Kyle B Walsh1,2. 1. 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 2. 2 University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of stroke in the prehospital environment is the subject of intense interest and research. There are a number of non-invasive external brain monitoring devices in development that utilize various technologies to function as sensors for stroke and other neurological conditions. Future increased use of one or more of these devices could result in substantial changes in the current processes for stroke diagnosis and treatment, including transportation of stroke patients by emergency medical services. AIMS: The present review will summarize information about 10 stroke sensor devices currently in development, utilizing various forms of technology, and all of which are external, non-invasive brain monitoring devices. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Ten devices are discussed including the technology utilized, the indications for use (stroke and, when relevant, other neurological conditions), the environment(s) indicated for use (with a focus on the prehospital setting), a description of the physical structure of each instrument, and, when available, findings that have been published in peer-reviewed journals or otherwise reported. The review is organized based on the technology utilized by each device, and seven distinct forms were identified: accelerometers, electroencephalography (EEG), microwaves, near-infrared, radiofrequency, transcranial doppler ultrasound, and volumetric impedance phase shift spectroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive external brain monitoring devices are in various stages of development and have promise as stroke sensors in the prehospital setting. Some of the potential applications include to differentiate stroke from non-stroke, ischemic from hemorrhage stroke, and large vessel occlusion (LVO) from non-LVO ischemic stroke. Successful stroke diagnosis prior to hospital arrival could transform the current diagnostic and treatment paradigm for this disease.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of stroke in the prehospital environment is the subject of intense interest and research. There are a number of non-invasive external brain monitoring devices in development that utilize various technologies to function as sensors for stroke and other neurological conditions. Future increased use of one or more of these devices could result in substantial changes in the current processes for stroke diagnosis and treatment, including transportation of strokepatients by emergency medical services. AIMS: The present review will summarize information about 10 stroke sensor devices currently in development, utilizing various forms of technology, and all of which are external, non-invasive brain monitoring devices. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Ten devices are discussed including the technology utilized, the indications for use (stroke and, when relevant, other neurological conditions), the environment(s) indicated for use (with a focus on the prehospital setting), a description of the physical structure of each instrument, and, when available, findings that have been published in peer-reviewed journals or otherwise reported. The review is organized based on the technology utilized by each device, and seven distinct forms were identified: accelerometers, electroencephalography (EEG), microwaves, near-infrared, radiofrequency, transcranial doppler ultrasound, and volumetric impedance phase shift spectroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive external brain monitoring devices are in various stages of development and have promise as stroke sensors in the prehospital setting. Some of the potential applications include to differentiate stroke from non-stroke, ischemic from hemorrhage stroke, and large vessel occlusion (LVO) from non-LVO ischemic stroke. Successful stroke diagnosis prior to hospital arrival could transform the current diagnostic and treatment paradigm for this disease.
Authors: Susmita Chennareddy; Roshini Kalagara; Colton Smith; Stavros Matsoukas; Abhiraj Bhimani; John Liang; Steven Shapiro; Reade De Leacy; Maxim Mokin; Johanna T Fifi; J Mocco; Christopher P Kellner Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Mehul D Patel; Jackie Thompson; José G Cabañas; Jefferson G Williams; Erin Lewis; Michael Bachman; Mahmoud Al Masry; Charles LaVigne; Leonardo Morantes; Tibor Becske; Omar Kass-Hout Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Stephanie P Jones; Janet E Bray; Josephine Me Gibson; Graham McClelland; Colette Miller; Chris I Price; Caroline L Watkins Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Hannah A Lumley; Darren Flynn; Lisa Shaw; Graham McClelland; Gary A Ford; Phil M White; Christopher I Price Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-04-26
Authors: Jorge A Tobon Vasquez; Rosa Scapaticci; Giovanna Turvani; Gennaro Bellizzi; David O Rodriguez-Duarte; Nadine Joachimowicz; Bernard Duchêne; Enrico Tedeschi; Mario R Casu; Lorenzo Crocco; Francesca Vipiana Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2020-05-03 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Cassandra M Wilkinson; Jennifer I Burrell; Jonathan W P Kuziek; Sibi Thirunavukkarasu; Brian H Buck; Kyle E Mathewson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 4.379