BACKGROUND: Australia has recently introduced a new screening program for cervical cancer. There has also been a decline in participation rates for cervical screening. AIM: To complete a systematic literature review of the factors that prevent Australian women from participating in cervical screening. METHODS: Authors searched CINAHL, Medline, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library to obtain articles discussing Australian women's self-identified barriers to cervical screening. Quantitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals after 1991 were considered. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018105028. RESULTS: The final search produced 1749 studies, with 13 quantitative papers included in the narrative synthesis after screening by two independent reviewers. No articles were excluded due to bias. DISCUSSION: Self-identified barriers to screening were categorised into personal, practitioner, test-related and logistical factors. The most commonly stated barriers included lack of time, embarrassment, fear of results, irrelevance and male health professionals. The use of HPV triage in cervical screening was not a barrier to screening, however, some women regarded self-collected HPV testing as a barrier. Barriers to self-collection included desire for the general practitioner to complete the test, fear of doing the test incorrectly, wishing to include it in a general check-up and concerns about the test itself. CONCLUSION: A variety of personal, practitioner, test-related and logistical barriers negatively impact the screening participation of Australian women. Further research into barriers in the Australian population, and women's attitudes towards HPV testing and self-collection is required to create effective health interventions to improve participation in cervical screening.
BACKGROUND: Australia has recently introduced a new screening program for cervical cancer. There has also been a decline in participation rates for cervical screening. AIM: To complete a systematic literature review of the factors that prevent Australian women from participating in cervical screening. METHODS: Authors searched CINAHL, Medline, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library to obtain articles discussing Australian women's self-identified barriers to cervical screening. Quantitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals after 1991 were considered. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018105028. RESULTS: The final search produced 1749 studies, with 13 quantitative papers included in the narrative synthesis after screening by two independent reviewers. No articles were excluded due to bias. DISCUSSION: Self-identified barriers to screening were categorised into personal, practitioner, test-related and logistical factors. The most commonly stated barriers included lack of time, embarrassment, fear of results, irrelevance and male health professionals. The use of HPV triage in cervical screening was not a barrier to screening, however, some women regarded self-collected HPV testing as a barrier. Barriers to self-collection included desire for the general practitioner to complete the test, fear of doing the test incorrectly, wishing to include it in a general check-up and concerns about the test itself. CONCLUSION: A variety of personal, practitioner, test-related and logistical barriers negatively impact the screening participation of Australian women. Further research into barriers in the Australian population, and women's attitudes towards HPV testing and self-collection is required to create effective health interventions to improve participation in cervical screening.
Authors: Brandon Chua; Viva Ma; Caitlin Asjes; Ashley Lim; Mahsa Mohseni; Hwee Lin Wee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Paramita Dasgupta; John R Condon; Lisa J Whop; Joanne F Aitken; Gail Garvey; Mark Wenitong; Peter D Baade Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Nicola S Creagh; Claire Zammit; Julia Ml Brotherton; Marion Saville; Tracey McDermott; Claire Nightingale; Margaret Kelaher Journal: Womens Health (Lond) Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Tamara L Butler; Natasha Lee; Kate Anderson; Julia M L Brotherton; Joan Cunningham; John R Condon; Gail Garvey; Allison Tong; Suzanne P Moore; Clare M Maher; Jacqueline K Mein; Eloise F Warren; Lisa J Whop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Tamara L Butler; Kate Anderson; John R Condon; Gail Garvey; Julia M L Brotherton; Joan Cunningham; Allison Tong; Suzanne P Moore; Clare M Maher; Jacqueline K Mein; Eloise F Warren; Lisa J Whop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240