Literature DB >> 31355885

Development and Validation of a Dynamic Risk Prediction Model to Forecast Psychosis Onset in Patients at Clinical High Risk.

Erich Studerus1, Katharina Beck1,2, Paolo Fusar-Poli3,4,5,6, Anita Riecher-Rössler1.   

Abstract

The prediction of outcomes in patients at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) almost exclusively relies on static data obtained at a single snapshot in time (ie, baseline data). Although the CHR-P symptoms are intrinsically evolving over time, available prediction models cannot be dynamically updated to reflect these changes. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a dynamic risk prediction model (joint model) and to implement this model in a user-friendly online risk calculator. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the prognostic performance of extended dynamic risk prediction models and to compare static with dynamic prediction. One hundred ninety-six CHR-P patients were recruited as part of the "Basel Früherkennung von Psychosen" (FePsy) study. Psychopathology and transition to psychosis was assessed at regular intervals for up to 5 years using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded (BPRS-E). Various specifications of joint models were compared with regard to their cross-validated prognostic performance. We developed and internally validated a joint model that predicts psychosis onset from BPRS-E disorganization and years of education at baseline and BPRS-E positive symptoms during the follow-up with good prognostic performance. The model was implemented as online risk calculator (http://www.fepsy.ch/DPRP/). The use of extended joint models slightly increased the prognostic accuracy compared to basic joint models, and dynamic models showed a higher prognostic accuracy than static models. Our results confirm that extended joint modeling could improve the prediction of psychosis in CHR-P patients. We implemented the first online risk calculator that can dynamically update psychosis risk prediction.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical high risk; joint model; prediction; psychosis; risk calculator; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31355885      PMCID: PMC7442327          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  41 in total

1.  A Case of a College Student Presenting With Mild Mental Health Problems.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Cathy Davies; Ilaria Bonoldi
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Validating the Predictive Accuracy of the NAPLS-2 Psychosis Risk Calculator in a Clinical High-Risk Sample From the SHARP (Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis) Program.

Authors:  TianHong Zhang; HuiJun Li; YingYing Tang; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Martha E Shenton; Matcheri S Keshavan; William S Stone; Robert W McCarley; Larry J Seidman; JiJun Wang
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  International consensus study of antipsychotic dosing.

Authors:  David M Gardner; Andrea L Murphy; Heather O'Donnell; Franca Centorrino; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 4.  Moving From Static to Dynamic Models of the Onset of Mental Disorder: A Review.

Authors:  Barnaby Nelson; Patrick D McGorry; Marieke Wichers; Johanna T W Wigman; Jessica A Hartmann
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

5.  Short clinically-based prediction model to forecast transition to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk state.

Authors:  Magdalena Kotlicka-Antczak; Michał S Karbownik; Konrad Stawiski; Agnieszka Pawełczyk; Natalia Żurner; Tomasz Pawełczyk; Dominik Strzelecki; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 5.361

6.  An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon; Changhong Yu; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Barbara A Cornblatt; Robert Heinssen; Clark D Jeffries; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 7.  Predicting the onset of psychosis in patients at clinical high risk: practical guide to probabilistic prognostic reasoning.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; F Schultze-Lutter
Journal:  Evid Based Ment Health       Date:  2016-02

8.  Deconstructing Pretest Risk Enrichment to Optimize Prediction of Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Grazia Rutigliano; Daniel Stahl; André Schmidt; Valentina Ramella-Cravaro; Shetty Hitesh; Philip McGuire
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  Performance of joint modelling of time-to-event data with time-dependent predictors: an assessment based on transition to psychosis data.

Authors:  Hok Pan Yuen; Andrew Mackinnon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Transdiagnostic Risk Calculator for the Automatic Detection of Individuals at Risk and the Prediction of Psychosis: Second Replication in an Independent National Health Service Trust.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Nomi Werbeloff; Grazia Rutigliano; Dominic Oliver; Cathy Davies; Daniel Stahl; Philip McGuire; David Osborn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 9.306

View more
  7 in total

1.  Translating RDoC to Real-World Impact in Developmental Psychopathology: A Neurodevelopmental Framework for Application of Mental Health Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Leigha A MacNeill; Norrina B Allen; Roshaye B Poleon; Teresa Vargas; K Juston Osborne; Katherine S F Damme; Deanna M Barch; Sheila Krogh-Jespersen; Ashley N Nielsen; Elizabeth S Norton; Christopher D Smyser; Cynthia E Rogers; Joan L Luby; Vijay A Mittal; Lauren S Wakschlag
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2021-12-07

2.  Clinical outcomes in brief psychotic episodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  U Provenzani; G Salazar de Pablo; M Arribas; F Pillmann; P Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 7.818

3.  Using Natural Language Processing on Electronic Health Records to Enhance Detection and Prediction of Psychosis Risk.

Authors:  Jessica Irving; Rashmi Patel; Dominic Oliver; Craig Colling; Megan Pritchard; Matthew Broadbent; Helen Baldwin; Daniel Stahl; Robert Stewart; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Dominic Oliver; Yamiko Msosa; Craig Colling; Giulia Spada; Łukasz Roguski; Amos Folarin; Robert Stewart; Angus Roberts; Richard J B Dobson; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Real-world digital implementation of the Psychosis Polyrisk Score (PPS): A pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Dominic Oliver; Giulia Spada; Amir Englund; Edward Chesney; Joaquim Radua; Abraham Reichenberg; Rudolf Uher; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Early Intervention Services for First Episode of Psychosis in South London and the Maudsley (SLaM): 20 Years of Care and Research for Young People.

Authors:  Paolo Fusar-Poli; Serena Lai; Marta Di Forti; Eduardo Iacoponi; Graham Thornicroft; Philip McGuire; Sameer Jauhar
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Developing and Validating an Individualized Clinical Prediction Model to Forecast Psychotic Recurrence in Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorders: Electronic Health Record Cohort Study.

Authors:  Stefano Damiani; Grazia Rutigliano; Teresa Fazia; Sergio Merlino; Carlo Berzuini; Luisa Bernardinelli; Pierluigi Politi; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 7.348

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.