Thibaut Petroni1, Cosimo D'Alessandro2, Alain Combes3, Jean-Louis Golmard4, Nicolas Brechot3, Eleodoro Barreda2, Mojgan Laali2, Patrick Farahmand2, Shaida Varnous2, Pascale Weber2, Alain Pavie2, Pascal Leprince2. 1. Cardiology Department, ELSAN, Clinique du Pont de Chaume, 82000 Montauban, France. Electronic address: thibautpetroni@gmail.com. 2. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiology Institute, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, UPMC, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France. 3. Intensive Care Unit, Cardiology Institute, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, UPMC, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, UPMC, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term outcome of heart transplantation in patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) are scarce. AIM: To evaluate long-term outcome after heart transplantation in patients with a VAD compared with no mechanical circulatory support. METHODS: Consecutive all-comers who underwent heart transplantation were included at a single high-volume centre from January 2005 until December 2012, with 5 years of follow-up. Clinical and biological characteristics, operative results, outcomes and survival were recorded. Regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 1-year and 5-year mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with bridge to transplantation by VAD (VAD group) and 289 patients transplanted without a VAD (standard group) were enrolled. The mean age was 46±11 years in the VAD group compared with 51±13 years in the standard group (P=0.01); 17% of the VAD group and 25% of the standard group were women (P=0.21). Ischaemic time was longer in the VAD group (207±54 vs 169±60minutes; P<0.01). There was no difference in primary graft failure (33% vs 25%; P=0.22) or 1-year mortality (17% vs 28%; P=0.12). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative VAD was an independent protective factor for 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.97; P=0.04). Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality were recipient age>60 years, recipient creatinine, body surface area mismatch and ischaemic time. The VAD and standard groups had similar long-term survival, with 5-year mortality rates of 35% and 40%, respectively (P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Bridge to transplantation by VAD was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality, leading critically ill patients to similar long-term survival compared with patients who underwent standard heart transplantation. This alternative strategy may benefit carefully selected patients.
BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term outcome of heart transplantation in patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) are scarce. AIM: To evaluate long-term outcome after heart transplantation in patients with a VAD compared with no mechanical circulatory support. METHODS: Consecutive all-comers who underwent heart transplantation were included at a single high-volume centre from January 2005 until December 2012, with 5 years of follow-up. Clinical and biological characteristics, operative results, outcomes and survival were recorded. Regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 1-year and 5-year mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with bridge to transplantation by VAD (VAD group) and 289 patients transplanted without a VAD (standard group) were enrolled. The mean age was 46±11 years in the VAD group compared with 51±13 years in the standard group (P=0.01); 17% of the VAD group and 25% of the standard group were women (P=0.21). Ischaemic time was longer in the VAD group (207±54 vs 169±60minutes; P<0.01). There was no difference in primary graft failure (33% vs 25%; P=0.22) or 1-year mortality (17% vs 28%; P=0.12). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative VAD was an independent protective factor for 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.97; P=0.04). Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality were recipient age>60 years, recipient creatinine, body surface area mismatch and ischaemic time. The VAD and standard groups had similar long-term survival, with 5-year mortality rates of 35% and 40%, respectively (P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Bridge to transplantation by VAD was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality, leading critically illpatients to similar long-term survival compared with patients who underwent standard heart transplantation. This alternative strategy may benefit carefully selected patients.