter (mg/cm2).
Relationship between indicator species and environmental variables in each diatom group in Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016. Groups were divided by cluster analysis with diatom abundance and appearance. CODE (name of diatom) cited from Table 3.
| CODE | WT | pH | SAL | EC | TURB | DO | BOD | TN | TP | CHL | AFDM | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYSI | −0.306 ** | −0.130 ** | −0.212 ** | −0.270 ** | −0.319 ** | 0.274 ** | −0.137 ** | −0.225 ** | −0.194 ** | 0.064 | −0.160 ** | 1 |
| FRRV | −0.225 ** | −0.021 | −0.175 ** | −0.185 ** | −0.071 | 0.162 ** | −0.039 | −0.018 | −0.035 | −0.061 | −0.054 | 1 |
| FRVG | −0.217 ** | −0.013 | −0.196 ** | −0.235 ** | −0.097 * | 0.159 ** | −0.016 | −0.022 | −0.084 | −0.088 * | −0.105 * | 1 |
| FRCO | −0.149 ** | −0.074 | −0.106 * | −0.056 | −0.164 ** | 0.199 ** | −0.031 | −0.152 ** | −0.078 | 0.074 | 0.127 ** | 1 |
| RESI | −0.106 * | −0.074 | −0.143 ** | −0.210 ** | −0.145 ** | 0.183 ** | −0.130 ** | −0.114 ** | −0.124 ** | −0.007 | −0.094 * | 1 |
| STIN | 0.018 | 0.160 ** | −0.005 | 0.053 | 0.196 ** | −0.062 | −0.018 | 0.170 ** | 0.183 ** | −0.203 ** | 0.141 ** | 3 |
| CYAT | 0.130 ** | 0.211 ** | 0.019 | 0.059 | 0.319 ** | −0.226 ** | −0.068 | 0.188 ** | 0.162 ** | −0.275 ** | 0.230 ** | 3 |
| STHA | 0.009 | 0.174 ** | −0.033 | 0.025 | 0.261 ** | −0.123 ** | 0.073 | 0.208 ** | 0.198 ** | −0.214 ** | 0.164 ** | 3 |
| NICN | 0.039 | 0.055 | 0.123 ** | 0.147 ** | 0.082 | −0.005 | −0.014 | −0.032 | 0.039 | −0.086 | 0.053 | 3 |
| NAAT | −0.018 | 0.158 ** | −0.095 * | −0.049 | 0.189 ** | −0.179 ** | −0.075 | 0.187 ** | 0.217 ** | −0.202 ** | 0.157 ** | 3 |
| NAVE | −0.023 | 0.089 * | −0.157 ** | −0.082 | 0.151 ** | −0.016 | 0.042 | 0.172 ** | 0.109 * | −0.185 ** | 0.075 | 3 |
| NAHA | 0.002 | 0.088 * | 0.007 | 0.068 | 0.147 ** | −0.091 * | −0.016 | 0.126 ** | 0.158 ** | −0.187 ** | 0.147 ** | 3 |
| NAAC | −0.042 | 0.100 * | 0.025 | −0.015 | 0.154 ** | −0.021 | −0.022 | −0.018 | 0.112 * | −0.011 | 0.066 | 3 |
| BAPA | 0.087 | 0.042 | −0.024 | 0.060 | 0.137 ** | −0.042 | 0.144 ** | 0.024 | 0.005 | 0.061 | 0.093 * | 4 |
| NACA | 0.065 | 0.062 | −0.102 * | −0.074 | 0.196 ** | −0.072 | 0.135 ** | 0.107 * | 0.079 | 0.055 | 0.044 | 4 |
| NICA | 0.090 * | 0.006 | 0.058 | 0.073 | 0.106 * | −0.160 ** | 0.101 * | 0.084 | 0.074 | 0.077 | 0.070 | 4 |
WT, water temperature; EC, electric conductivity; TURB, turbidity; DO, dissolved oxygen; BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; CHL, chlorophyll-a; AFDM, ash-free-dry matter; G, group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
List of epilithic diatoms with the first and second most important variables predicting species appearance by a random forest model in Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016. Ar, accuracy rate; AUC, area under the curve; GI, group indicator.
