| Literature DB >> 31354607 |
Jowy Tani1,2,3, Hsing-Yu Weng1,4, Hung-Ju Chen1, Tsui-San Chang4, Jia-Ying Sung1,3,4, Cindy Shin-Yi Lin5,6.
Abstract
Introduction: Abuse of nitrous oxide (N2O) has an unusually high lifetime prevalence in developed countries and represents a serious concern worldwide. Myeloneuropathy following the inhalant abuse is commonly attributed to the disturbance of vitamin B12 metabolism, with severe motor deficits are often noted. The present study aims to elucidate its underlying pathophysiology.Entities:
Keywords: inhalant; myeloneuropathy; nerve excitability test; nitrous oxide; vitamin B12
Year: 2019 PMID: 31354607 PMCID: PMC6633399 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1This flowchart depicts the recruitment and the subjects involved in the final data analysis. Eighteen patients were categorized into the N2O abuse group and vitamin B12 deficiency group. MRC, Medical Research Council; NIS-LL, Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NCS, nerve conduction study; QST, quantitative sensory test.
Patients clinical, MRI, and laboratory profiles.
| Sex: male/female (number) | 5/3 | 4/2 |
| Age (year) | 26.75 ± 2.59 | 60.5 ± 8.74 |
| Duration of N2O abuse (months) | 17.13 ± 7.23 | – |
| MRC sum score | 51.50 ± 2.87 | 59.67 ± 0.33 |
| NIS-LL | 27.00 ± 5.83 | 10.00 ± 4.47 |
| Vitamin B12 level (pg/ml) | 236.33 ± 52.80 | 111.50 ± 15.46 |
| Homocysteine level (μmol/l) | 44.84 ± 12.00 | 51.68 ± 25.52 |
| Weakness (%) | 37.50 | 0 |
| Upper limbs MRC sum score | 27.50 ± 1.55 | 30.00 ± 0.00 |
| Abnormal pain/temperature sensation (%) | 75.00 | 16.67 |
| Abnormal vibratory sensation/proprioception (%) | 37.50 | 0 |
| Hypo/hyperreflexia (%) | 62.50 | 0 |
| Ataxia (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Weakness (%) | 75.00 | 33.33 |
| Lower limbs MRC sum score | 24.00 ± 2.20 | 29.67 ± 0.33 |
| Abnormal pain/temperature sensation (%) | 100.00 | 66.67 |
| Abnormal vibratory sensation/proprioception (%) | 50.00 | 66.67 |
| Hypo/hyperreflexia (%) | 75.00 | 50.00 |
| Ataxia (%) | 12.50 | 0 |
| Autonomic dysfunction (%) | 25.00 | 33.33 |
| T2 hyperintensity on whole spine MRI (%) | 87.50 | 50.00 |
| Median nerve (m/s) | 47.19 ± 2.83 | 50.59 ± 2.58 |
| Ulnar nerve (m/s) | 46.31 ± 4.31 | 52.50 ± 2.80 |
| Tibial nerve (m/s) | 17.00 ± 6.46 | 33.33 ± 6.74 |
| Peroneal nerve (m/s) | 15.69 ± 6.71 | 34.25 ± 6.90 |
| Median nerve (%) | 87.50 | 40.00 |
| Ulnar nerve (%) | 87.50 | 100.00 |
| Tibial nerve (%) | 62.50 | 20.00 |
| Peroneal nerve (%) | 62.50 | 20.00 |
| Median nerve (m/s) | 47.38 ± 2.64 | 51.92 ± 5.75 |
| Ulnar nerve (m/s) | 49.13 ± 2.09 | 51.11 ± 4.69 |
| Sural nerve (m/s) | 24.06 ± 9.27 | 35.17 ± 11.34 |
| Median nerve (%) | 75.00 | 40.00 |
| Ulnar nerve (%) | 50.00 | 80.00 |
| Sural nerve (%) | 50.00 | 40.00 |
| Upper limb warm threshold ( | 4.05 ± 1.36 | 2.95 ± 0.65 |
| Upper limb cold threshold ( | −2.00 ± 0.61 | −0.38 ± 0.80 |
| Lower limb warm threshold ( | 1.77 ± 0.93 | 3.10 ± 0.03 |
| Lower limb cold threshold ( | −1.76 ± 0.86 | −4.21 ± 1.05 |
The reported values of patient profiles, laboratory data, and thermal QST data represent the mean ± standard error. The reported values of abnormal nerve conduction velocity data, clinical findings, and MRI profile represent percentage.
MRC, Medical Research Council; NIS-LL, Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs; QST, Quantitative sensory test; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging;
mean data are out of the normal range for this laboratory.
