| Literature DB >> 31355192 |
Hao Xu1,2,3,4, Xiaoyi Wang1,2, Guoliang Chi1,2,3, Bingchang Tan1,2,3, Jianwu Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
In order to control lepidopteran and coleopteran insects, the genes expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal proteins have been transferred into crops. Ecological risk assessments of the transgenic plants have included impacts on non-target entomophagous insects, such as parasitoid wasps. Herbivore-induced plant volatiles are considered to be important defensive traits of plants because these compounds play as an important role in recruitment of natural enemies. Here, we evaluated induced volatile emissions of maize seedlings of two Bt cultivars (5422Bt1, event Bt11 and 5422CBCL, event Mon810), and their nearly isogenic non-Bt line 5422. We damaged plants mechanically and then applied with the regurgitant of Spodoptera litura (F.) caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), or treated the plants with the plant hormone jasmonic acid (JA), to trigger similar defensive responses of plants. Compared to the non-Bt isoline 5422 and the Bt maize 5422CBCL, the other Bt maize 5422Bt1 released more (3E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT) when they were all treated by artificial wounds and caterpillar regurgitant; and released more linalool, DMNT and (E)-β-farnesene when applied with JA solution. As a result, the total volatile emission of the 5422Bt1 was highest. However, the difference in volatile emission did not affect the attractiveness of the Bt maize plants to the egg parasitoid Trichogramma ostriniae Pang et Chen (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) compared to the nearly isogenic non-Bt plants. The variability of induced volatiles of maize cultivars derived from conventional breeding programs and transgenic methods are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: egg parasitoids; genetically modified organism; leaf-chewing insects; plant-insect interactions; tritrophic interactions
Year: 2019 PMID: 31355192 PMCID: PMC6635655 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
The attractiveness of the Bt maize and regular maize plants to the egg parasitoid.
| Intact plants compared to an empty arm (blank control) | 5422 | 55.3 | 59.4 | 0.275 |
| Empty arm | 44.7 | |||
| 5422Bt1 | 56.1 | 64 | 0.172 | |
| Empty arm | 43.9 | |||
| 5422CBCL | 52.8 | 56.3 | 0.348 | |
| Empty arm | 47.2 | |||
| Regurgitant treated plants compared to an empty arm (blank control) | 5422 | 71.4 | 76.6 | |
| Empty arm | 28.6 | |||
| 5422Bt1 | 68.6 | 79.7 | ||
| Empty arm | 31.4 | |||
| 5422CBCL | 76.6 | 73.4 | ||
| Empty arm | 23.4 | |||
| JA treated plants compared to an empty arm (blank control) | 5422 | 79.5 | 68.8 | |
| Empty arm | 20.5 | |||
| 5422Bt1 | 72.9 | 75 | ||
| Empty arm | 27.1 | |||
| 5422CBCL | 71.7 | 71.9 | ||
| Empty arm | 28.3 | |||
| Comparisons between intact plants of different cultivars | 5422 | 55.6 | 56.3 | 0.524 |
| 5422Bt1 | 44.4 | |||
| 5422 | 55.0 | 62.5 | 0.11 | |
| 5422CBCL | 45.0 | |||
| 5422Bt1 | 52.6 | 59.4 | 0.696 | |
| 5422CBCL | 47.4 | |||
| Comparisons between regurgitant treated plants of different cultivars | 5422 | 55.6 | 84.4 | 0.787 |
| 5422Bt1 | 44.4 | |||
| 5422 | 53.7 | 84.4 | 0.155 | |
| 5422CBCL | 46.3 | |||
| 5422Bt1 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 1 | |
| 5422CBCL | 50.0 | |||
| Comparisons between JA treated plants of different cultivars | 5422 | 51.9 | 84.4 | 0.773 |
| 5422Bt1 | 48.1 | |||
| 5422 | 51.7 | 90.6 | 0.661 | |
| 5422CBCL | 48.3 | |||
| 5422Bt1 | 48.3 | 90.6 | 0.617 | |
| 5422CBCL | 51.7 |
The bold P values indicate significant statistical differences (P < 0.05) between treatments.
Figure 1Volatile emissions of the Bt maize and the non-Bt maize lines under different treatments. (A) The chromatographs of maize seedlings induced by JA solution. The compounds were 1 = (Z)-3-hexen-1-yl acetate; 2 = (E)-β-ocimene; 3 = linalool; 4 = (3E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT); 5 = phenethyl acetate; 6 = indole; 7 = methyl anthranilate; 8 = geranyl acetate; 9 = (E)-β-caryophyllene; 10 = (E)-α-bergamotene; 11 = (E)-β-farnesene; 12 = (E)-nerolidol. (B) The volatile emissions (N = 4) of the three cultivars when the plants were mechanically damaged and then treated by caterpillar regurgitant. (C) The volatile emissions (N = 4) of the three cultivars when the plants were treated by JA. A one-way ANOVA with the Holm-Sidak post hoc analysis was used for pairwise comparisons, and letters on the bar figures indicated statistical differences (P < 0.05). The details of statistical results and data were presented in Supplementary Files 1, 2, respectively.