| Species | Ar | AUC | Important Variables | GI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 2nd | ||||
| 0.88 | 0.99 | TN (100) | TURB (94) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | EC (75) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.98 | EC (100) | TURB (61) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | TN (100) | EC (90) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | TP (100) | TN (93) | ||
| 0.85 | 0.94 | TN (100) | SAL (97) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.99 | WT (100) | TP (96) | ||
| 0.84 | 0.96 | DO (100) | TURB (99) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (88) | ||
| 0.94 | 1.00 | SAL (100) | WT (84) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.96 | EC (100) | TURB (97) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | pH (100) | TN (92) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.95 | EC (100) | TP (51) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.96 | TURB (100) | EC (95) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | TN (100) | EC (97) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (54) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.98 | EC (100) | TP (65) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | BOD (100) | TURB (78) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.96 | BOD (100) | TP (48) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.99 | EC (100) | SAL (71) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | EC (100) | SAL (65) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.97 | TP (100) | pH (42) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.98 | EC (100) | pH (85) | ||
| 0.85 | 0.99 | BOD (100) | EC (92) | 4 | |
| 0.86 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (76) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.97 | TN (100) | SAL (99) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | EC (100) | TURB (77) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | pH (100) | EC (52) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.98 | TURB (100) | WT (40) | 3 | |
| 0.83 | 0.96 | TURB (100) | TP (77) | ||
| 0.84 | 0.98 | TP (100) | WT (80) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.99 | TURB (100) | TP (58) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | EC (100) | SAL (74) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.97 | EC (100) | SAL (80) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.96 | EC (100) | TURB (97) | 1 | |
| 0.91 | 0.96 | TURB (100) | TP (59) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.98 | EC (100) | SAL (87) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | BOD (88) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | EC (75) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.98 | EC (100) | SAL (99) | ||
| 0.95 | 1.00 | EC (100) | TN (94) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.96 | WT (100) | TURB (92) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.95 | EC (100) | WT (59) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.96 | SAL (100) | TN (48) | 1 | |
| 0.98 | 0.99 | TURB (100) | TP (40) | ||
| 0.89 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | TURB (74) | 1 | |
| 0.90 | 0.97 | TURB (100) | WT (76) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (83) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | DO (95) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.98 | WT (100) | SAL (85) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | WT (68) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (63) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.97 | WT (100) | SAL (51) | 1 | |
| 0.94 | 0.99 | EC (100) | BOD (73) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.98 | WT (100) | BOD (91) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.96 | EC (100) | DO (25) | ||
| 0.82 | 0.98 | EC (100) | SAL (72) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | WT (100) | TP (78) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.98 | TN (100) | SAL (66) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | TP (100) | SAL (99) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.96 | pH (100) | BOD (81) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (86) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.99 | EC (100) | DO (84) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | EC (68) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | TURB (100) | TP (69) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.98 | EC (100) | TP (92) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.98 | EC (100) | BOD (81) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.98 | TURB (100) | WT (71) | 3 | |
| 0.96 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | BOD (71) | 3 | |
| 0.98 | 1.00 | TURB (100) | SAL (99) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | pH (100) | SAL (67) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | DO (97) | 4 | |
| 0.92 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (84) | ||
