Douglas Adkins1, Jessica Ley2, Prakash Neupane3, Francis Worden4, Assuntina G Sacco5, Kevin Palka6, Juneko E Grilley-Olson7, Ronald Maggiore8, Noha N Salama9, Kathryn Trinkaus10, Brian A Van Tine11, Conor E Steuer12, Nabil F Saba12, Peter Oppelt11. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: dadkins@wustl.edu. 2. Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. 3. Division of Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA. 6. Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Department of Medicine, St Louis University, St Louis, MO, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, Wilmont Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. 9. Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, St Louis College of Pharmacy, St Louis, MO, USA. 10. Biostatistics Shared Resource, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. 11. Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. 12. Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are driven by p16INK4A inactivation and cyclin D1 overexpression that results in hyperactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), rather than by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Deregulated cyclin D1 expression also causes resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We previously reported that palbociclib (a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor) given with cetuximab (an EGFR inhibitor) was safe. The aim of this study was to establish the proportion of patients achieving an objective response with palbociclib and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. METHODS: We did a multicentre, multigroup, phase 2 trial to evaluate the activity of palbociclib and cetuximab in platinum-resistant (group 1) and cetuximab-resistant (group 2) HPV-unrelated HNSCC. The study was done across eight university sites in the USA. Eligibility required measurable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1·1 [RECIST 1·1]), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, age of 18 years or older, and disease progression on platinum but cetuximab-naive (group 1) or disease progression on cetuximab (group 2). All patients received palbociclib orally (125 mg/day, on days 1-21) and intravenous cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on cycle one, day 1, then 250 mg/m2 once per week) in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response (complete responses and partial responses per RECIST 1·1). Analyses were done per protocol. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101034, and is ongoing, but both groups are closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Oct 19, 2015, and Nov 7, 2018, 62 patients were enrolled onto the trial: 30 patients were enrolled in group 1 and 32 in group 2. Median follow-up was 5·4 months (IQR 4·4-12·1) for group 1 and 5·5 months (4·3-8·3) for group 2. In group 1, of 28 evaluable patients, an objective response was achieved by 11 (39%; 95% CI 22-59). In group 2, of 27 evaluable patients, an objective response was achieved by five (19%; 6-38) in group 2. The most common grade 3-4 palbociclib-related adverse event was neutropenia (in 21 [34%] of 62 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In patients with platinum-resistant or cetuximab-resistant HPV-unrelated HNSCC, palbociclib and cetuximab results in promising activity outcomes. Further studies of CDK4/6 inhibitors are warranted in HPV-unrelated HNSCC. FUNDING: Pfizer.
BACKGROUND: Most head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are driven by p16INK4A inactivation and cyclin D1 overexpression that results in hyperactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), rather than by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Deregulated cyclin D1 expression also causes resistance to EGFR inhibitors. We previously reported that palbociclib (a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor) given with cetuximab (an EGFR inhibitor) was safe. The aim of this study was to establish the proportion of patients achieving an objective response with palbociclib and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. METHODS: We did a multicentre, multigroup, phase 2 trial to evaluate the activity of palbociclib and cetuximab in platinum-resistant (group 1) and cetuximab-resistant (group 2) HPV-unrelated HNSCC. The study was done across eight university sites in the USA. Eligibility required measurable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1·1 [RECIST 1·1]), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, age of 18 years or older, and disease progression on platinum but cetuximab-naive (group 1) or disease progression on cetuximab (group 2). All patients received palbociclib orally (125 mg/day, on days 1-21) and intravenous cetuximab (400 mg/m2 on cycle one, day 1, then 250 mg/m2 once per week) in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response (complete responses and partial responses per RECIST 1·1). Analyses were done per protocol. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101034, and is ongoing, but both groups are closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Oct 19, 2015, and Nov 7, 2018, 62 patients were enrolled onto the trial: 30 patients were enrolled in group 1 and 32 in group 2. Median follow-up was 5·4 months (IQR 4·4-12·1) for group 1 and 5·5 months (4·3-8·3) for group 2. In group 1, of 28 evaluable patients, an objective response was achieved by 11 (39%; 95% CI 22-59). In group 2, of 27 evaluable patients, an objective response was achieved by five (19%; 6-38) in group 2. The most common grade 3-4 palbociclib-related adverse event was neutropenia (in 21 [34%] of 62 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In patients with platinum-resistant or cetuximab-resistant HPV-unrelated HNSCC, palbociclib and cetuximab results in promising activity outcomes. Further studies of CDK4/6 inhibitors are warranted in HPV-unrelated HNSCC. FUNDING: Pfizer.
Authors: Steven Doerstling; David Winski; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Pankaj Agarwal; Pradeep J Poonnen; Jane L Snowdon; Gretchen P Jackson; Dilhan Weeraratne; Michael J Kelley; Vishal Vashistha Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-09-18 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Chen Huang; Lijun Chen; Sara R Savage; Rodrigo Vargas Eguez; Yongchao Dou; Yize Li; Felipe da Veiga Leprevost; Eric J Jaehnig; Jonathan T Lei; Bo Wen; Michael Schnaubelt; Karsten Krug; Xiaoyu Song; Marcin Cieślik; Hui-Yin Chang; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Kai Li; Antonio Colaprico; Qing Kay Li; David J Clark; Yingwei Hu; Liwei Cao; Jianbo Pan; Yuefan Wang; Kyung-Cho Cho; Zhiao Shi; Yuxing Liao; Wen Jiang; Meenakshi Anurag; Jiayi Ji; Seungyeul Yoo; Daniel Cui Zhou; Wen-Wei Liang; Michael Wendl; Pankaj Vats; Steven A Carr; D R Mani; Zhen Zhang; Jiang Qian; Xi S Chen; Alexander R Pico; Pei Wang; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Karen A Ketchum; Christopher R Kinsinger; Ana I Robles; Eunkyung An; Tara Hiltke; Mehdi Mesri; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Alissa M Weaver; Andrew G Sikora; Jan Lubiński; Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Shankha Satpathy; Michael A Gillette; George Miles; Matthew J Ellis; Gilbert S Omenn; Henry Rodriguez; Emily S Boja; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Li Ding; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Adel K El-Naggar; Daniel W Chan; Hui Zhang; Bing Zhang Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Nicholas J Gadsden; Cory D Fulcher; Daniel Li; Nitisha Shrivastava; Carlos Thomas; Jeffrey E Segall; Michael B Prystowsky; Nicolas F Schlecht; Evripidis Gavathiotis; Thomas J Ow Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Paul L Swiecicki; Greg Durm; Emily Bellile; Apurva Bhangale; J Chad Brenner; Francis P Worden Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.651