Literature DB >> 31356772

Definitions, measurement and indicator selection for quality of care in abortion.

Blair G Darney1, Nathalie Kapp2, Kathryn Andersen2, Sarah E Baum3, Kelly Blanchard3, Caitlin Gerdts3, Dominic Montagu4, Nirali M Chakraborty5, Bill Powell2.   

Abstract

Little consensus exists about how to measure quality of care in abortion. Our purpose is to (a) provide common language for healthcare quality definitions, frameworks and measurement; (b) synthesize literature about quality measurement in abortion; and (c) present criteria for quality metric development. Quality includes effectiveness, patient centeredness, timeliness, efficiency and equity of care. Information about structure, process and outcomes of care is used to measure quality. We do not have good evidence about expected population-level health and behavioral outcomes associated with improving abortion service quality. Abortion patients overwhelmingly report high satisfaction with services, but it is not clear if their satisfaction indicates high-quality care. Guidance exists for quality metric selection; measures must focus on priority topics, be scientifically sound and be feasible. Technical quality standards and clinical guidelines exist, but we lack a standard set of quality metrics. Partners in the Abortion Service Quality Initiative (https://asq-initiative.org/) are collaborating to develop the first-ever global standard for measuring abortion service quality in low- and middle-income countries, both in and out of health care facilities. Standardized and validated quality metrics would move our field forward and contribute to quality improvement activities and, ultimately, to improved health outcomes for women and families. IMPLICATIONS: We define quality of health care, synthesize the evidence about quality of care in abortion and advocate for standardized and validated quality metrics to improve health outcomes for women.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Indicators; Metrics; Quality of care

Year:  2019        PMID: 31356772     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Perspectives on high-quality interpersonal care among people obtaining abortions in Argentina.

Authors:  Chiara Bercu; Sofía Filippa; Ana Maria Ramirez; Anna Katz; Belén Grosso; Ruth Zurbriggen; Sandra Vázquez; Sarah E Baum
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.355

2.  Evaluation of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Contraceptive Care in US Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Blair G Darney; R Lorie Jacob; Megan Hoopes; Maria I Rodriguez; Brigit Hatch; Miguel Marino; Anna Templeton; Jee Oakley; Erika K Cottrell
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  Toward a Standard Measure of Abortion Service Quality-A Stakeholder First Approach.

Authors:  Nirali M Chakraborty; Erin Pearson; Caitlin Gerdts; Sarah E Baum; Bill Powell; Dominic Montagu
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-04

4.  Quality of care in abortion in the era of technological and medical advancements and self-care.

Authors:  Ankita Shukla; Lucía Vazquez-Quesada; Isabel Vieitez; Rajib Acharya; Saumya RamaRao
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.355

5.  Medical abortion offered in pharmacy versus clinic-based settings.

Authors:  Maria I Rodriguez; Alison Edelman; Alyssa Hersh; Pragya Gartoulla; Jillian Henderson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.