| Literature DB >> 31353412 |
Zbigniew Kalarus1,2, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen3,4, Davide Capodanno5, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan6, Elia De Maria7, Bulent Gorenek8, Ewa Jędrzejczyk-Patej9, Michał Mazurek9, Tomasz Podolecki9, Christian Sticherling10, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen3,11, Vassil Traykov12, Gregory Y H Lip13,14, Laurent Fauchier15, Giuseppe Boriani16, Jacques Mansourati17, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist18, Georges H Mairesse19, Andrea Rubboli20, Thomas Deneke21, Nikolaos Dagres22, Torkel Steen23, Ingo Ahrens24, Vijay Kunadian25,26, Sergio Berti27.
Abstract
Despite major therapeutic advances over the last decades, complex supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), particularly in the emergency setting or during revascularization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), remain an important clinical problem. Although the incidence of VAs has declined in the hospital phase of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), mainly due to prompt revascularization and optimal medical therapy, still up to 6% patients with ACS develop ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation within the first hours of ACS symptoms. Despite sustained VAs being perceived predictors of worse in-hospital outcomes, specific associations between the type of VAs, arrhythmia timing, applied treatment strategies and long-term prognosis in AMI are vague. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia that may be asymptomatic and/or may be associated with rapid haemodynamic deterioration requiring immediate treatment. It is estimated that over 20% AMI patients may have a history of AF, whereas the new-onset arrhythmia may occur in 5% patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Importantly, patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI and developed AF have higher rates of adverse events and mortality compared with subjects free of arrhythmia. The scope of this position document is to cover the clinical implications and pharmacological/non-pharmacological management of arrhythmias in emergency presentations and during revascularization. Current evidence for clinical relevance of specific types of VAs complicating AMI in relation to arrhythmia timing has been discussed. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Atrial fibrillation; Reperfusion; Ventricular fibrillation; Ventricular tachycardia
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31353412 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Europace ISSN: 1099-5129 Impact factor: 5.214