| 0.91 | 1.00 | SAL (100) | EC (93) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.98 | TN (100) | TP (58) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | EC (74) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.96 | EC (100) | SAL (61) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.97 | EC (100) | WT (70) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.97 | EC (100) | SAL (48) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.98 | EC (100) | TURB (74) | ||
| 0.82 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (77) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.98 | EC (100) | SAL (91) | 3 | |
| 0.93 | 1.00 | EC (100) | SAL (86) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.96 | EC (100) | SAL (71) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.98 | TP (100) | SAL (98) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.99 | EC (100) | SAL (84) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (54) | ||
| 0.95 | 1.00 | EC (100) | SAL (87) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.98 | WT (100) | pH (40) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | WT (100) | BOD (87) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.97 | TN (100) | SAL (84) | ||
| 0.89 | 0.98 | TN (100) | pH (54) | ||
| 0.84 | 0.98 | EC (100) | SAL (87) | ||
| 0.91 | 1.00 | BOD (100) | EC (66) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.97 | TURB (100) | TP (73) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.98 | TP (100) | WT (88) | ||
| 0.89 | 0.98 | TN (100) | SAL (99) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | TP (100) | pH (60) | ||
| 0.93 | 0.97 | EC (100) | SAL (83) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.98 | TN (100) | TP (86) | ||
| 0.85 | 0.95 | SAL (100) | TP (68) | ||
| 0.93 | 1.00 | SAL (100) | EC (89) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (58) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | EC (49) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | TP (100) | EC (56) | 3 | |
| 0.95 | 0.98 | EC (100) | SAL (73) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | EC (56) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.98 | DO (100) | WT (94) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.97 | WT (100) | SAL (96) | ||
| 0.89 | 0.99 | DO (100) | BOD (85) | 4 | |
| 0.87 | 0.99 | BOD (100) | TP (75) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.99 | EC (100) | SAL (72) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | EC (100) | SAL (54) | 3 | |
| 0.82 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | TP (58) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.98 | SAL (100) | pH (92) | ||
| 0.88 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | DO (54) | ||
| 0.89 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (91) | ||
| 0.87 | 0.96 | TN (100) | BOD (75) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.97 | EC (100) | TN (91) | ||
| 0.89 | 0.98 | WT (100) | TP (68) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.99 | WT (100) | EC (77) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | EC (100) | BOD (90) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (95) | ||
| 0.84 | 0.98 | BOD (100) | SAL (44) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | EC (100) | SAL (89) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.98 | TURB (100) | pH (98) | ||
| 0.95 | 0.99 | TN (100) | DO (92) | ||
| 0.92 | 0.97 | EC (100) | TURB (45) | 1 | |
| 0.92 | 0.97 | TURB (100) | TP (21) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.98 | pH (100) | TURB (63) | 3 | |
| 0.94 | 0.98 | pH (100) | TP (64) | 3 | |
| 0.90 | 0.97 | EC (100) | SAL (78) | ||
| 0.83 | 0.97 | SAL (100) | EC (82) | ||
| 0.94 | 0.99 | TP (100) | WT (65) | ||
| 0.96 | 0.99 | TP (100) | TURB (90) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | BOD (79) | ||
| 0.90 | 0.99 | SAL (100) | EC (95) | ||
| 0.86 | 0.96 | SAL (100) | EC (83) | ||
| 0.91 | 0.99 | EC (100) | TURB (91) | ||
WT, water temperature; SAL, salinity; DO, dissolved oxygen; BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; TURB, turbidity; EC, electric conductivity; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
Figure 6Relative importance (%) of predictable variables using a random forest model in four diatom communities defined by cluster analysis based on diatom abundance in Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016: (a) G1; (b) G2; (c) G3; and (d) G4. WT, water temperature; SAL, salinity; EC, electric conductivity; DO, dissolved oxygen; BOD, biochemical oxygen demand; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus.
Figure 7Relative diatom indices and biological water healthy of each epilithic diatom community in the Korean estuaries between 2009 and 2016. Small letters (a–c) indicate Tukey’s post hoc test with the Bonferroni test: (a) TDI, Trophic Diatom Index [51]; (b) DAIpo, Diatom Assemblage Index of Pollution [21]; (c) ANN (%), (Achnanthes/(Achnanthes + Navicula)) × 100 [52]; (d) MD (%), (motile diatom/total diatom abundance) × 100 [53]; and (e) NGO (%), (Number of Gomphonema species/Number of total diatom species) × 100 [52].