Kuralay K Atageldiyeva1, Rita Nemr2, Akram Echtay3, Eddie Racoubian4, Sameh Sarray5, Wassim Y Almawi6. 1. School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, LAU Medical Center - Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon. 3. Department of Adult Endocrinology and Diabetes, Rafic Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon. 4. St. Marc Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. 5. College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain; Faculty of Sciences, El-Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia. 6. School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan; Faculty of Sciences, El-Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia. Electronic address: wassim.almawi@outlook.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An association between Apolipoprotein E (Apo E) alleles and genotypes and diabetic nephropathy (DN) was suggested, but with inconsistent results. We tested the relationship between serum lipids, Apo E alleles and genotypes with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and DN pathogenesis. METHODS: Study subjects comprised 1389 normoglycemic controls, and 1422 T2DM patients, of whom 825 were normoalbuminuric (DWN), and 597 presented with nephropathy (DN). RESULTS: Significantly lower Apo ε2, and higher Apo ε4 allele frequencies was seen among T2DM patients than controls. Significantly higher frequency of ε3/ε4, and lower frequencies of ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3, and ε4/ε4 carriers was seen among T2DM cases. Apo ε2-carrying individuals were more frequently found in controls than in patients, while significantly higher frequency of ε4-carrying genotypes was seen in T2DM cases. Significantly higher ε2, and lower ε3 allele frequencies were noted for DN group compared to DWN group. Significantly higher frequency of ε2-containing ε2/ε3 and ε2/ε4, and lower frequencies of ε3/ε3 carriers was seen among DN cases. Apo ε3/ε3 was associated with higher total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in DN patients, and significantly higher triglyceride levels were seen in ε2/ε3-carrying DN patients. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the association of Apo ε3-containing ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3, and ε3/ε4, and Apo ε2-containing ε2/ε4 with DN, after controlling for key covariates. CONCLUSION: The results of this case-control study provide evidence that the ε2 and ε3 alleles of APOE modify lipid profile, and constitute independent risk factors of DN in type 2 diabetes. The molecular mechanisms underlying this risk is discussed.
BACKGROUND: An association between Apolipoprotein E (Apo E) alleles and genotypes and diabetic nephropathy (DN) was suggested, but with inconsistent results. We tested the relationship between serum lipids, Apo E alleles and genotypes with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and DN pathogenesis. METHODS: Study subjects comprised 1389 normoglycemic controls, and 1422 T2DM patients, of whom 825 were normoalbuminuric (DWN), and 597 presented with nephropathy (DN). RESULTS: Significantly lower Apo ε2, and higher Apo ε4 allele frequencies was seen among T2DM patients than controls. Significantly higher frequency of ε3/ε4, and lower frequencies of ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3, and ε4/ε4 carriers was seen among T2DM cases. Apo ε2-carrying individuals were more frequently found in controls than in patients, while significantly higher frequency of ε4-carrying genotypes was seen in T2DM cases. Significantly higher ε2, and lower ε3 allele frequencies were noted for DN group compared to DWN group. Significantly higher frequency of ε2-containing ε2/ε3 and ε2/ε4, and lower frequencies of ε3/ε3 carriers was seen among DN cases. Apo ε3/ε3 was associated with higher total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in DN patients, and significantly higher triglyceride levels were seen in ε2/ε3-carrying DN patients. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the association of Apo ε3-containing ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3, and ε3/ε4, and Apo ε2-containing ε2/ε4 with DN, after controlling for key covariates. CONCLUSION: The results of this case-control study provide evidence that the ε2 and ε3 alleles of APOE modify lipid profile, and constitute independent risk factors of DN in type 2 diabetes. The molecular mechanisms underlying this risk is discussed.