Literature DB >> 31356374

Comparison of neostigmine vs. sugammadex for recovery of muscle function after neuromuscular block by means of diaphragm ultrasonography in microlaryngeal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Iacopo Cappellini1, Daniele Ostento, Beatrice Loriga, Lorenzo Tofani, Angelo R De Gaudio, Chiara Adembri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative residual curarisation (PORC) is a risk directly related to the use of neuromuscular blocking agents during surgical procedures. Acceleromyography is distressing for conscious patients when assessing PORC. Diaphragm ultrasonography could be a valid alternative.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to achieve a 28% lower incidence of PORC in patients who, after rocuronium administration, received neostigmine or sugammadex at 30 min after surgery. To assess PORC, diaphragm ultrasonography was used, and thickening fractioning [the difference of thickness at the end of inspiration (TEI) and at the end of expiration (TEE), normalised for TEE (TEI - TEE/TEE)] was measured. PORC was defined as thickening fractioning of 0.36 or less. The secondary object was the comparison, in the two treatment groups, of the return to baseline thickening fractioning at 30 min after surgery (ΔTF30).
DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, single-centre study.
SETTING: University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy. PATIENTS: Patients of American Society Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2, 18 to 80 years, receiving rocuronium during microlaryngeal surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: At the end of surgery participants were randomised to receive neostigmine (NEO group) or sugammadex (SUG group) as the reversal drug. Thickening fractioning and ΔTF30 were evaluated at baseline and at 0, 10 and 30 min after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TEE and TEI at each time point.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients with similar demographic characteristics were enrolled. An association between lack of recovery (thickening fractioning ≤0.36) and drug treatment was only observed at 0 min (SUG vs. NEO, P < 0.05). Concerning ΔTF, at 30 min more patients in the SUG group returned to baseline than those in the NEO group (P < 0.001), after adjusting for side (P = 0.52), baseline thickening fractioning (P < 0.0001) and time of measurement (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: We found an early (0 min) but not long-lasting (30 min) association between diaphragm failure and treatment allocation; a full recovery in baseline diaphragm function was observed only in patients receiving sugammadex. We cannot exclude that further differences have not been found due to interpatients variability in assessing diaphragm contractility by ultrasonography. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Identifier: 2013-004787-62, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02698969.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31356374     DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Sugammadex in awakening from general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adriano Anzai; Armelin Utino; Giuliano Tosello; Haroldo Katayama; Ighor Alexander Zamuner Spir; Luca Schiliró Tristão; Mary Martins Nery; Mauricio Anhesini; Osvaldo Silvestrini Tiezzi; Patricia Rodrigues Naufal Spir; Pericles Otani; Wanderley Marques Bernado
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.712

2.  Economic impact of improving patient safety using Sugammadex for routine reversal of neuromuscular blockade in Spain.

Authors:  J Martinez-Ubieto; C Aragón-Benedí; J de Pedro; L Cea-Calvo; A Morell; Y Jiang; S Cedillo; P Ramírez-Boix; A M Pascual-Bellosta
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Comparison of the effects of neostigmine and sugammadex on postoperative residual curarization and postoperative pulmonary complications by means of diaphragm and lung ultrasonography: a study protocol for prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yu-Guan Zhang; Ying Chen; Yue-Lun Zhang; Jie Yi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Analgesic and Anesthetic Efficacy of Rocuronium/Sugammadex in Otorhinolaryngologic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  En-Bo Wu; Chao-Ting Hung; Sheng-Dean Luo; Shao-Chun Wu; Tsung-Yang Lee; Jo-Chi Chin; Peng-Neng Tsai; Johnson Chia-Shen Yang
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 5.  Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: What Does the Recent Evidence Demonstrate?

Authors:  Guy Cammu
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2020-03-27

6.  A Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Assisted System to Predict Weaning from Ventilator Immediately after Lung Resection Surgery.

Authors:  Ying-Jen Chang; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Li-Kai Wang; Chia-Hung Yu; Chao-Kun Chen; Hung-Tze Tay; Jhi-Joung Wang; Chung-Feng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Diaphragm ultrasound to evaluate the antagonistic effect of sugammadex on rocuronium after liver surgery in patients with different liver Child-Pugh grades: study protocol for a prospective, double-blind, non-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Shujun Sun; Yan Sun; Rui Chen; Chunlin Yao; Haifa Xia; Xiangdong Chen; Yun Lin; Shanglong Yao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.