| Literature DB >> 31354833 |
Henry F Aritonang1, Harry Koleangan1, Audy D Wuntu1.
Abstract
Plant-mediated synthesis of nanomaterials has been increasingly gaining popularity due to its eco-friendly nature and cost-effectiveness. In the present study, we synthesized silver (Ag) nanoparticles using aqueous extracts of fresh leaves of Impatiens balsamina and Lantana camara medicinal plants as bioreducing agents. This method allowed the synthesis of nanoparticles, which was confirmed by ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). UV-Vis spectra and visual observation showed that the color of the fresh leaf extracts of L. camara and I. balsamina turned into grayish brown and brownish yellow, respectively, after treatment with Ag precursors. In addition, TEM analysis confirmed that AgNO3 solutions for all concentrations produced Ag nanoparticles and their average size was less than 24 nm. Moreover, aqueous leaf extracts of I. balsamina and L. camara were separately tested for their antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Escherichia coli bacteria. The results showed that the bacterial growth was inhibited by the extracts containing Ag nanoparticles. Statistical calculation performed using the Tukey test showed that zones of inhibition for the two bacteria produced by the aqueous leaf extracts of L. camara containing 3 mM and 5 mM Ag precursors were not significantly different from that by ciprofloxacin as positive control. On the contrary, there was significant difference between the zone of inhibition for E. coli by ciprofloxacin and that by the extracts of I. balsamina leaves containing 3 mM and 5 mM Ag precursors. A similar result was observed on the zone of inhibition for S. aureus by the extracts of I. balsamina leaves containing 3 mM Ag precursor. It was shown that the aqueous extracts of fresh L. camara leaves containing Ag nanoparticles were comparable to ciprofloxacin in inhibiting bacterial growth.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31354833 PMCID: PMC6636566 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8642303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Figure 1Plants: (a) Impatiens balsamina; (b) Lantana camara.
Figure 2Aqueous extract from fresh leaves of (a) I. balsamina and (b) L. camara. Before (A1 and B1) and after (A2 and B2) the addition of AgNO3 solution.
Figure 3UV-Vis absorbance spectrum of Ag nanoparticles as a function of AgNO3 concentration in aqueous extracts of fresh leaves of (a) I. balsamina and (b) L. camara, respectively.
Peak wavelength and absorbance of Ag nanoparticles in aqueous extracts of fresh leaves of I. balsamina and L. camara.
| Concentration (mM) | Wavelength (nm) | Absorbance |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 1 | 452 | 0.894 |
| 2 | 452 | 0.937 |
| 3 | 451 | 1.109 |
| 4 | 441 | 1.285 |
| 5 | 455 | 1.736 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| 1 | 420 | 0.667 |
| 2 | 438 | 1.277 |
| 3 | 438 | 1.691 |
| 4 | 433 | 2.059 |
| 5 | 450 | 3.386 |
Figure 4TEM images of Ag nanoparticles in the aqueous extract of (a) I. balsamina and (b) L. camara and their particle-size distribution at different molar concentrations of AgNO3: 1 mM (A1 and B1) and 5 mM (A2 and B2).
Size of Ag nanoparticles produced from various concentrations of AgNO3 using aqueous extracts of fresh leaves of I. balsamina and L. camara.
| Concentration of AgNO3 solution (mM) | Ag nanoparticle size (nm) | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 12 ± 2 | 3.2 ± 1.2 |
| 2 | 15 ± 2.1 | 4 ± 1 |
| 3 | 17 ± 2.2 | 6 ± 1.1 |
| 4 | 19 ± 2.5 | 10 ± 1.3 |
| 5 | 20 ± 3.3 | 12 ± 2.1 |
Figure 5Antibacterial activity of Ag nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous leaf extracts of I.balsamina (a) and L. camara (b) against Gram-positive S. aureus (A1 and B1) and Gram-negative E. coli bacteria (A2 and B2).
Antibacterial activity of Ag nanoparticles synthesized using various concentrations of AgNO3 precursors and aqueous extracts of fresh leaves of I. balsamina and L. camara.
| Plants | [AgNO3] (mM)/replication | Zone of inhibition (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Positive control |
| Positive control | |||
|
| 3 | 1 | 11.3 | 18.2 | 14.3 | 17.8 |
| 2 | 12.3 | 21.2 | 7.8 | 20.7 | ||
| 3 | 9.5 | 19.7 | 8.5 | 20 | ||
| Average |
|
|
|
| ||
| 5 | 1 | 20 | 19.7 | 10.3 | 19.6 | |
| 2 | 10.5 | 19.8 | 7.3 | 19.4 | ||
| 3 | 11 | 19.6 | 9 | 19.5 | ||
| Average |
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||
|
| 3 | 1 | 12.8 | 18.1 | 20.5 | 18 |
| 2 | 14.5 | 20.9 | 15.3 | 21 | ||
| 3 | 14.5 | 20 | 17.3 | 19.8 | ||
| Average |
|
|
|
| ||
| 5 | 1 | 13 | 19.6 | 15.3 | 19.4 | |
| 2 | 20 | 19.8 | 16.5 | 19.7 | ||
| 3 | 14.3 | 19.8 | 14.5 | 19.8 | ||
| Average |
|
|
|
| ||
Positive control = ciprofloxacin; values indicated with “a” are significantly different from values indicated with “b”; values indicated with “c” are significantly different from values indicated with “d”; values indicated with “e” are significantly different from values indicated with “f”.