Figure 2Typical MRI showing cervical spine T2 hyperintense lesion in an N+O abuse patient. (A) Sagittal view and (B) axial view. (C) Hyperpigmented maculopapular rash observed in an N2O abuse patient.
Comparison of sensory and motor nerve excitability parameters between groups.
| Stimulus for 50% CMAP (mA) | 3.58 ± 0.79 | 2.46 ± 0.17 | NS | 4.59 ± 0.73 | 2.76 ± 0.14 | |
| Peak response (mV) | 7.08 ± 0.87 | 9.7 ± 0.64 | 8.14 ± 1.21 | 8.31 ± 0.46 | NS | |
| Latency (ms) | 7.09 ± 0.28 | 5.59 ± 0.15 | 7.11 ± 0.45 | 6.62 ± 0.17 | NS | |
| Motor SDTC (ms) | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | NS | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | NS |
| RRP (ms) | 3.00 ± 0.17 | 2.99 ± 0.10 | NS | 4.14 ± 0.54 | 3.12 ± 0.09 | NS |
| Superexcitability (%) | −32.95 ± 1.74 | −25.98 ± 2.07 | −27.19 ± 5.71 | −23.98 ± 0.98 | NS | |
| Subexcitability (%) | 11.19 ± 1.01 | 12.63 ± 1.46 | NS | 12.83 ± 1.32 | 16.44 ± 0.94 | NS |
| TEd (40–60 ms) (%) | 56.53 ± 0.70 | 52.39 ± 1.77 | 55.72 ± 1.60 | 50.04 ± 0.78 | ||
| TEd (peak) (%) | 68.97 ± 2.30 | 68.12 ± 1.67 | NS | 70.58 ± 1.34 | 68.33 ± 0.69 | NS |
| TEh (90–100 ms) (%) | −119.86 ± 6.84 | −121.92 ± 8.00 | NS | −127.76 ± 8.91 | −129.87 ± 3.82 | NS |
| Stimulus for 50% SNAP (mA) | 3.28 ± 0.60 | 1.96 ± 0.13 | 3.65 ± 0.78 | 2.24 ± 0.18 | ||
| Peak response (μV) | 30.54 ± 5.98 | 55.48 ± 8.87 | 25.86 ± 3.44 | 39.36 ± 2.47 | ||
| Latency (ms) | 3.57 ± 0.30 | 2.9 ± 0.10 | NS | 3.45 ± 0.23 | 3.33 ± 0.06 | NS |
| Sensory SDTC (ms) | 2.58 ± 0.34 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | NS | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | |
| RRP (ms) | 3.52 ± 0.33 | 3.71 ± 0.10 | NS | 3.57 ± 0.26 | 3.44 ± 0.12 | NS |
| Superexcitability (%) | −23.65 ± 3.50 | −18.07 ± 1.03 | NS | −28.58 ± 3.71 | −16.61 ± 1.06 | |
| Subexcitability (%) | 10.88 ± 0.74 | 10.46 ± 0.71 | NS | 8.31 ± 1.64 | 12.39 ± 0.61 | |
| TEd (40–60 ms) (%) | 56.43 ± 6.25 | 47.98 ± 1.64 | NS | 54.60 ± 1.26 | 48.53 ± 0.62 | |
| TEd (peak) (%) | 68.56 ± 5.52 | 60.62 ± 1.03 | NS | 67.31 ± 3.35 | 59.36 ± 0.51 | |
| TEh (90–100 ms) (%) | −130.08 ± 5.73 | −133.05 ± 7.68 | NS | −161.35 ± 13.79 | −145.44 ± 4.35 | NS |
HC, healthy control; CMAP, compound muscle action potential; SNAP, sensory nerve action potential; SDTC, estrength-duration time constant; RRP, relative refractory period; NS, not statistically significant. The reported values represent the mean ± standard error and the p-value from t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests of patient groups vs. age-matched healthy controls, depending on normality.
Figure 3Comparison of sensory and motor axonal dysfunction parameters in N2O abuse and vitamin B12 deficiency patients. (A,B) motor threshold electrotonus, (C,D) motor recovery cycle, (E,F) sensory threshold electrotonus, and (G,H) sensory recovery cycle. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4Different patterns of myeloneuropathy in N2O abuse and vitamin B12 deficiency, as revealed by different diagnostic modalities in the present study. (A) Spinal MRI revealed more prevalent T2 hyperintensity in the N2O abuse group. (B) The motor axonal study revealed more prominent dysfunction in the N2O abuse group. (C) The sensory axonal study revealed more prominent dysfunction in the vitamin B12 deficiency group. (D) Thermal QST (quantitative sensory testing) revealed that temperature sensation was similarly affected in both groups.