Literature DB >> 31353177

A triple-blinded randomized trial comparing spinal morphine with posterior quadratus lumborum block after cesarean section.

T Tamura1, S Yokota2, M Ando3, Y Kubo3, K Nishiwaki4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block with spinal morphine, after cesarean section, using the visual analogue scale pain score.
METHODS: One-hundred-and-seventy-six pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into four groups to receive spinal morphine 0.1 mg (group M+); spinal saline (M-); posterior quadratus lumborum block using either 0.3% ropivacaine (0.45 mL/kg each side, maximum 150 mg) group pQ+); or saline (pQ-). All patients received 11-13 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 10 μg fentanyl. Intravenous droperidol, fentanyl and acetaminophen were administered during surgery. Bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block was performed immediately after surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 18 and 24 h after surgery, and the pain score 6 h after surgery was the primary endpoint.
RESULTS: One-hundred-and-forty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Pain scores 6 h after surgery, both at rest and when moving, were significantly different when comparing the M+pQ+ group with the M-pQ+ or M-pQ- groups, and when comparing the M+pQ- group with the M- pQ+ or M- pQ- groups (all P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the M+pQ+ and M+pQ- groups, or between the M-pQ+ and M-pQ- groups.
CONCLUSION: Spinal morphine improved postoperative analgesia but the combination of posterior quadratus lumborum block with spinal morphine did not lead to further improvement.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Intrathecal morphine; Posterior quadratus lumborum block; Postoperative pain; Regional anesthesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31353177     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  7 in total

1.  The Efficacy and Safety of Local Anesthetic Techniques for Postoperative Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Ge Zhao; Guang Song; Jing Liu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.133

2.  Bilateral posterior Quadratus Lumborum block for pain relief after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pawinee Pangthipampai; Sukanya Dejarkom; Suppachai Poolsuppasit; Choopong Luansritisakul; Suwida Tangchittam
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

Authors:  E Roofthooft; G P Joshi; N Rawal; M Van de Velde
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 12.893

4.  Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Zhigang Zhao; Kaiming Xu; Yanting Zhang; Gang Chen; Youfa Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Acute Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cheng Lin; Xuemei Wang; Chaosheng Qin; Jingchen Liu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 6.  Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Choongun Ryu; Geun Joo Choi; Yong Hun Jung; Chong Wha Baek; Choon Kyu Cho; Hyun Kang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 7.  Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean: Current and Emerging Trends.

Authors:  Kishan Patel; Mark Zakowski
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.