Literature DB >> 31352313

Are mammographic density phenotypes associated with breast cancer treatment response and clinical outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ibrahem H Kanbayti1, William I D Rae2, Mark F McEntee3, Ernest U Ekpo4.   

Abstract

Mammographic density (MD) increases breast cancer (BC) risk, however, its association with patient outcomes is unclear. We examined the association of baseline MD (BMD), and MD reduction (MDR) following BC treatment with patient outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase) were used to identify relevant articles. The PRISMA strategy was used to extract relevant details. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the "Quality In Prognosis Studies" (QUIPS) tool. A Meta-analysis and pooled risk estimates were performed. Results showed that BMD is associated with contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk (HR = 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-3.0, p = 0.0007), recurrence (HR = 2.0; 95%CI: 1.0-4.0, p = 0.04), and mortality (HR = 1.4; 95%CI: 1.1-1.9, p = 0.003). No association was found between BMD and prognosis (HR = 3.2; 95%CI: 0.9-11.2, p = 0.06). Data on risk estimates (95%CI) from BMD for survival [RR: 1.75; 0.99-3.1 to 2.4; 1.4-4.1], ipsilateral BC [HR: 1; 0.6-1.6 to 3; 1.2-7.5], and treatment response (OR, 1.8; 0.98-3.3) are limited. MDR showed no association with mortality (HR = 0.5; 95%CI: 0.2-1.2, p = 0.13). MDR is associated with a reduced risk of recurrence [HR/RR: 0.35; 0.17-0.68 to 1.33; 0.67-2.65)], however data on MDR and outcomes such as mortality [HR/RR: 0.5; 0.27-0.93 to 0.59; 0.22-0.88], and CBC risk [RR/HR: 0.53; 0.24-0.84 to 1.3; 0.6-2.7] are limited. Evidence, although sparse, demonstrates that high BMD is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, CBC, and mortality. Conversely, MDR is associated with a reduced risk of BC recurrence, CBC, and BC-related mortality.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Cancer treatment interventions; Mammographic breast density; Patient outcomes

Year:  2019        PMID: 31352313     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  3 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic density, endocrine therapy and breast cancer risk: a prognostic and predictive biomarker review.

Authors:  Emma C Atakpa; Mangesh A Thorat; Jack Cuzick; Adam R Brentnall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  Mammographic breast density and survival in women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Margherita Pizzato; Greta Carioli; Stefano Rosso; Roberto Zanetti; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.532

3.  Mammographic density change in a cohort of premenopausal women receiving tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention over 5 years.

Authors:  Adam R Brentnall; Ruth Warren; Elaine F Harkness; Susan M Astley; Julia Wiseman; Jill Fox; Lynne Fox; Mikael Eriksson; Per Hall; Jack Cuzick; D Gareth Evans; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.