| Literature DB >> 31354691 |
Carolina F Cubillos1,2,3, Adrián Paredes4,5, Carolina Yáñez6, Jenifer Palma7, Esteban Severino1, Drina Vejar1,3, Mario Grágeda2, Cristina Dorador1,3,8.
Abstract
Microbial life inhabiting hypersaline environments belong to a limited group of extremophile or extremotolerant taxa. Natural or artificial hypersaline environments are not limited to high concentrations of NaCl, and under such conditions, specific adaptation mechanisms are necessary to permit microbial survival and growth. Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile include three large salars (salt flats) which globally, represent the largest lithium reserves, and are commonly referred to as the Lithium Triangle Zone. To date, a large amount of information has been generated regarding chemical, geological, meteorological and economical perspectives of these salars. However, there is a remarkable lack of information regarding the biology of these unique environments. Here, we report the presence of two bacterial strains (isolates LIBR002 and LIBR003) from one of the most hypersaline lithium-dominated man-made environments (total salinity 556 g/L; 11.7 M LiCl) reported to date. Both isolates were classified to the Bacillus genera, but displayed differences in 16S rRNA gene and fatty acid profiles. Our results also revealed that the isolates are lithium-tolerant and that they are phylogenetically differentiated from those Bacillus associated with high NaCl concentration environments, and form a new clade from the Lithium Triangle Zone. To determine osmoadaptation strategies in these microorganisms, both isolates were characterized using morphological, metabolic and physiological attributes. We suggest that our characterization of bacterial isolates from a highly lithium-enriched environment has revealed that even at such extreme salinities with high concentrations of chaotropic solutes, scope for microbial life exists. These conditions have previously been considered to limit the development of life, and our work extends the window of life beyond high concentrations of MgCl2, as previously reported, to LiCl. Our results can be used to further the understanding of salt tolerance, most especially for LiCl-dominated brines, and likely have value as models for the understanding of putative extra-terrestrial (e.g., Martian) life.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus; Lithium Triangle Zone; bacteria; halophiles; lithium-tolerance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31354691 PMCID: PMC6637823 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Salares belonging to the Lithium Triangle Zone, their characteristics and key studies (Hurlbert and Chang, 1983; Garret, 2004; An et al., 2012; Lorenzini, 2012; Nacif and Lacabana, 2015; Perez-Fernandez et al., 2016; Haferburg et al., 2017; Rubin et al., 2017; Cubillos et al., 2018; Martínez et al., 2018).
FIGURE 2Phylogenetic tree using sequence of 16S rRNA gene (∼1400 bp) of Bacillus related-NaCl. The strains obtained in this study are shown in dark red, lithium-tolerant in pink, slightly halotolerant in olive, moderately halotolerant in black, slightly halophile in teal and moderately halophiles in green color. Access numbers are shown in parentheses and Sulfobacillus acidophilus was used as outgroup (blue).
FIGURE 3Phylogenetic tree using sequence of 16S rRNA gene of Bacillus isolated from the Lithium Triangle Zone. The strains obtained in this study are shown in dark red and the access number is shown in parentheses. The values of bootstrap >50% are shown (1,000 interactions). Exiguobacterium aestuarii was used as outgroup.
FIGURE 4Visualization of Bacillus sp., strains from lithium brines by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). (A) LIBR002 strain; (B) LIBR003 strain.
FIGURE 5Microbial growth of isolates LIBR002 and LIBR003 indifferent LiCl and NaCl concentrations. Values are mean ± standard error of the mean of experiments (SEM). The trend lines are represented as solid lines.
Fatty acid composition of species of Bacillus of lithium brines.
| 17.08 | C14:0 | Myristic acid | Tetradecanoic acid | 1.36 ± 1.3 | ND |
| 18.48 | C14:1 (C9) | Myristoleic acid | 16.87 ± 6.7 | 15.36 ± 3.2 | |
| 19.12 | C15:0 | Pentadecanoic acid | Pentadecylic acid | ND | 1.98 ± 0.7 |
| 21.04 | C16:0 | Palmitic acid | Hexadecanoic acid | 2.34 ± 1.6 | 4.45 ± 1.7 |
| 22.05 | C16:1 (C9) | Palmitoleic acid | 6.05 ± 2.0 | 2.52 ± 0.9 | |
| 23.04 | C17:0 | Margaric acid | Heptadecanoic acid | ND | 3.53 ± 1.3 |
| 26.35 | C18:1 (C9) | Oleic acid | 1.72 ± 0.5 | ND | |