Literature DB >> 31353250

Does Trochanteric Osteotomy Length Affect the Amount of Proximal Trochanteric Migration During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Sebastián A León1, Xin Y Mei1, Ethan B Sanders1, Oleg A Safir1, Allan E Gross1, Paul R T Kuzyk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonunion and proximal trochanteric migration is a known complication of trochanteric osteotomy. This study examines the effect of osteotomy length on proximal greater trochanter (GT) migration.
METHODS: We analyzed 113 modified trochanteric slide osteotomies and 73 extended trochanteric osteotomies performed between 2008 and 2016. All osteotomies were fixed using cerclage wires and had minimum 6-month radiographic follow-up. Spearman correlations were used to assess association between osteotomy length and GT migration distance. Chi-squared test and logistic regression were used to assess association between patient and surgical factors and GT migration >1 cm. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the optimal cutoff osteotomy length for predicting GT migration >1cm.
RESULTS: Mean osteotomy length was 6.1 cm (range 3-12) for modified trochanteric slide osteotomies and 14.8 cm (range 8-23) for extended trochanteric osteotomies. Osteotomy length was negatively correlated (r = -0.340, P < .001) with GT migration distance. Longer osteotomy length was protective against GT migration >1 cm (odds ratio 0.67, P = .002). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an optimal cutoff osteotomy length of 9.8 cm for predicting GT migration >1 cm (sensitivity 0.971, specificity 0.461). Among osteotomies <10 cm, those fixed using at least one distal wire below the lesser trochanter and vastus ridge demonstrated less mean GT migration (3.86 vs 7.12 mm, P = .009) and higher mean union rate (68.8% vs 31.2%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Osteotomies shorter than 10 cm are at higher risk of developing proximal GT migration >1 cm. A distal cerclage wire below the lesser trochanter and vastus ridge may help decrease the amount of GT migration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; length; migration; outcome; revision total hip arthroplasty; trochanteric osteotomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31353250     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Save the Greater Trochanter: A Novel Modification to the Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy.

Authors:  Eric B Smith
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Khalid Hamad; Sujith Konan
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-04-03

3.  [Effectiveness of proximal femur reconstruction combined with total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of hip].

Authors:  Lei Tang; Min Chen; Guoyuan Li; Zhengliang Luo; Xiaofeng Ji; Xiaoqi Zhang; Kerong Wu; Chen Zhu; Xifu Shang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 4.  Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kavin Sundaram; Ahmed Siddiqi; Atul F Kamath; Carlos A Higuera-Rueda
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.