Literature DB >> 31356889

Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends in challenging cases (1995-2018).

Adnan Orhan1, Kemal Ozerkan2, Isil Kasapoglu2, Gokhan Ocakoglu3, Bilge Cetinkaya Demir2, Tuba Gunaydin2, Gurkan Uncu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of challenging factors on laparoscopic hysterectomy trends within twenty-four years. POPULATION AND
METHOD: This was a trend analysis study of 7558 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications between 1995-2018 in Bursa Uludag University Hospital, Turkey. A trend analysis of obesity, previous laparotomy (≥3) and uterine specimen weight (≥500g) was applied for abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) rates in this period. The primary outcome was laparoscopic hysterectomy trends throughout the years. We measured the effect of obesity, previous laparotomies and large uterus on TLH trends as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: The ratio of TLHs to all hysterectomies was 2.4% in 1995 and 44.7% in 2018 which increased 33 times higher over 24 years. The percentage of obese patients in TLH cases increased from 1% to 37%, the rate of patients who had three or more previous laparotomy in TLH cases increased from 0% to 32.2%, and the percentage of patients who had more than 500g uterus specimen in laparoscopic hysterectomy cases increased from 0% to 32.8%.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends are increasing in challenging cases. Obesity, previous surgeries, and large uteruses are no longer a limiting factor for laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy trends; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Obesity; Previous abdominal surgery; Uterine weight

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31356889     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod        ISSN: 2468-7847


  6 in total

1.  A Dose-Response Relationship Study of Prophylactic Nalbuphine to Reduce Pain During the Awakening Period in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study.

Authors:  Min Wang; Dongyue Wang; Jingzhi Zuo; Tianyu Liu; Zheng Niu; Juan Xie; Dunyi Qi
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.162

2.  Spinal versus general anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Berna Kaya Uğur; Lütfiye Pirbudak; Ebru Öztürk; Özcan Balat; Mete Gürol Uğur
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10-02

3.  Italian survey on the residents' surgical level in gynecology and obstetrics.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Andrea Rosati; Giulio Sozzi; Giulia Armano; Stefano Cianci; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Berretta; Tiziana Frusca
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-09-16

4.  A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors for Small Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Moona Arabkhazaeli; Julia Keltz; Ruth Eisenberg; Mark Levie; Holly Yettaw Luts
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Choosing a Surgical Access Point for Hysterectomy: A Paradigm Shift Over a 10-Year Span.

Authors:  Florian Ebner; Niko de Gregorio; Christiane Lato; Valerie Ohly; Wolfgang Janni; Jennifer Spohrs; Lucia Jerg-Bretzke; Steffen Walter
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-25

6.  The Prevalence, Incidence, Indications and Outcomes of Peripartum Hysterectomy in Kazakhstan: Data from Unified Nationwide Electronic Healthcare System 2014-2018.

Authors:  Gulzhanat Aimagambetova; Yesbolat Sakko; Arnur Gusmanov; Alpamys Issanov; Talshyn Ukybassova; Gauri Bapayeva; Aizada Marat; Aiymzhan Nurpeissova; Abduzhappar Gaipov
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-02-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.