Ruma G Singh1, Ngoc N Nguyen1, Aya Cervantes1, Jaelim Cho1, Maxim S Petrov2. 1. School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: max.petrov@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The relationship between intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) and lipid profile has been investigated in individuals with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes, but not in healthy non-obese individuals and those after acute pancreatitis. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between serum lipid profile and IPFD in the latter individuals and to determine the effect of abdominal fat distribution and other covariates. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 90 individuals with a history of acute pancreatitis as well as 23 healthy non-obese individuals participated in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify IPFD and visceral-to-subcutaneous fat volume ratio, followed by fasting state measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), TC/HDL-C ratio, and triglycerides. In healthy non-obese individuals, IPFD was not significantly associated with any of the studied markers. In individuals after acute pancreatitis, IPFD was significantly associated with triglycerides in both unadjusted (β = 0.360; 95% CI, 0.090-0.629; p = 0.009) and adjusted models, with a β-coefficient of 0.280 [(95% CI, 0.016-0.545); p = 0.038] in the most adjusted model. Also, IPFD was significantly associated with TC/HDL-C ratio in both unadjusted (β = 0.336; 95% CI, 0.045-0.626; p = 0.024) and adjusted models, with a β-coefficient of 0.375 [(95% CI, 0.090-0.660); p = 0.010] in the most adjusted model. Multiple regression yielded triglycerides, but not TC/HDL-C ratio, as a significant marker of IPFD in individuals after acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipid profile is not associated with IPFD in healthy non-obese. Triglycerides, but not other components of lipid profile, is a promising biomarker for IPFD in individuals following acute pancreatitis.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The relationship between intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) and lipid profile has been investigated in individuals with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes, but not in healthy non-obese individuals and those after acute pancreatitis. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between serum lipid profile and IPFD in the latter individuals and to determine the effect of abdominal fat distribution and other covariates. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 90 individuals with a history of acute pancreatitis as well as 23 healthy non-obese individuals participated in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify IPFD and visceral-to-subcutaneous fat volume ratio, followed by fasting state measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), TC/HDL-C ratio, and triglycerides. In healthy non-obese individuals, IPFD was not significantly associated with any of the studied markers. In individuals after acute pancreatitis, IPFD was significantly associated with triglycerides in both unadjusted (β = 0.360; 95% CI, 0.090-0.629; p = 0.009) and adjusted models, with a β-coefficient of 0.280 [(95% CI, 0.016-0.545); p = 0.038] in the most adjusted model. Also, IPFD was significantly associated with TC/HDL-C ratio in both unadjusted (β = 0.336; 95% CI, 0.045-0.626; p = 0.024) and adjusted models, with a β-coefficient of 0.375 [(95% CI, 0.090-0.660); p = 0.010] in the most adjusted model. Multiple regression yielded triglycerides, but not TC/HDL-C ratio, as a significant marker of IPFD in individuals after acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipid profile is not associated with IPFD in healthy non-obese. Triglycerides, but not other components of lipid profile, is a promising biomarker for IPFD in individuals following acute pancreatitis.
Authors: Andre E Modesto; Charlotte E Stuart; Jaelim Cho; Juyeon Ko; Ruma G Singh; Maxim S Petrov Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 5.315